Tras un virus que mata a la mayoría de los adultos, unos niños huérfanos viajan al sur, donde se enfrentan a una mujer psicópata que oculta un oscuro secreto.Tras un virus que mata a la mayoría de los adultos, unos niños huérfanos viajan al sur, donde se enfrentan a una mujer psicópata que oculta un oscuro secreto.Tras un virus que mata a la mayoría de los adultos, unos niños huérfanos viajan al sur, donde se enfrentan a una mujer psicópata que oculta un oscuro secreto.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Jeff Allen
- Bus Driver
- (sin acreditar)
Algin Mendez
- Store Clerk
- (sin acreditar)
Javier Sernas
- Bus Passenger
- (sin acreditar)
Reseñas destacadas
Cool premise, really liked the idea and the first half kept my interest for sure. But after that it's just dumb character decision after dumb character decision. The acting is okay too but the writing is so bad in the second half that I almost just turned it off.
It's things like when you're getting attacked or held by gun and don't take the gun or subdue the attacker that really make the last 1/3 unwatchable. I was yelling at the TV multiple times because the kid characters are so insufferable and stupid.
It does have some good acting, the premise is cool and some SFX were good too, but the bad writing ruins the whole thing towards the end. 4.2/10.
It's things like when you're getting attacked or held by gun and don't take the gun or subdue the attacker that really make the last 1/3 unwatchable. I was yelling at the TV multiple times because the kid characters are so insufferable and stupid.
It does have some good acting, the premise is cool and some SFX were good too, but the bad writing ruins the whole thing towards the end. 4.2/10.
The movie started off decent for about a minute, but quickly slowed down and lost direction. It felt like it was trying to build toward something, but never really got there. By the end, I was still wondering what the title even had to do with the story. The acting? Pretty rough-but honestly, that's kind of what I expected from a Tubi original.
Nepo nonsense hit new lows with this one. Destry Allen Speilberg delivered a deeply embarrassing, borderline unwatchable cringe fest that didn't offer up a single legit scare.
Some of the cast has talent (actress from Downtown Abbey and Gus from Breaking Bad) and some maybe do but it didn't shine through this garbage. And a Spielberg making a movie with a title encouraging people to not feed children with what's going on in the world right now? Does Destry have absolutely no antenna?
They say the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Destry is a chip off the old block when it comes to making bad movies, just like dad.
Some of the cast has talent (actress from Downtown Abbey and Gus from Breaking Bad) and some maybe do but it didn't shine through this garbage. And a Spielberg making a movie with a title encouraging people to not feed children with what's going on in the world right now? Does Destry have absolutely no antenna?
They say the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Destry is a chip off the old block when it comes to making bad movies, just like dad.
First, being the daughter of a great (mostly) director, doesn't mean the progeny will be a great director. Hence this. Does no one who writes a movie, think beyond the premise? This move comes straight from the weak as hell J. J. Abrams/Alex Kurtzman school of film writing. The premise, a disease that kills adults and affects children, well, let's be honest. The Virus of the week film isn't anything new. How it's done, like lets say the 28 series (NOT ZOMBIE MOVIES!) are brilliant, each evolving in a different way. Now, if this virus is so virulent, how has anyone survived it? (First mistake). The movie doesn't know what it wants to be; is it horror? Suspense? Where are the monsters? How did Michelle Dockery (who looks and acts like an older version of her character from Downton Abbey, and constantly uses the english term 'Sweets' for candy.) Ditto Giancarlo Esposito. This is just a bad, weak movie that runs on the coattails of the director's name. Weak and poor. I can see why it premiered on Tubi.
I am known for my very long reviews. This won't be one of them. Ms. Spielberg, what on earth were you thinking? I don't even know what to say. The synopsis sounded derivative but interesting. The trailer made me curious- but then, this movie?
The plot barely matters because there almost is none. There is exposition in the first 5 minutes including the films title. It serves no purpose- it becomes an afterthought- gives you a hint of a possible story that never materializes. It then gives you unlikeable characters you have no reason to care about, and after seeing cliche after cliche of typical thriller tropes well- the question becomes- why didn't i turn it off?
I didn't because it was Steven Spielberg's daughter's first film and i was hoping it would eventually become more interesting. What's shocking is it actually got worse -- and there was no great metaphor that people "needed to understand" or "didn't get". This is not a deep film. It could have been adults who ended up at the house for the purpose we later discover. There was no twist at the end, only a boring obvious common sense reveal.
The reason given in the first 5 minutes was not based on jealousy/fear but was just an excuse for a scapegoat. Kids don't outlive the adults. The adults have lived years longer already- nor was anyone scared of anyone in this film unless they had a gun pointed at their face. In fact, those 5 minutes seemed like a setup for another movie entirely - and those looking for meaning or metaphors when there were none are foolish.
Please- for your next film, pick up a decent script and a story that's interesting and that would justify becoming a full length movie. Thank you.
The plot barely matters because there almost is none. There is exposition in the first 5 minutes including the films title. It serves no purpose- it becomes an afterthought- gives you a hint of a possible story that never materializes. It then gives you unlikeable characters you have no reason to care about, and after seeing cliche after cliche of typical thriller tropes well- the question becomes- why didn't i turn it off?
I didn't because it was Steven Spielberg's daughter's first film and i was hoping it would eventually become more interesting. What's shocking is it actually got worse -- and there was no great metaphor that people "needed to understand" or "didn't get". This is not a deep film. It could have been adults who ended up at the house for the purpose we later discover. There was no twist at the end, only a boring obvious common sense reveal.
The reason given in the first 5 minutes was not based on jealousy/fear but was just an excuse for a scapegoat. Kids don't outlive the adults. The adults have lived years longer already- nor was anyone scared of anyone in this film unless they had a gun pointed at their face. In fact, those 5 minutes seemed like a setup for another movie entirely - and those looking for meaning or metaphors when there were none are foolish.
Please- for your next film, pick up a decent script and a story that's interesting and that would justify becoming a full length movie. Thank you.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesPremieres on Tubi Tv June 27, 2025
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Please Don't Feed the Children?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 45.031 US$
- Duración
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta