Un estudiante de enfermería es atormentado por un trauma pasado que desorienta su vida actual, relaciones, carrera y capacidad de funcionar.Un estudiante de enfermería es atormentado por un trauma pasado que desorienta su vida actual, relaciones, carrera y capacidad de funcionar.Un estudiante de enfermería es atormentado por un trauma pasado que desorienta su vida actual, relaciones, carrera y capacidad de funcionar.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 3 premios y 3 nominaciones en total
Reseñas destacadas
While gathering the left overs of her suicided mother's life, a woman is called away on a live-in carer's job for an old woman in an old house in the countryside. Where she finds a red door to the cellar, guarded by folk charms ...
Not really a horror, but a study in generational paranoid schizophrenia - with folk horror influences: The Wickerman and Penda's Fen come through strong in the climax. The plot device is the taking of children by the Sidhe, fairy entities that appear as goats and as humans too - but which are stand-ins for altogether more material demons from the past.
Interesting, with good performances, and some quality cinematography. But it is uneven. Early on there's a really striking image of the hanged mother in her wedding dress; later on, another wedding dress appears, but without any spooky touches - it's just there on a clothes hanger. And the folk horror details weren't delivered with enough style - think of the smile figures in the recent Smile 2 for the spookiness of good choreography. On the plus side, the visiting supervisor was just right in her buttoned down insanity - although her role trailed off into nothing. And the Father Ted style decor reeked of layered-on ignorance and obsession.
The dialogue is mostly in Irish, but lacking in lyricism - there is one powerful description by Peig of the other world, but otherwise the exchanges are quite banal, with lots of Ceart go leors ('alright') popping up. I noticed the phrase Geallaim duit ('I promise you') repeated 3 times, but the subtitles gave the final use a different translation even as the old woman marked it as the third time.
The outstanding element is the music and sound design: industrial folk doom, if that's a genre. Delivered by the mighty Die Hexen.
As a descent into madness, the story is good, but not of the first order since it shows us no way out. Not that the way out has to be taken, but its existence heightens this kind of drama. There is a little post-script after the end credits, which reinforces the theme of taking children, but too little to add extra enlightenment.
Overall: Interesting but uneven. And the title, so I'm told, is a phonetic version of the Irish for roots.
Not really a horror, but a study in generational paranoid schizophrenia - with folk horror influences: The Wickerman and Penda's Fen come through strong in the climax. The plot device is the taking of children by the Sidhe, fairy entities that appear as goats and as humans too - but which are stand-ins for altogether more material demons from the past.
Interesting, with good performances, and some quality cinematography. But it is uneven. Early on there's a really striking image of the hanged mother in her wedding dress; later on, another wedding dress appears, but without any spooky touches - it's just there on a clothes hanger. And the folk horror details weren't delivered with enough style - think of the smile figures in the recent Smile 2 for the spookiness of good choreography. On the plus side, the visiting supervisor was just right in her buttoned down insanity - although her role trailed off into nothing. And the Father Ted style decor reeked of layered-on ignorance and obsession.
The dialogue is mostly in Irish, but lacking in lyricism - there is one powerful description by Peig of the other world, but otherwise the exchanges are quite banal, with lots of Ceart go leors ('alright') popping up. I noticed the phrase Geallaim duit ('I promise you') repeated 3 times, but the subtitles gave the final use a different translation even as the old woman marked it as the third time.
The outstanding element is the music and sound design: industrial folk doom, if that's a genre. Delivered by the mighty Die Hexen.
As a descent into madness, the story is good, but not of the first order since it shows us no way out. Not that the way out has to be taken, but its existence heightens this kind of drama. There is a little post-script after the end credits, which reinforces the theme of taking children, but too little to add extra enlightenment.
Overall: Interesting but uneven. And the title, so I'm told, is a phonetic version of the Irish for roots.
Director Aislinn Clarke offers a interesting Irish horror folklore with some interesting sophisticated horror choices on the direction, writing and atmosphere throughout. Irish horror folklore isn't discussed much and it's interesting to see how filmmakers are approaching the atmosphere and tone when it comes to Irish folklore.
Placed with beautiful camerawork and sound designs, the atmosphere and setting does apply a good strong presence of the creepy vibe and feel to it. Alongside with a great musical score and a good strong lead performance from Claire Monnelly. Clarke understands the haunting and creepy environment to allow the viewers to get drawn in, and establishing what is happening to make it go under your skin.
Now I do appreciate the new concept of the horror that explores. However, I won't call it masterful since some of the writing could be improved, especially when it came to the familiar structure and character engagement as the characters didn't feel really that interesting nor connectable. And with the concept, it does feel like a concept that has been done a bit too many times.
Overall, it's a solid horror folklore tale.
Placed with beautiful camerawork and sound designs, the atmosphere and setting does apply a good strong presence of the creepy vibe and feel to it. Alongside with a great musical score and a good strong lead performance from Claire Monnelly. Clarke understands the haunting and creepy environment to allow the viewers to get drawn in, and establishing what is happening to make it go under your skin.
Now I do appreciate the new concept of the horror that explores. However, I won't call it masterful since some of the writing could be improved, especially when it came to the familiar structure and character engagement as the characters didn't feel really that interesting nor connectable. And with the concept, it does feel like a concept that has been done a bit too many times.
Overall, it's a solid horror folklore tale.
Saw a screening at the Estonian horror film festival with a couple of friends and it really exemplified how people can see films differently. Two of my companions saw it as a situation of a promising start and a let down second half, while it seemed somewhat the opposite for me.
I liked the start well enough, but for me it really got going and achieved its peaks later on. My companions didn't like the seemingly meaningless long shots in which they felt nothing happened and nothing was really explained, while for me it's something that made the movie better.
Granted, I have a thing for folk horror that is done with some respect for authenticity and reverence towards some aspects of folk beliefs and I love compelling visions of "other worlds" and dangers that are not completely explained. I loved the contemplative tempo and the feeling conjured of how it was all meaningful in a deeper sense, but not quite understandable on the intellectual level. The music, the cinematography and the editing are the true highlights, but it was a great movie for me over-all. Inspired me towards realizing some of my own ideas of supernatural "other worlds" myself in literary or some other form, but as I described with the alternative view of my companions, your mileage may vary. To me it just seems that some people want more precise narratives with more fixed meaning, while I apparently often prefer the opposite, something with as David Lynch would put it "room to dream". For me it didn't manage to go far enough on some regards to get to a 9/10, but it is a very strong 8/10 for me. Hoping to see more horror by the director. She really seems to have a knack for some aspects I value quite highly.
I liked the start well enough, but for me it really got going and achieved its peaks later on. My companions didn't like the seemingly meaningless long shots in which they felt nothing happened and nothing was really explained, while for me it's something that made the movie better.
Granted, I have a thing for folk horror that is done with some respect for authenticity and reverence towards some aspects of folk beliefs and I love compelling visions of "other worlds" and dangers that are not completely explained. I loved the contemplative tempo and the feeling conjured of how it was all meaningful in a deeper sense, but not quite understandable on the intellectual level. The music, the cinematography and the editing are the true highlights, but it was a great movie for me over-all. Inspired me towards realizing some of my own ideas of supernatural "other worlds" myself in literary or some other form, but as I described with the alternative view of my companions, your mileage may vary. To me it just seems that some people want more precise narratives with more fixed meaning, while I apparently often prefer the opposite, something with as David Lynch would put it "room to dream". For me it didn't manage to go far enough on some regards to get to a 9/10, but it is a very strong 8/10 for me. Hoping to see more horror by the director. She really seems to have a knack for some aspects I value quite highly.
Why ? Why nothing, why a thousand of clichés for nothing ?
Why everything is going slower and slower each minute of this movie ?
Why does everything important and with a little piece of action seems to all happen elsewhere ? Why bother trying to make a story when you have NO CLUE of what to do at the core of the plot ?
It's like the story tells you : put anything you want on top of that, I keep it generic and boring so anything can stick to it.
If this movie was written by Chat GPT I wouldn't be surprised.
Don't waste your time and go watch KING TIDE instead of this boring, long , cliché, border line stupid, totally lost in the story movie...
Why everything is going slower and slower each minute of this movie ?
Why does everything important and with a little piece of action seems to all happen elsewhere ? Why bother trying to make a story when you have NO CLUE of what to do at the core of the plot ?
It's like the story tells you : put anything you want on top of that, I keep it generic and boring so anything can stick to it.
If this movie was written by Chat GPT I wouldn't be surprised.
Don't waste your time and go watch KING TIDE instead of this boring, long , cliché, border line stupid, totally lost in the story movie...
I recently watched the Irish film 🇮🇪 Frewaka (2024) on Shudder. The story follows a woman trying to balance a new job as a caretaker, a budding relationship, and haunting flashbacks from a troubled past. As the visions intensify, it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish reality from memory-or perhaps imagination-as her two worlds begin to blur.
Written and directed by Aislinn Clarke (The Devil's Doorway), the film stars Clare Barrett (Sacrifice), Tara Breathnach (Dune: Part II), Grace Collender (Blackshore), and Dorothy Duffy (The Magdalene Sisters).
I had mixed feelings by the end. While the film is a slow burn, the caretaker role and domestic dynamics are well developed. The performances are authentic and emotionally resonant, effectively conveying the protagonist's mental strain. The house itself provides a mysterious, unsettling backdrop, and the cinematography enhances the psychological tension with subtle visual cues that blur the lines between reality and delusion.
That said, I found myself wanting more from the narrative. The film builds to a strong twist, but I felt it could have been pushed further to deliver a more lasting impact.
In conclusion, Frewaka has enough well-executed elements to maintain your attention, but it ultimately falls short of its full potential. I'd give it a 6/10.
Written and directed by Aislinn Clarke (The Devil's Doorway), the film stars Clare Barrett (Sacrifice), Tara Breathnach (Dune: Part II), Grace Collender (Blackshore), and Dorothy Duffy (The Magdalene Sisters).
I had mixed feelings by the end. While the film is a slow burn, the caretaker role and domestic dynamics are well developed. The performances are authentic and emotionally resonant, effectively conveying the protagonist's mental strain. The house itself provides a mysterious, unsettling backdrop, and the cinematography enhances the psychological tension with subtle visual cues that blur the lines between reality and delusion.
That said, I found myself wanting more from the narrative. The film builds to a strong twist, but I felt it could have been pushed further to deliver a more lasting impact.
In conclusion, Frewaka has enough well-executed elements to maintain your attention, but it ultimately falls short of its full potential. I'd give it a 6/10.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film title is a phonetic spelling of the Irish Language word 'fréamhach,' which means 'roots.'
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 21.893 US$
- Duración
- 1h 43min(103 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta