Un documental del Epoch Times revela la verdad que se ha ocultado al pueblo estadounidense.Un documental del Epoch Times revela la verdad que se ha ocultado al pueblo estadounidense.Un documental del Epoch Times revela la verdad que se ha ocultado al pueblo estadounidense.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Reseñas destacadas
There was no bombshells in this documentary. They criticized that some video evidence that could possibly be exculpatory to some of the defendants was not provided to them. There was 144,000 hours. If their lawyers worked round the clock for 1,833 days, maybe they might have found it. There was acknowledgement of the violence & it started by the protesters. A lot that happened was never mentioned. The police beaten with flagpoles & fire extinguishers. They talked about the chemical repellents, but only by the cops. Failed to mention the many protesters that came with bear spray, body armor & some with zip ties.. No telling about the rioters who defalcated & smeared it everywhere. Was surprised considering the right leaning of Epoch Times they didn't push the conspiracies that it was Antifa of an FBI inside job. The cops used less than lethal measures, but even then there is always the possibility of someone being injured. Wasn't like it was Kent State. Ashlee Babbit was one of the first ones breaking into the chambers while the members were still being evacuated. She is not a martyr.
I had the chance to watch this documentary at a friend's house. I dont really follow american politics but hey who hasnt heard of the events of january 6?
So: the footage they got is simply stunning. This is the main reason I'm giving it 8 stars and why I'd strongly recommend people to watch it.
Interviewees are the classic experts you would expect to see on screen. Main issue: some of the explanations th ey provide are rather complicated, technical and frankly... boring.
It would have helped to have some animation, infographic, more text on screen, whatever... to help assimilate that terminology.
I'd say the train that drives the narration is: how could all those people enter the building so easily?
The overall structure of the doc is simple but effective: questions, footage, considerations, interviews... more questions, more footage... you get the idea.
The host has a deep and calming voice and the scenes where he is doing stuff around help to breath and digest.
Overall too long though. Might be me but it's tough to get to the end without feeling overwhelmed.
So: the footage they got is simply stunning. This is the main reason I'm giving it 8 stars and why I'd strongly recommend people to watch it.
Interviewees are the classic experts you would expect to see on screen. Main issue: some of the explanations th ey provide are rather complicated, technical and frankly... boring.
It would have helped to have some animation, infographic, more text on screen, whatever... to help assimilate that terminology.
I'd say the train that drives the narration is: how could all those people enter the building so easily?
The overall structure of the doc is simple but effective: questions, footage, considerations, interviews... more questions, more footage... you get the idea.
The host has a deep and calming voice and the scenes where he is doing stuff around help to breath and digest.
Overall too long though. Might be me but it's tough to get to the end without feeling overwhelmed.
So looking at other reviews you can clearly see the writers bias and what way they lean politically. That being said this points out some interesting moments in time during the riots and gives as bit of insight of what may have gone down on Jan 6th but 100% the truth you be the judge.
It is interesting the video and the narrative that the people give in this documentary. I don't think some facts and the light this shows on the videos can be disputed, however after re-watching parts of this, it does leave some open questions and those I will not bring up in this.
I am going to say that I do not lean right or left, but right is right and wrong is wrong is where I am basing this review and you will have to make up you own mind given some of the "facts" given and what you hear the commentators say.
Overall this brings up some very good points and that just maybe this is pretty close to the truth of what really happened on Jan 6th.
You have to watch this and be objective I think if you do that you will get at least something out of it .
In Addition I think no matter what side of the fence you stand on , if you watch this with a open mind you will walk away a little better informed and will be able to formulate some good questions and opinions. If you go into this with a closed mind and think you already its garbage or 100% the truth (like a lot of the reviews on here) then watch it just don't give a Biased review because your trying to change someones mind, let them make it up for themselves.
To summarize I got a lot out of watching this and I think its worth your time it may give you a better understanding of some things.
It is interesting the video and the narrative that the people give in this documentary. I don't think some facts and the light this shows on the videos can be disputed, however after re-watching parts of this, it does leave some open questions and those I will not bring up in this.
I am going to say that I do not lean right or left, but right is right and wrong is wrong is where I am basing this review and you will have to make up you own mind given some of the "facts" given and what you hear the commentators say.
Overall this brings up some very good points and that just maybe this is pretty close to the truth of what really happened on Jan 6th.
You have to watch this and be objective I think if you do that you will get at least something out of it .
In Addition I think no matter what side of the fence you stand on , if you watch this with a open mind you will walk away a little better informed and will be able to formulate some good questions and opinions. If you go into this with a closed mind and think you already its garbage or 100% the truth (like a lot of the reviews on here) then watch it just don't give a Biased review because your trying to change someones mind, let them make it up for themselves.
To summarize I got a lot out of watching this and I think its worth your time it may give you a better understanding of some things.
OK...Let's try to rewrite history. So you can attack police but they aren't supposed to defend themselves. What a bunch of ... I don't have anything else to say but as a Veteran I'm I disgusted that people don't think this was an insurrection!! Insurrection. Police officers died. How can you say it's OK to break into a government building. Officers were clearly there telling them to get out. If you have to break a eindow to get in you clearly should not be there. People need to be held accountable for their actions no matter who "started' it. You are like a bunch of little kids fighting, "but he started it!!c.
If only a group representing both parties could question people under oath. I'd believe their answers over anything that is a produced "documentary."
I also believe the warnings given by former advisers and cabinet members. They were in the room for this and many other situations. They are openly warning us.
A darkness initiated what had to be defended as a consequence.
Were there people who walked calmly through the building? Yes. So How did they get in? Was ann allowed in initially. No. Force was used. Then defense was used. One even entered knowing a weapon was aimed directly at the point of entry, thereby giving mortal warning that entry was not permitted.
Way too many who worked side by side with those who perpetrated these actions have warned us. And way too many people have said they voted or said things they know weren't true, out of fear of retribution.
This darkness will always be defeated with the tiniest bit of light.
I also believe the warnings given by former advisers and cabinet members. They were in the room for this and many other situations. They are openly warning us.
A darkness initiated what had to be defended as a consequence.
Were there people who walked calmly through the building? Yes. So How did they get in? Was ann allowed in initially. No. Force was used. Then defense was used. One even entered knowing a weapon was aimed directly at the point of entry, thereby giving mortal warning that entry was not permitted.
Way too many who worked side by side with those who perpetrated these actions have warned us. And way too many people have said they voted or said things they know weren't true, out of fear of retribution.
This darkness will always be defeated with the tiniest bit of light.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Real Story of January 6?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Real Story of January 6
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 200.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración1 hora 42 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the French language plot outline for The Real Story of January 6 (2022)?
Responde