Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesExplorar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y ticketsNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la TV y en streamingLas 250 mejores seriesProgramas de televisión más popularesExplorar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    ¿Qué verÚltimos tráileresOriginales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterCentral de premiosCentral de festivalesTodos los eventos
    Personas nacidas hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias de famosos
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de seguimiento
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar la aplicación
  • Reparto y equipo
  • Reseñas de usuarios
  • Curiosidades
  • Preguntas frecuentes
IMDbPro

2000 Mules

  • 2022
  • 1h 29min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,0/10
11 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
2000 Mules (2022)
A documentary film which claims widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome.
Reproducir trailer3:01
1 vídeo
2 imágenes
Documental

Expone el supuesto fraude electoral que, según él y los creadores del documental y sin proporcionar pruebas fehacientes, fue coordinado y generalizado en las elecciones de 2020, suficiente p... Leer todoExpone el supuesto fraude electoral que, según él y los creadores del documental y sin proporcionar pruebas fehacientes, fue coordinado y generalizado en las elecciones de 2020, suficiente para cambiar el resultado general.Expone el supuesto fraude electoral que, según él y los creadores del documental y sin proporcionar pruebas fehacientes, fue coordinado y generalizado en las elecciones de 2020, suficiente para cambiar el resultado general.

  • Dirección
    • Debbie D'Souza
    • Dinesh D'Souza
    • Bruce Schooley
  • Guión
    • Debbie D'Souza
    • Dinesh D'Souza
    • Bruce Schooley
  • Reparto principal
    • Dinesh D'Souza
    • Catherine Engelbrecht
    • Gregg Phillips
  • Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro
  • PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
    5,0/10
    11 mil
    TU PUNTUACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Debbie D'Souza
      • Dinesh D'Souza
      • Bruce Schooley
    • Guión
      • Debbie D'Souza
      • Dinesh D'Souza
      • Bruce Schooley
    • Reparto principal
      • Dinesh D'Souza
      • Catherine Engelbrecht
      • Gregg Phillips
    • 310Reseñas de usuarios
    • 15Reseñas de críticos
  • Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro
  • Vídeos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 3:01
    Official Trailer

    Imágenes1

    Ver cartel

    Reparto principal43

    Editar
    Dinesh D'Souza
    Dinesh D'Souza
    • Self - Filmmaker
    Catherine Engelbrecht
    Catherine Engelbrecht
    • Self - Co-Founder of True the Vote
    Gregg Phillips
    Gregg Phillips
    • Self - True the Vote Board Member
    Debbie D'Souza
    Debbie D'Souza
    • Self - Dinesh's Wife
    Dennis Prager
    Dennis Prager
    • Self - Host, The Dennis Prager Show
    Larry Elder
    Larry Elder
    • Self - Host, The Larry Elder Show
    Sebastian Gorka
    Sebastian Gorka
    • Self - Host, America First with Sebastian Gorka
    Charlie Kirk
    Charlie Kirk
    • Self - Host, The Charlie Kirk Show
    Eric Metaxas
    Eric Metaxas
    • Self - Host, The Eric Metaxas Show
    Scott Walter
    Scott Walter
    • Self - President, Capital Research Center
    Hans von Spakovsky
    Hans von Spakovsky
    • Self - Co-Author, Our Broken Elections: How the Left Changed the Way You Vote
    Stacey Abrams
    Stacey Abrams
    • Self - Founder, Fair Fight Action
    • (metraje de archivo)
    John Avlon
    John Avlon
    • Self - Host, Reality Check with John Avlon
    • (metraje de archivo)
    Bret Baier
    Bret Baier
    • Self - Host, Special Report with Bret Baier
    • (metraje de archivo)
    Jody Barr
    Jody Barr
    • Self - Chief Investigative Reporter, KXAN
    • (metraje de archivo)
    William Barr
    William Barr
    • Self - Former U.S. Attorneys General
    • (metraje de archivo)
    Dana Bash
    Dana Bash
    • Self - Host, State of the Union
    • (metraje de archivo)
    John Berman
    John Berman
    • Self - Host, CNN New Day
    • (metraje de archivo)
    • Dirección
      • Debbie D'Souza
      • Dinesh D'Souza
      • Bruce Schooley
    • Guión
      • Debbie D'Souza
      • Dinesh D'Souza
      • Bruce Schooley
    • Todo el reparto y equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Reseñas de usuarios310

    5,010.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Reseñas destacadas

    1saldorman

    Makes you think stuff is wrong - until you DO think

    Cleverly staged to mask the fact that there's NO actual evidence! Nothing illegal is actually stated for Arizona. The people going to drop boxes aren't doing anything wrong. The one guy driving around with a bag of ballots is an actor. There are no verifications anywhere of the geotracking work. The scenes about non-profits is just what they "might" be doing... and are ridiculous. When you take all those out - there's nothing left.
    1billieclew

    Why we have films like this

    This film essentially concocts a spy-movie plot, finds video clips that seem to support bits and pieces of that, and whips it into a gigantic conspiracy theory. And presents that to the viewer as "proven".

    Look at the faked multi-dropbox scenes. Look at the faked dropbox screens (one in Moscow). Look at the unverified cellphone pattern charts. Look at the undated and therefore worthless whistleblower scene. Look at the innocent voters simply being called "criminals" by the panel! Listen to the unsupported fantasizing about "non-profits" victimizing hundreds of thousands of people.

    Why do we have films like this? Late last year, when asked by an associate why he keeps pushing the Steal, Trump said: "It keeps my base motivated, and will help Republicans win".

    So people like D'Souza and Phillips here are in demand. They can knock out conspiracy theory films like this on command, convincing countless people that their national election was stolen.
    mcsears

    Sleight of Hand

    The film appears to prove that batches of ballots were dropped into ballot boxes. No evidence if offered about the contents of those votes. We never see the actual ballots. They might just as well have been for Trump as for Biden.

    Plus, if those ballots actually were illegitimate, that calls into question not only the Presidential vote but ALL the votes all the way down the ballot. If the votes were fraudulant, then no Senator or Representative or Governor elected in 2020 has been eleced legitimately. And why only the swing states??? Think about it.
    6tallymore

    Lights! Chimera! Action!

    This entire wad is a chimera - a fantasy built to confirm your belief that Trump was cheated. At last you know how "they" did it! The fact that every single thing here is a lie or a deception won't matter.

    For instance, all the video of "mules" at drop-boxes. D'Souza claims he has 1000 HOURS of this, but all we see are three or four clips of people dropping off a ballot. These are run repeatedly from different angles so the narrators can fantasize about what the "mules" must have been thinking. One person takes a selfie; from that comes the theory that pictures were demanded by mules paymasters. Another wears gloves; which is obviously to avoid fingerprints. She tosses those in the trash; clearly as instructed to do. Onlookers do nothing; certainly because they are too shocked to react. Etc.

    In all those 1000 hours D'Souza has NONE that shows a person going to more than one box. Which is THE HEART of his mules theory, of course. So he FAKED those scenes with the actor Jacob Hyman, not listed in the film's main credits. And in all that video he has only one person dropping off several ballots. He calls this poor man a "criminal"; but it turns out that the ballots were his family's so perfectly legal. No apology from D'Souza - but he is being sued.

    Then there's the cellphone data, which according to Gregg Phillips exactly confirm the theory of mules gathering ballots at non-profit organizations and distributing them around the city. The fact that locating someone AT a dropbox is impossible means nothing. And of course that data won't be released and the analyses can't be verified. And Gregg is responsible for the enormous lie that millions of illegals voted in 2016. His word here is equally worthless. And btw CRUCIAL to the film's claims.

    Then there's the "non-profits" such as nursing homes, shelters, community centers, 4H homes etc. Thousands of staff there apparently coerced or tricked hundreds of thousands of residents to vote for Biden, then fed these ballots into the mules system. Strangely, none of these people or their victims or the mules have come forward or been found in all this time.

    D'Souza doesn't leave it at tha. Every line of the script and every reaction is crafted to further the deception. And being professional work is very persuasive... especially to those who want desperately to believe. So we see people claiming that it's "irrefutable evidence of massive fraud".

    A chimera - created from nothing but tearing our nation apart. That's the real crime here.
    1macidonovan

    Whaaat??

    So what are they telling us? The Arizona woman doesn't actually say that anything criminal happened. Ballot transport there was legal until recently and no dates are mentioned, go figure. The camera videos are nothing even though the speaker says it's all suspicious. He says the geo tracking is suspicious too but they never follow up with anybody real. Just suspicion, suspicion, suspicion without proof. And lots of drama acting. What they said about them solving murders turns out to be a lie. I think it's all a lie.

    Más del estilo

    Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party
    4,8
    Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party
    Police State
    5,6
    Police State
    Trump Card
    4,5
    Trump Card
    Vindicating Trump
    4,1
    Vindicating Trump
    Death of a Nation
    4,1
    Death of a Nation
    2016: Obama's America
    4,8
    2016: Obama's America
    The Greatest Lie Ever Sold: George Floyd and the Rise of BLM
    7,0
    The Greatest Lie Ever Sold: George Floyd and the Rise of BLM
    America: Imagine the World Without Her
    5,0
    America: Imagine the World Without Her
    Died Suddenly
    6,7
    Died Suddenly
    The Real Anthony Fauci
    6,6
    The Real Anthony Fauci
    What Is a Woman?
    8,1
    What Is a Woman?
    No Safe Spaces
    7,1
    No Safe Spaces

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que...?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Eight Arizona Republican officials held a meeting with about 200 others to hear a presentation from producers Gregg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht weeks after the film's release. Phillips called the press "journalistic terrorists" for demonstrating the film's lack of proof. Asked if he had turned over evidence to law enforcement, Phillips said he had given data to the Arizona Attorney General's office a year earlier; however, the AG's office said they never received it.
    • Pifias
      The film claims to show ballot drop box locations for Gwinnett County, Georgia but overlays them on a map of Moscow, Russia.
    • Citas

      Whistleblower: Most of them, maybe, I would say honestly, 90% of the elderlies that live in San Luis don't drive or have relatives that are willing to drive them to do this, to go to the voting polls.

    • Conexiones
      Featured in The Charlie Kirk Show: 2,000 Mules: A Damning Indictment Against the Regime (2022)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas frecuentes

    • How long is 2000 Mules?Con tecnología de Alexa

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 2 de mayo de 2022 (Estados Unidos)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Sitios oficiales
      • 2000 Mules Official Website
      • Roku [united states]
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • Empresas productoras
      • D'Souza Media
      • Salem Media Group
    • Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
      • 1.465.513 US$
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • 751.755 US$
      • 22 may 2022
    • Recaudación en todo el mundo
      • 1.465.513 US$
    Ver información detallada de taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Duración
      1 hora 29 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
    • Más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más por descubrir

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Inicia sesión para tener más accesoInicia sesión para tener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Anuncios
    • Empleos
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una empresa de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.