PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,6/10
2,8 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
El programa gubernamental Plan 75 alienta a las personas mayores a ser sacrificadas para remediar una sociedad envejecida.El programa gubernamental Plan 75 alienta a las personas mayores a ser sacrificadas para remediar una sociedad envejecida.El programa gubernamental Plan 75 alienta a las personas mayores a ser sacrificadas para remediar una sociedad envejecida.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 12 premios y 17 nominaciones en total
Chieko Baishô
- Michi Kakutani
- (as Baishô Chieko)
Hayato Isomura
- Hiromu Okabe
- (as Isomura Hayato)
Stefanie Arianne
- Maria
- (as Sutefanî Arian)
Taka Takao
- Uncle Yukio Okabe
- (as Takao Taka)
Yumi Kawai
- Yôko Narimiya
- (as Kawai Yûmi)
Hisako Ôkata
- Ineko
- (as Ôkata Hisako)
Kazuyoshi Kushida
- Fujimaru
- (as Kushida Kazuyoshi)
Reseñas destacadas
By a large margin, Japan is the nation with the oldest population in the world, which has dire economic consequences in the future. Director/screenwriter Chie Hayakawa drew on this burgeoning reality and fashioned this quietly provocative 2022 character drama based on the dystopian idea of Plan 75, a government program that gives people 75 or older the option of euthanized suicide. It's a macabre (though not far-fetched) concept that Hayakawa cleverly turns into a subtle thriller based on the power of mass suggestion. The main protagonist is Michi, a lonely 78-year-old hotel cleaner who suddenly loses her job and her home, making her a prime candidate for the program. There are other key characters - a young, conflicted Plan 75 employee and a Filipina service worker who helps dispose the remains - but the focus is primarily on Michi played affectingly by Chieko Baisho. To its detriment, the film has a relentlessly somber tone. It could've benefited from a few scares or even laughs. There were just too many lengthy silent shots of Michi contemplating her fateful decision.
I enjoyed Plan 75, it's a strong commentary on ageism. Humans are so much more than the benefit or drain they have on a society. The few individuals who took the time to get to know a senior in the film, found this out. Is a society that doesn't take care of its elderly and poor really one worth living in? I personally think assisted suicide should be available for those suffering. At the same time the way the government in the film drove the elderly to death was disgusting. I think the ending gives hope that humanity is not truly lost. We can still wake up and recognize each other's value as humans.
I really like the premise of this film. Given Japan's problems with an ageing population this was the perfect country for this movie to be set.
I feel though that it was a missed opportunity. This is because there was no real in-depth conversations about why the country needed to introduce Plan 75. Similarly it wasn't shown how the country was benefiting from it.
No one debated the morals and ethics of it either.
I kept waiting for people to discuss the core issues of Plan 75 but it never came. Instead we see people living depressing lives who consider Plan 75 because living has become so hard.
Why not have someone who is doing quite well but shocks their family by choosing Plan 75 because they see it as doing the right thing for the country?
Or show some young people that need medical attention but cannot get it because all the medical resources have been consumed by the elderly and hence why Plan 75 has become so important.
Anyway I really wanted to like this movie but unfortunately it missed the opportunity to delve into the deeper aspects of what Plan 75 would mean.
I feel though that it was a missed opportunity. This is because there was no real in-depth conversations about why the country needed to introduce Plan 75. Similarly it wasn't shown how the country was benefiting from it.
No one debated the morals and ethics of it either.
I kept waiting for people to discuss the core issues of Plan 75 but it never came. Instead we see people living depressing lives who consider Plan 75 because living has become so hard.
Why not have someone who is doing quite well but shocks their family by choosing Plan 75 because they see it as doing the right thing for the country?
Or show some young people that need medical attention but cannot get it because all the medical resources have been consumed by the elderly and hence why Plan 75 has become so important.
Anyway I really wanted to like this movie but unfortunately it missed the opportunity to delve into the deeper aspects of what Plan 75 would mean.
A difficult subject of the loneliness and desolation of growing old when you are on your own and aggravated by a social & government encouragement of sacrifice any financial burden on the younger generation because you are now not contributing to society (this is not actual circumstances but we may not be far from it yet). It follows the story of 3 main characters (it actually touches much more than 3 different roles/characters in the story) of how this government funded Plan 75 (which because of it success, it is being considered for lowering from age 75 to 65!) is being marketed like a 5-star flan with compensation of money to use before volunteering to die, the gross act of dyibg itself in mass partitioned premises, the disposal of the bodies possessions, mass cremations and ashes lanong in landfills. The main 3 characters include a 78 lady who faces life alone and has to decide to choose the Plan or not, a young guy who markers the solan and a worker who has to handle the dead bodies and their possessions. It's a slow moving story but a hauntingly rewarding one. Remember - if you are lucky, you grow old. Even if you have children, you may be lonely. Even if you have friends, they may die first. A thought provoking story indeed.
Plan 75: A future Japan where the elderly are offered voluntary euthanasia to deal withe strain of an ageing population. They'll even throw in free cremation and interment. As the narrative unfolds though we see there are subtle pressures placed on older people, they are still working into their 70s, even at manual outdoor jobs, they lack security of tenure in their homes. They are not made into Soylent Green but even their last moments lack the dignity which was offered in that film. They also face violence, the opening scene a middle- aged man shoots his wheelchair bound parent and then commits suicide. The widespread nature of the threat is subtly alluded to. While senior citizens are seen as disposable, immigrant Filipino workers are used as cheap labour as caregivers. Some deeply personal stories are related as characters challenge roles which seem preordained. It's a plausible scenario as Plan 75 also offers a kind of Anti-Samaritans talkline where lonely old folk may discuss their woes. A disturbing film which ypu will mull over long after the credits have rolled. Directed and co-written by Chie Hayakawa. 8/10.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesOfficial submission of Japan for the 'Best International Feature Film' category of the 95th Academy Awards in 2023.
- PifiasThe time when the uncle is brought to the clinic is running back and forth. (See the time on the wristwatch then on the car navigation, and later on again on the wristwatch.)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Plan 75?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 385.349 US$
- Duración
- 1h 53min(113 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta