Vito Genovese y Frank Costello, una pareja de italoamericanos que dirigen dos familias del crimen distintas a mediados del siglo XX. Genovese intentó asesinar a Costello en 1957, aunque éste... Leer todoVito Genovese y Frank Costello, una pareja de italoamericanos que dirigen dos familias del crimen distintas a mediados del siglo XX. Genovese intentó asesinar a Costello en 1957, aunque éste se retiró de la mafia.Vito Genovese y Frank Costello, una pareja de italoamericanos que dirigen dos familias del crimen distintas a mediados del siglo XX. Genovese intentó asesinar a Costello en 1957, aunque éste se retiró de la mafia.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio y 1 nominación en total
Reseñas destacadas
I watched this thinking it will be rubbish because of the low ratings. It's nowhere near as bad as the reviews say. It was more entertaining than the Irishman, which was really boring. The acting was good and some scenes were very entertaining with the sharp dialogue. You kind of feel bad for Deniro getting these negative reactions when he did a really good job playing two characters convincingly. Yeah it won't be the best mob movie you will watch but definitely doesn't deserve the negative ratings here. If you like mob history of this era you would be mad to miss this and stupid to be easily influenced by Deniro haters.
I don't see why all the "hate" for this movie. It's a decent mafia movie. Not great, not terrible. I see people complaining that De Niro shouldn't been playing two characters, especially the main characters. I think he did a good job, which shows his incredible talent of getting into different characters. Yes, you could see it's the same person, the difference was not big, Frank Costello and Vito Genovese didn't look alike but you could see who was who in the movie.
It's not the typical, highly violent mafia movie we're used to and perhaps that's why it doesn't get up there in the top. It's hard to compare it to the classics. I remind you that The Irishman was also different from what we're used to when it comes to mafia movies, De Niro and Scorsese. But that's how it is, they can't make the same format of movies because we'd get bored of it.
This movie stands in its own, and shouldn't be compared with the classics. It's a different approach.
Anyway, like I said, it's not a masterpiece nor a fiasco. It's a good, decent movie for people interested in the mafia/gangster genre.
It's not the typical, highly violent mafia movie we're used to and perhaps that's why it doesn't get up there in the top. It's hard to compare it to the classics. I remind you that The Irishman was also different from what we're used to when it comes to mafia movies, De Niro and Scorsese. But that's how it is, they can't make the same format of movies because we'd get bored of it.
This movie stands in its own, and shouldn't be compared with the classics. It's a different approach.
Anyway, like I said, it's not a masterpiece nor a fiasco. It's a good, decent movie for people interested in the mafia/gangster genre.
The Alto Knights-
In Cinemas now
My Rating - 6/10
I wondered why and how a Robert Di Niro movie based on a true story about two rival New York organised Crime bosses directed by Barry Levinson could possibly flop at the box office?
Is it because there's been so many movies along similar lines starring Robert Di Niro like The Irishman 2019, Goodfellas 1990, The Godfather 11 1974, A Bronx Tail 1993, The Untouchables 1987, and Once Upon a Time in America 1984 etc?
Perhaps audiences are a bit tired of mafioso and gangsters however for me the reason The Alto Knights is inferior to the above listed movies is misplaced ego .
By that I mean as fine an actor as DeNiro is playing two roles in one movie especially when the only difference basically is a different nose and chin only confuses the characters for the audience and is a stretch to far.
I found myself trying to differentiate between the two main characters Frank Costello and Vito Genovese both played well by Robert DeNiro however it would have been better separate actors played each role .
After all they're not even related but look like twins , it's just a silly casting choice.
The story meanders also back and forth and doesn't have much impact at all.
It's basically the story of 2 gangland bosses on a collision course as told by Frank Costello married to Bobbie played very well by Debra Messing ,nice to see her in a dramatic role.
The usual scenario of gangland violence as the 2 men who were friends as teenagers vie for control of the drug trafficking and alcohol supply on New Yorks city's streets.
Once best friends, petty jealousies and a series of betrayals set them on a deadly collision course.
For me this is a straight to streaming movie.
I wondered why and how a Robert Di Niro movie based on a true story about two rival New York organised Crime bosses directed by Barry Levinson could possibly flop at the box office?
Is it because there's been so many movies along similar lines starring Robert Di Niro like The Irishman 2019, Goodfellas 1990, The Godfather 11 1974, A Bronx Tail 1993, The Untouchables 1987, and Once Upon a Time in America 1984 etc?
Perhaps audiences are a bit tired of mafioso and gangsters however for me the reason The Alto Knights is inferior to the above listed movies is misplaced ego .
By that I mean as fine an actor as DeNiro is playing two roles in one movie especially when the only difference basically is a different nose and chin only confuses the characters for the audience and is a stretch to far.
I found myself trying to differentiate between the two main characters Frank Costello and Vito Genovese both played well by Robert DeNiro however it would have been better separate actors played each role .
After all they're not even related but look like twins , it's just a silly casting choice.
The story meanders also back and forth and doesn't have much impact at all.
It's basically the story of 2 gangland bosses on a collision course as told by Frank Costello married to Bobbie played very well by Debra Messing ,nice to see her in a dramatic role.
The usual scenario of gangland violence as the 2 men who were friends as teenagers vie for control of the drug trafficking and alcohol supply on New Yorks city's streets.
Once best friends, petty jealousies and a series of betrayals set them on a deadly collision course.
For me this is a straight to streaming movie.
It is a most grievous thing to witness a once-mighty prince reduced to a shadow of his former self, shuffling through the corridors of power like a weary sovereign clinging to a throne he no longer commands. Such is the state of Robert De Niro in The Alto Knights, a film that aspires to the grandeur of past crime epics but instead finds itself wandering aimlessly, much like its aging protagonist.
De Niro, once the lion of this genre, now moves with the sluggish gait of a ruler who refuses to acknowledge the rise of younger, sharper heirs. His presence, once commanding, now elicits pity rather than fear. The fire that once burned in Goodfellas and Casino has been reduced to embers, and no amount of nostalgic reverence can conceal the fact that his time as a cinematic warlord has passed.
The film itself is a relic-an artifact that would have found a comfortable home in the theaters of a bygone era but now serves only as a reminder that not all battles should be fought. Had the producers possessed true cunning, they would have sent this directly to streaming, where it might have at least avoided the indignity of public scrutiny in the coliseum of the box office. Instead, they have placed it before the masses, unarmored and unfit for the duel.
A wise ruler knows when to retreat, to consolidate power elsewhere, and to leave the battlefield before his once-loyal subjects begin whispering of his frailty. De Niro, and indeed this film, would have done well to heed such wisdom.
De Niro, once the lion of this genre, now moves with the sluggish gait of a ruler who refuses to acknowledge the rise of younger, sharper heirs. His presence, once commanding, now elicits pity rather than fear. The fire that once burned in Goodfellas and Casino has been reduced to embers, and no amount of nostalgic reverence can conceal the fact that his time as a cinematic warlord has passed.
The film itself is a relic-an artifact that would have found a comfortable home in the theaters of a bygone era but now serves only as a reminder that not all battles should be fought. Had the producers possessed true cunning, they would have sent this directly to streaming, where it might have at least avoided the indignity of public scrutiny in the coliseum of the box office. Instead, they have placed it before the masses, unarmored and unfit for the duel.
A wise ruler knows when to retreat, to consolidate power elsewhere, and to leave the battlefield before his once-loyal subjects begin whispering of his frailty. De Niro, and indeed this film, would have done well to heed such wisdom.
I saw the reviews of this and was surprised how negative they were.
I was always going to see it.
The critic in The Metro paper in the UK goes on about how old the film makers are,is this relevant?
I agree with her the film could be better but it is still a good watch.
I like this sort of film but am not an expert on the history of the story and viewers don't need to be.
Sending a reviewer who doesn't like gangster films to see a gangster film seems wrong.
I give no spoilers but the film reminded me of Once Upon A Time In America.
It is not as good as that film but this is still a quality production from a justly respected director.
The production design and costume design in this are excellent.
You believe you are in the 1950s.
I didn't notice any body using modern language either.
The soundtrack was great as well,I hope it is available on cd.
What about the script you ask? Well the script is fine,it tells a complicated story well.
The acting is great.
People playing older people look older.
I was not very familiar with all the cast but I was impressed with all the performances.
If anyone who likes this sort of film they should ignore the negative reviews and go and see it.
You believe.
I was always going to see it.
The critic in The Metro paper in the UK goes on about how old the film makers are,is this relevant?
I agree with her the film could be better but it is still a good watch.
I like this sort of film but am not an expert on the history of the story and viewers don't need to be.
Sending a reviewer who doesn't like gangster films to see a gangster film seems wrong.
I give no spoilers but the film reminded me of Once Upon A Time In America.
It is not as good as that film but this is still a quality production from a justly respected director.
The production design and costume design in this are excellent.
You believe you are in the 1950s.
I didn't notice any body using modern language either.
The soundtrack was great as well,I hope it is available on cd.
What about the script you ask? Well the script is fine,it tells a complicated story well.
The acting is great.
People playing older people look older.
I was not very familiar with all the cast but I was impressed with all the performances.
If anyone who likes this sort of film they should ignore the negative reviews and go and see it.
You believe.
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
These big screen releases can now be watched from the comfort of your couch.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesMarlon Brando had said he had based his raspy voice portrayal of Don Vito Corleone in El padrino (1972) on Frank Costello's voice as heard from hearings aired on TV. Robert De Niro who also played a young Vito Corleone in El padrino parte II (1974) goes full circle and portrays Frank Costello. However, in this film they stayed away Costello's raspy voice imitation.
- PifiasIn the barber shop when a character is shot, there are two shooters firing at him. Even though both assassins use six-shooter revolvers and never reload, meaning max. 12 shots could be fired, more than 20 shots are heard.
- ConexionesFeatures Al rojo vivo (1949)
- Banda sonoraThat Old Black Magic
Written by Harold Arlen and Johnny Mercer
Performed by Louis Prima and Keely Smith
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Alto Knights?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Alto Knights: Mafia y poder
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 45.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 6.103.664 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 3.165.349 US$
- 23 mar 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 10.103.664 US$
- Duración
- 2h 3min(123 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta