Con la catastrófica regresión de su hijo adoptivo, Lexi, una abogada de pueblo, se enfrenta a la realidad del fraude empresarial al más alto nivel. Conseguirá hacer rendir cuentas a una gran... Leer todoCon la catastrófica regresión de su hijo adoptivo, Lexi, una abogada de pueblo, se enfrenta a la realidad del fraude empresarial al más alto nivel. Conseguirá hacer rendir cuentas a una gran empresa en esta auténtica historia de denuncia?Con la catastrófica regresión de su hijo adoptivo, Lexi, una abogada de pueblo, se enfrenta a la realidad del fraude empresarial al más alto nivel. Conseguirá hacer rendir cuentas a una gran empresa en esta auténtica historia de denuncia?
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 15 premios en total
Reseñas destacadas
Amazing movie that sheds light on the hidden world of big pharma and the power these entities hold over due process. An absolute must watch for anyone who has kids, is planning to have kids or values their own life.
It's great to see a movie that forges ahead to seek and transmit truth to those who may not otherwise have the time or ability to do it on their own.
This movie presents so many facets and challenges that we face in modern society in a way that is truly about helping the average person. It is not about catering to the powers that be but about standing up for what is right for people who don't have a voice.
It's great to see a movie that forges ahead to seek and transmit truth to those who may not otherwise have the time or ability to do it on their own.
This movie presents so many facets and challenges that we face in modern society in a way that is truly about helping the average person. It is not about catering to the powers that be but about standing up for what is right for people who don't have a voice.
It is not anti-science to assert that much of "science" done today by Big Pharma is corrupt.
Andy walks us through a story, showing how the corporate pressures to make profits are putting our children's health at risk.
He shows how many who are now "anti-vaxxers" were very much pro-vaccine until their child was injured *right after* a "wellness visit."
People can make ad-hominem attacks all they want. Such attacks are a known category of logical fallacy for a reason.
Watch with an open mind. Afterwards, read Euripides' substack to see how Big Pharma launched a massive attack to discredit Dr. Wakefield.
All in all, great work by Andy.
Andy walks us through a story, showing how the corporate pressures to make profits are putting our children's health at risk.
He shows how many who are now "anti-vaxxers" were very much pro-vaccine until their child was injured *right after* a "wellness visit."
People can make ad-hominem attacks all they want. Such attacks are a known category of logical fallacy for a reason.
Watch with an open mind. Afterwards, read Euripides' substack to see how Big Pharma launched a massive attack to discredit Dr. Wakefield.
All in all, great work by Andy.
I had a view of the inside seat in 2002 when Wakefield was sacked for his findings. It looked very much like a hit job on him to avoid him ruining a multi-billion dollar income stream for pharmaceutical companies.
Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.
Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)
Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?
Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.
Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)
Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?
I thought the acting was outstanding. If you have been vaccine injured or have a family member in that position there will be some part which resonates no matter whether it was the MMR as in this story, or another vax (or redefined vax). Family relationships and the effects vaccine injuries have on the family dynamic for those who are living the hell caused by fraudulent motives of Pharmaceutical companies to make money no matter the cost to physical health is especially moving. True to life because it's based on a whistleblowers evidence. I wish it had been able to show the outcomes on company employees who messed up.
Well done Mr. Wakefield and cast! 👍
Well done Mr. Wakefield and cast! 👍
At last the truth is out. Big Pharma, the government, and corporate medicine can't cover up the dangers of modern vaccine production any longer. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Is a whistleblower ahead of his time. Beware if you are forced into getting a jab! Ask questions. Do your own research. The acting and script were easy to follow, even for a layman. Showing what goes on behind the scenes at drug companies is a public service. Doctors spouting medical tropes with no regard for the rights of individual patients was terrifying but true. Dramatizing the actual deposition testimony was brilliant. The audience was deeply engaged.
¿Sabías que...?
- Citas
Josh Koprowski: [from trailer] No one will ever believe them again.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Protocol-7?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Protocol-7
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 38 minutos
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta