PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,2/10
12 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idioma1975. A chronicle of the incidents that took place under the leadership of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, one of the most powerful women in Indian history.1975. A chronicle of the incidents that took place under the leadership of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, one of the most powerful women in Indian history.1975. A chronicle of the incidents that took place under the leadership of Mrs. Indira Gandhi, one of the most powerful women in Indian history.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Daria Gavrushenko
- Reporter BBC
- (crédito solo)
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Emergency' delves into Indira Gandhi's political career, highlighting the Emergency period. Kangana Ranaut's performance and direction are lauded for capturing Gandhi's complexities. The film is praised for historical accuracy, nuanced storytelling, and strong cast performances. However, some criticize its pacing, rushed narrative, and lack of depth in certain events. Unnecessary songs and awkward dialogue are also noted. Despite these issues, it is seen as an impactful film offering valuable historical insights.
Reseñas destacadas
Most of the incidents are rushed through and summarised quickly.. which is ok as long as people have already read about it in past. The main focus seemed to be on Mrs Gandhi's character and not on details of emergency..if movie is renamed then it will appeal more.
Acting is superb, mainly for actors who played Gandhi family.
Angle and conversation with spiritual leader is good and new.
Probably many scenes were cut hence it seemed like an overview of incidents , so in my opinion it covers around 80% and still 20% important mentions are missed like passing law with backdated in affect which could have shown real power hunger or more gray character.
Acting is superb, mainly for actors who played Gandhi family.
Angle and conversation with spiritual leader is good and new.
Probably many scenes were cut hence it seemed like an overview of incidents , so in my opinion it covers around 80% and still 20% important mentions are missed like passing law with backdated in affect which could have shown real power hunger or more gray character.
Emergency 2025 is a film that aspires to be grand but collapses under the weight of its own ambition. The plot is a jumbled mess, riddled with inconsistencies and subplots that go nowhere. It's hard to stay engaged when the pacing is erratic, dragging during unnecessary exposition and rushing through critical moments that should carry emotional weight. The lack of coherence makes the entire movie feel like a chore to watch.
The characters are poorly written, with no depth or development, and the performances lack any conviction. It's as if the cast themselves couldn't connect with the clunky, cliché-ridden dialogue. The visuals, often touted as a highlight in big-budget films, are shockingly underwhelming here. The special effects are dated, and the action sequences are predictable and uninspired, offering no sense of thrill or innovation.
Even the soundtrack fails to enhance the experience, feeling disconnected and forgettable. The film attempts to evoke nostalgia and urgency but comes across as desperate rather than impactful. It misses the mark on delivering either meaningful commentary or genuine entertainment.
Overall, Emergency 2025 is a massive disappointment, squandering its potential and leaving viewers frustrated. If you value your time and money, give this one a miss.
The characters are poorly written, with no depth or development, and the performances lack any conviction. It's as if the cast themselves couldn't connect with the clunky, cliché-ridden dialogue. The visuals, often touted as a highlight in big-budget films, are shockingly underwhelming here. The special effects are dated, and the action sequences are predictable and uninspired, offering no sense of thrill or innovation.
Even the soundtrack fails to enhance the experience, feeling disconnected and forgettable. The film attempts to evoke nostalgia and urgency but comes across as desperate rather than impactful. It misses the mark on delivering either meaningful commentary or genuine entertainment.
Overall, Emergency 2025 is a massive disappointment, squandering its potential and leaving viewers frustrated. If you value your time and money, give this one a miss.
The subject of the movie is why I went to watch it, as this wasn't taught at school, the movie was very underwhelming though. The movie felt like a non-stop series of events in rapid succession. Before one could grasp what was happening at a particular time period depicted in the movie, it was already on to the next one! For people like me who don't know the complete history from that time, this movie did not feel very informative. Names of characters could have been shown at certain places. The weird thing was the dubbing of the French and some Bengali dialogues! Never before have I seen such a thing in a movie. It looks like the dialogues were not given a proper thought and dubbing was added as a post thought. The makers could have easily included hindi translations for the Bengali and French dialogues. The second half of the movie was more well-defined than the first one. Overall, a boring experience.
Kangana Ranaut's Emergency promised to be a bold and gripping take on one of the darkest periods in Indian political history. However, the execution leaves much to be desired, as the film falters on multiple fronts, from its skewed historical narrative to lackluster direction and acting.
The film's premise, centered around the controversial Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi in 1975, had the potential to offer an insightful exploration of a politically charged and complex era. Unfortunately, Kangana's portrayal of historical events feels overly dramatized and riddled with inaccuracies. Instead of delivering a nuanced and balanced account, the film leans heavily on a one-sided perspective, sacrificing historical depth for sensationalism.
As a director, Kangana struggles to maintain a coherent narrative. The pacing is uneven, with certain key events either rushed or stretched unnecessarily. Scenes that should carry emotional weight often fall flat due to poor transitions and an overall lack of subtlety. The dialogue, peppered with melodrama, further detracts from the story's credibility.
Kangana's performance as Indira Gandhi also disappoints. While she undoubtedly puts in the effort to embody the former Prime Minister, her portrayal comes across as superficial and inconsistent. The lack of emotional depth in her acting makes it hard to connect with her character, leaving the audience unengaged.
The supporting cast, though competent, is underutilized, with their characters reduced to mere caricatures. This further highlights the film's failure to delve into the complexities of the Emergency period and its impact on diverse sections of society.
On a technical level, Emergency fares slightly better, with its cinematography and production design doing justice to the era it depicts. However, these elements cannot compensate for the film's fundamental shortcomings in storytelling and characterization.
Overall, Emergency is an ambitious project that misses the mark. While Kangana's intention to tackle a pivotal chapter in India's history is commendable, her flawed take on the subject, coupled with sloppy direction and an underwhelming performance, makes for a disappointing cinematic experience. A more balanced and well-researched approach might have elevated the film, but as it stands, Emergency feels like a missed opportunity.
The film's premise, centered around the controversial Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi in 1975, had the potential to offer an insightful exploration of a politically charged and complex era. Unfortunately, Kangana's portrayal of historical events feels overly dramatized and riddled with inaccuracies. Instead of delivering a nuanced and balanced account, the film leans heavily on a one-sided perspective, sacrificing historical depth for sensationalism.
As a director, Kangana struggles to maintain a coherent narrative. The pacing is uneven, with certain key events either rushed or stretched unnecessarily. Scenes that should carry emotional weight often fall flat due to poor transitions and an overall lack of subtlety. The dialogue, peppered with melodrama, further detracts from the story's credibility.
Kangana's performance as Indira Gandhi also disappoints. While she undoubtedly puts in the effort to embody the former Prime Minister, her portrayal comes across as superficial and inconsistent. The lack of emotional depth in her acting makes it hard to connect with her character, leaving the audience unengaged.
The supporting cast, though competent, is underutilized, with their characters reduced to mere caricatures. This further highlights the film's failure to delve into the complexities of the Emergency period and its impact on diverse sections of society.
On a technical level, Emergency fares slightly better, with its cinematography and production design doing justice to the era it depicts. However, these elements cannot compensate for the film's fundamental shortcomings in storytelling and characterization.
Overall, Emergency is an ambitious project that misses the mark. While Kangana's intention to tackle a pivotal chapter in India's history is commendable, her flawed take on the subject, coupled with sloppy direction and an underwhelming performance, makes for a disappointing cinematic experience. A more balanced and well-researched approach might have elevated the film, but as it stands, Emergency feels like a missed opportunity.
To truly appreciate this movie, you need to understand our country's history. It presents her story with raw authenticity.
As a historical drama, the film delves deep into the events surrounding the Emergency of 1975, shedding light on the political upheaval and its profound impact on ordinary citizens.
The movie effectively highlights how politics and politicians have the power to shape a country's socio-economic landscape, for better or worse, through their actions and decisions.
Kangana's portrayal of Indira Ji is, in my opinion, one of her finest performances to date, powerful and deeply compelling.
As a historical drama, the film delves deep into the events surrounding the Emergency of 1975, shedding light on the political upheaval and its profound impact on ordinary citizens.
The movie effectively highlights how politics and politicians have the power to shape a country's socio-economic landscape, for better or worse, through their actions and decisions.
Kangana's portrayal of Indira Ji is, in my opinion, one of her finest performances to date, powerful and deeply compelling.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesKangana Ranaut wears a prosthetic nose to enhance her portrayal of the former Prime Minister.
- Citas
Pupul Jayakar: The easiest way to fall down is to let go of those who were there with you from the beginning.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Emergency?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 147.371 US$
- Duración2 horas 26 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta