Titans: The Rise of Hollywood
- Serie de TV
- 2022
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaThe story of immigrants who founded first Hollywood studios.The story of immigrants who founded first Hollywood studios.The story of immigrants who founded first Hollywood studios.
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
I was really worried when I started this that it would be cheesy and shallow. Now as many others said. The recreations were horrible and wooden. But especially the early episodes are very very interesting about the exchanges and how Edison had somehow created a monopoly. Edison was well known for suing the hell out of anyone that he thought was not paying him for his inventions. But luckily he over reached with the movies and ended up losing. The music was so bad through out especially the music for the introduction for each episode. But this is a definite watch for anyone that likes movies.
While packed with enough Hollywood history to make even the most avid movie goer salivate, this series falls short in almost all other categories. The acting is wooden and shallow. Why they decided to use a narrator who sounds like Peter Falk is unanswerable. If you close your eyes, you'll swear you're watching the Princess Bride. Overall, it plays like an 8th grade attempt at docudrama. Watch for the history or don't bother.
The rise of the Hollywood moguls is as entertaining as many of its movies, filled with fascinating rags to riches stories. And this series digs up a number of lesser known episodes among those otherwise well known. For example, Carl Laemmle's contribution has never been so well documented. And the storytelling style works.
But, despite its surface polish, it feels undernurished and low budget. The number of repeated shots becomes annoying; surely they could find some other visuals from somehere. Ads for early IMP films mention them being shot in Cuba, before the storyline gets us there. Sloppy.
Those early years will always enthrall, so it's worth a watch. But it's not quite there.
But, despite its surface polish, it feels undernurished and low budget. The number of repeated shots becomes annoying; surely they could find some other visuals from somehere. Ads for early IMP films mention them being shot in Cuba, before the storyline gets us there. Sloppy.
Those early years will always enthrall, so it's worth a watch. But it's not quite there.
There were four Warner brothers, not three. Co-founder Albert is nowhere to be found or even mentioned. It's as if he didn't exist. Albert Warner headed all of Warner Bros. Distribution in New York with my grandfather Samuel Schneider (who was vice president and treasurer on the board). Albert and Sam were the first of the brothers to get into the movie business, before Harry and Jack joined them. A major mistake in this series.
United Artists was founded by four movie icons, not three. In addition to Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and Charlie Chaplin, all shown in the series, they entirely left out D. W. Griffith. His career, impact, and legacy are completely gone. No "Birth of a Nation" or "Intolerance." None of his legendary work with Lillian Gish (who is also conspicuously absent). But to spend a good amount of time on the forming of United Artists and not even mention Griffith's name isn't just an error, it's revisionist history. It's just plain wrong.
The budget is low, except apparently for purchasing cartons of cigarettes. The younger actor playing Adolph Zukor was never without a cigarette in any shot or scene. EVER. It went beyond a chain-smoking vice or character trait into completely distracting and amateurish, like a bad joke or exaggerated nervous tick.
I appreciate the effort, and it's a story worth telling, so I'm glad this series exists. Many fascinating people, tales, and details are presented, but with some huge, glaring errors (mentioned above), it makes me doubt and question the truth in all of it.
United Artists was founded by four movie icons, not three. In addition to Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and Charlie Chaplin, all shown in the series, they entirely left out D. W. Griffith. His career, impact, and legacy are completely gone. No "Birth of a Nation" or "Intolerance." None of his legendary work with Lillian Gish (who is also conspicuously absent). But to spend a good amount of time on the forming of United Artists and not even mention Griffith's name isn't just an error, it's revisionist history. It's just plain wrong.
The budget is low, except apparently for purchasing cartons of cigarettes. The younger actor playing Adolph Zukor was never without a cigarette in any shot or scene. EVER. It went beyond a chain-smoking vice or character trait into completely distracting and amateurish, like a bad joke or exaggerated nervous tick.
I appreciate the effort, and it's a story worth telling, so I'm glad this series exists. Many fascinating people, tales, and details are presented, but with some huge, glaring errors (mentioned above), it makes me doubt and question the truth in all of it.
As others have commented, the history itself is the star of this show. The presentation is subpar - especially when considering the subject. I tried to research if it was AI generated and could not get a definitive yes or no. I'm leaning toward a yes. There's something OFF about it, but the history presented is edifying.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Hollywood - Aufstieg der Titanen
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta