Paradise

No pun intended - actually one might say puns. But let's not get ahead of ourselves! What is life or a movie if we skip stuff - if we are made to fast forward? Or go back? Time and age wise! There are a lot of questions the movie is asking - very obvious ones (should we sacrifice so called regular folk to enrich our culture with geniuess? Make them live longer?) ... but I would argue that it doesn't really answer them ... it does go off into different directions.

That all being said, this is an intriguing concept ... try not to get hung up on ... well technicalities (again sorry for the pun). This is meant to be ... well meant to be entertainment first, while also giving you food for thought. What would you do? And does every technology benefit the rich? Who can be deemed ... well unnecessary? Isn't every life worth something? Still if someone would want to give away ... there is a whole bag of issues there. One being that person may change their mind ... no backsies I assume.

I like that the filmmakers took a chance and went for it. With Kostja they have a very charismatic lead ... he walks a very line about what he wants, about being a fighter for justice ... and trying to handle what his significant other may want ... all the while playing god of sorts ... there are many twists and turns ... some make more some make less sense ... just suspend your disbelief ...

I think that Germany is a step ahead here in Europe, lots of European production such as the French one or the Italian one are still attached at the old way of doing cinema, such as Nouvelle vague or Neorealism, Germany during these last few years has demonstrated that has a lot to offer, Dark, Kleo, 1989 and now Paradise. It was not a perfect movie, but it was not predictable and it perfectly show how fragile human nature is and how humans way of thinking can change.

The main protagonist really did an amazing job, his character is very well written like the rest of the script. I wouldn't mind if they do a sequel to this movie. If you liked In time, you'll definitely like this one!

This Netflix movie is a sham, a deceptive package. It pretends to be an interesting socio-critical study of the future in the science fiction genre, however it touches this subject in the first 15 minutes of the movie, then forgets about it. After that it frays into a dull thriller plot, which is poorly executed and rather boring.

The movie is superficial and never ever takes his intended theme seriously, it only exploits it, if even. Basically, it's about a future in which rich people buy the lifetime of poor people (sounds familiar? Justin Timberlake sends his regards "In Time"). Sadly enough, this interesting premise is quickly dropped completely. After all, you could be stepping on the toes of the Netflix shareholders, and you don't want to do that, right? Or even other californian tech-enterpreneurs, who are famous for financing startups that plan to extend human lifespan at an extreme costs (only accessible for the richest of the rich, of course), and are probably friends with Hastings & Co.

No, the rich and the famous time buyers are left untouched. Instead, the film leads into a really dull kidnapping story resulting in a chase, first over land, then over sea, then over land again, finally ending in a dark cold hotel somewhere deep in the Lithuanian forest, where the protagonists then mumble those typical German moral dialogues into their sad faces.

In the final act, the writers finally seem to have run out of ideas: there is a completely pointless shoot-out (action scenes for the trailer, as ordered by Netflix). This is followed by one or two plot twists from your standard guide for beginners in screenwriting, as can be found in your next Walmart store. Twists that have zero coherence with the characters.

The characters follow the plot, not the other way round; they are mere compliant slaves of the plot. How the makers of this mediocre work could actually believe that modern viewers would go along this kind of infantil mockery is a mystery to me.

To sum it up: does anyone remember those DVD/VHS covers of cheap B-Pictures from the 90s, with those funny collages of fiery explosions, muscular heroes with big guns and sexy long-legged girls in high heels? And then you watched the movie, and it was just low-budget garbage of guys with mustaches, fighting each other in stone pits or in the desert, C-grade actors running around to cheap music, with a plot that didn't make any sense? That's "paradise", just with a budget of 10 Million Dollars. A hollow package with a sugar coating.

Soulless entertainment for the low-income masses who can't afford a cinema ticket.

But hey Netflix, wake up: even they will be annoyed and feel ripped off, even they won't recommend their friends to buy a Netflix subscription after this. After all, you stole their lifetime! And they ain't getting it back, unlike the skinny woman in the movie.

When you bought that B-Picture VHS cassette seduced by the cover, your money was gone, the producers had it, said thank you and bought another red or black Chevy Corvette with it, to go for a ride with their pimp friends. That scam worked.

With the subscription system, it won't go down like that. Nobody ain't gonna subscribe nothing 'cos of some fake covers.

A rather dull approach to an interesting subject.

Unfortunately, neither of the characters emerge as multi-faceted human beings, they simply pop out of the script like two-dimensional caricatures, and while the cast does its best to bring these personae to life, their hard work can only go so far in carrying a piece that doesn't hold its ground.

With a few plot twists, the movie tries to gain our attention, but they appear predictable by the time we've finished watching the film.

Despite introducing us to a formidable antagonist, the CEO of the evil AEON corporation, who's capable of eliminating innocent lives for her own profits and interest, we don't get to know much about her either, and the whole characterisation falls flat. Neither does her character design present her as a grey shadowed presence, nor does it do much to make the viewer hate her.

Even the opposing fraction ADAM fighting against AEON is led by a woman with firm beliefs, but that side of the story doesn't contribute anything except bodies dropping left and right. It ultimately leaves us with a question - what really was the point of it all, if neither the negative forces leading the controversial ageist agenda had anything to speak for themselves, nor the resistance party trying to reinstate the status quo.

Although classism and ageism are the obvious themes being dealt by the movie, the social commentary in that arena also feels very thin, resulting in merely a crumbling down of the whole idea that could've created a larger than life image, but never does.

Personally, I was looking forward to this release owing to my own cravings of a good science fiction thriller, but again that ship has sailed without leaving me with much to remember in the end.

Unfortunately, Boris Kunz's feature has only resulted in a run-of-the-mill forgettable viewing experience. As much as I wanted to like this one, it didn't really hand out a significantly building up narrative, nor did it lay out worthy character developments. Its sole dark vision of a society falling apart with a classist billion-dollar company set up at the centre only brings out the obvious view of a dystopian setting, but nothing more than that.

Initially, the German film pushes a great deal to cement its foregrounding issues about the socio-economic divide between different classes of society, ageism, relationships, technological advancements overtaking emotional human ground and more.

But in the end, it reels out a dystopian concept merely on the surface, as a selling point. It lacks profundity and fails to ask the right questions.

This movie had everything to be great. The premise was good, to say the least, the beginning was exciting, the performances committed and the course chosen pointed in the direction of something really prosperous.

In addition, the ethical issues raised by a group called Adam, which violently opposes the shady methods of manipulating the life span of the poor in exchange for money , run by the AEON company, are extremely valid and provide material for a realistic reflection on a possible future that lies ahead of our time. In fact, this discussion would have been the best thing in the movie if the script had gone down this road.

But halfway through the movie the script becomes a seesaw with so many ups and downs. The story loses its breath and becomes a little lame. It improves a little with the reappearance of the terrorist core Adam, adding some action to the lukewarm script, but it falls off again with poor script choices as the film nears its climax.

When personal moral dilemmas that don't quite fit appear out of nowhere, things turn lukewarm again and the movie goes downhill again. And so it goes until the end. It's not bad and keeps the interest, but good wasted characters and an undefined script about where it wants to go, partially spoil what could have been great. In the end, it leaves a slight hook for a possible continuation.