Cuando un frenesí de cinco megalodones atormenta el océano abierto, lo que está en juego nunca ha sido tanto.Cuando un frenesí de cinco megalodones atormenta el océano abierto, lo que está en juego nunca ha sido tanto.Cuando un frenesí de cinco megalodones atormenta el océano abierto, lo que está en juego nunca ha sido tanto.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Imágenes
Jeff Daniels
- Kurt Holt
- (as Jeffery Daniels)
Ben Formella
- Private Hoskins
- (as Benjamin James Formella)
Javier Luna
- Brunson
- (as Javi Luna)
Jordan Hubbard
- Captian Kacey Keele
- (as Jordan R. Hubbard)
Reseñas destacadas
This has to be one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The writing is atrocious, the acting is ridiculous, and the special effects look like they were done for a high school first year project. It's like the entire movie crew did zero research on any subject matter, military and shark behavior. The actors were obviously stumbling over their lines like they had no idea what they were talking about. I love all shark movies even the B type movies from the SyFy channel, but this was worse than anything I've ever seen. Bad acting is usually laughable, but that becomes part of the charm. This bad acting was like a bunch of drunk friends decided to make a movie they knew nothing about.
This movie was bad. And I like low budget movies shark movies. The most irritating thing to me is that there would be scenes of people talking about what they're going to do and why for an unnecessarily long time to the point where you just stop listening. And there were a number of times they did this. Eric Roberts' character made me laugh. His facial expressions had me howling sometimes. The military characters were not believable. I expected the effects to be bad, but when it gets added on top of all the other issues I couldn't look past it. I laughed watching this movie, but I also almost turned it off many times because those long conversations were making me actually mad and impatient.
Eric Roberts looking all cloned up like he's about to have a heart attack or something. He should respectfully retire like Bruce Willis.
Man this movie is sh**"t; failing at trying to replicate meg 2. Its storyline is baseless, CGI effect is trash, the cast comprises nursery/intern amateurs and more annoyingly the whole team looks under-prepared for this movie. Almost like a volunteered probono act sorry to say.
In my opinion, you should watch SpongeBob SquarePants instead of this (My 2cents). Trust me, use those cents for something much more useful. Or play Need for Speed No limit 2015. Don't laugh, I mean this sh...
Man this movie is sh**"t; failing at trying to replicate meg 2. Its storyline is baseless, CGI effect is trash, the cast comprises nursery/intern amateurs and more annoyingly the whole team looks under-prepared for this movie. Almost like a volunteered probono act sorry to say.
In my opinion, you should watch SpongeBob SquarePants instead of this (My 2cents). Trust me, use those cents for something much more useful. Or play Need for Speed No limit 2015. Don't laugh, I mean this sh...
This movie is so bad it's laughable. The acting is atrocious. The effects are bad. But the worst part is the stupidity of whoever wrote the script or maybe it's the continuity or costuming? The military (I use that term loosely), are wearing navy camo and their tag says US Navy....but they repeatedly refer to themselves as Marines. These are NOT the same branches of the military at all and the terms are not interchangeable. Even if nothing else was bad in this movie that would be a big negative to me. Unfortunately everything is bad in this movie. Save yourself! Don't watch this movie.........
The movie sets sail with a cast led by the seasoned Eric Roberts, whose performance as a naval leader is, unfortunately, one of the film's few bright spots. Because, despite his earnest efforts, Roberts' portrayal lacks authenticity, leaving much to be desired. Curiously, he bears an uncanny resemblance to his grandmother, which adds an unintended layer of distraction to his character.
The casting choices for the female leads present another conundrum. Although they aim to play characters twenty to thirty years younger than their actual ages, their amateurish performances break the illusion entirely. Their attempts to portray youthful vigor fall flat, making it difficult to engage with their characters on any meaningful level.
The most glaring issue, however, is the film's CGI. It seems as though the special effects were handled by a teenager with limited experience. The shark attack scenes, meant to be thrilling and suspenseful, are laughably bad. The graphics are outdated, the movements unnatural, and the overall execution is disastrously off the mark. It's almost as if the CGI team was aiming for a retro vibe but missed the target by several decades.
Despite these numerous flaws, there is a faint glimmer of effort detectable throughout the film. The filmmakers appeared to have some semblance of a vision, even if it didn't translate well on screen. For that reason alone, I generously award the film two stars. The attempt to create a compelling movie is evident, but unfortunately, the execution leaves the audience adrift in a sea of disappointment.
In conclusion, it is a misadventure that fails to deliver on its promises. With lackluster performances, abysmal CGI, and a script that doesn't quite hit the mark, it is a film that might be enjoyed for its unintentional humor rather than its intended thrills. Proceed with caution, and perhaps bring a life preserver of low expectations.
The casting choices for the female leads present another conundrum. Although they aim to play characters twenty to thirty years younger than their actual ages, their amateurish performances break the illusion entirely. Their attempts to portray youthful vigor fall flat, making it difficult to engage with their characters on any meaningful level.
The most glaring issue, however, is the film's CGI. It seems as though the special effects were handled by a teenager with limited experience. The shark attack scenes, meant to be thrilling and suspenseful, are laughably bad. The graphics are outdated, the movements unnatural, and the overall execution is disastrously off the mark. It's almost as if the CGI team was aiming for a retro vibe but missed the target by several decades.
Despite these numerous flaws, there is a faint glimmer of effort detectable throughout the film. The filmmakers appeared to have some semblance of a vision, even if it didn't translate well on screen. For that reason alone, I generously award the film two stars. The attempt to create a compelling movie is evident, but unfortunately, the execution leaves the audience adrift in a sea of disappointment.
In conclusion, it is a misadventure that fails to deliver on its promises. With lackluster performances, abysmal CGI, and a script that doesn't quite hit the mark, it is a film that might be enjoyed for its unintentional humor rather than its intended thrills. Proceed with caution, and perhaps bring a life preserver of low expectations.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThere is a slightly longer bloodier cut of the film with a extended beach attack in Mexico.
- PifiasAt no time in the history of the United States of America have the US Marines had any of their own ships. The US Navy is the Uber for the US Marines.
- ConexionesFollows Megalodon Rising (2021)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Megalodon: The Frenzy?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Мегалодон: Божевілля
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- San Pedro, California, Estados Unidos(battleship scenes)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 22 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Italian language plot outline for Megalodon: The Frenzy (2023)?
Responde