En 1874, en Texas, dos amigos y un explorador indio rescatan a mujeres secuestradas por sádicos traficantes cerca de la frontera con México.En 1874, en Texas, dos amigos y un explorador indio rescatan a mujeres secuestradas por sádicos traficantes cerca de la frontera con México.En 1874, en Texas, dos amigos y un explorador indio rescatan a mujeres secuestradas por sádicos traficantes cerca de la frontera con México.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
It felt like watching porn, sans the smut. The actors really were so bad, I expected them to throw off all clothes and get down to business any second.
It could've been fantastic in it's own genre, had they done so.
Still giving it a rating of 2, because in some twisted way I enjoy suffering through a really bad movie.
Toward the end, things speed up and it's all very anticlimactic. Seems like everyone is tired of the whole mess, can see there's no way to make the movie any good and just want to wrap it up and call it a day.
To my horror, after it's over, they reveal that there are more movies featuring the same, wooden Russian character as the lead. They're just as bad as this, I'm sure.
I'll probably watch them, when I'm in the mood for some punishment.
It could've been fantastic in it's own genre, had they done so.
Still giving it a rating of 2, because in some twisted way I enjoy suffering through a really bad movie.
Toward the end, things speed up and it's all very anticlimactic. Seems like everyone is tired of the whole mess, can see there's no way to make the movie any good and just want to wrap it up and call it a day.
To my horror, after it's over, they reveal that there are more movies featuring the same, wooden Russian character as the lead. They're just as bad as this, I'm sure.
I'll probably watch them, when I'm in the mood for some punishment.
Its so bad i cant even tell you about the story whitout laughing, the actors are so bad and stiff that a robot would do it better !!! And the people behind the camwra how in gods name did they get this job, please join workers at McDonalds ! They should pay me for this time I never will get back looking at this sh..t !!! Who put upp the money for this turkey of a "movie" and the same people should put up more money for acting lesson for the 2 main caracter. And even more money to send the director and producer to a doesent school and learn how to make a dessert movine, beacuse this is not, do something else instead like put yourself on fire feels better !
Once again - it's too damn short! I know it's zero budget and etc, but I was spoiled by classic masterful B-movies and sydicated long running TV shows.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
- Some scenes are beautiful (riding through landscapes, knife fight and shootoot with mexicans),
- The continuation of story and lore (I like when characters remember what they said earlier),
- Cynthia and Don had nice little roles,
- It's kind of campy (sometimes, it's a plus for me),
- I can't deny that Joe Cornet gets better with directing and acting.
Cons:
- /Place your Ad here/
It would be mean to spoiler and deprive you of the watching joy, thus i limited my reviews to points which became better:
1. The plot - elaborated and consistent - great work.
2. Landscapes filming - just magnificent panoramas.
3. Shooting scenes - inheriting the best of westerns 4. Operator work (i rate some sequences better than in John Wick) 5. More first-class actors and new faces 6. Sudden comeback of some previous characters 7. English of the starring Alex Nevsky
One star less since the movie has too much flashbacks to the Gunfight at Rio Bravo.
The fan base knows the original by heart. And if you don't know it, just watch first.
1. The plot - elaborated and consistent - great work.
2. Landscapes filming - just magnificent panoramas.
3. Shooting scenes - inheriting the best of westerns 4. Operator work (i rate some sequences better than in John Wick) 5. More first-class actors and new faces 6. Sudden comeback of some previous characters 7. English of the starring Alex Nevsky
One star less since the movie has too much flashbacks to the Gunfight at Rio Bravo.
The fan base knows the original by heart. And if you don't know it, just watch first.
Just another "masterpiece " with Alexander Nevsky (his real surname is Kuritsyn, that means Chicken) - a self proclaimed "actor", "Mr Universe " (he actually claims he won the same title in bodybuilding as...Schwarzenegger!:)), which is insane, as he never won any, and if you really care enough to expose this impudent fraudster- google the Mr Universe winners of all times and try to find Alexander Nevsky in there. Good luck. So, this Russian-born "wanna-be Schwarzenegger" is constantly commiting publicity fraud, taking pictures with various clueless Hollywood actors, and presenting himself as their good friend, while producing ridiculously bad, money-laundry movies, where he acts as a preposterously awful high school actor with non-existent charisma. Poor guy. His mental disease is progressing, and the more he spends on acting, the more lamer his character becomes. A unique case. His "movies" must be considered only as comedies, and that strong feeling of shame that you obtain from those, only indicates of your healthy intelligence. P. S. He writes all the praising comments for himself, along with his circus members. A very cheap and talentless fraud.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film is a sequel to Tiroteo en Rio Bravo (2023).
- ConexionesFeatures Tiroteo en Rio Bravo (2023)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Taken from Rio Bravo?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración
- 1h 20min(80 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta