El Jockey

A movie good enough to be Argentine, since it's not something that uses to happen.

Luis Ortega's El Jockey is a surreal and provocative dive into identity, addiction, and self-destruction. Starring Nahuel Pérez Biscayart as Remo, a washed-up jockey spiraling into chaos, the film blends gritty realism with moments of absurdity. His toxic relationship with Abril (Úrsula Corberó) adds depth to a story that constantly defies expectations.

With striking cinematography by Timo Salminen and a bold narrative structure, El Jockey challenges conventional storytelling. Pérez Biscayart delivers a raw, intense performance, making this a gripping exploration of reinvention and self-destruction. A daring and unforgettable cinematic experience.

I didn't know what to expect from this uncharted concept, but the blackly funny poster art and USA renaming of this probable comedy (nice) sure as hell got me in the movie theater door. And El Jockey was a surreal gem of a film. I expected more sports and crime but hardly lamented their short supply, in this deadpan parable of the human brain and society. This was an absurdist Lynchian comedy, but, that is undermining its contemporary disco pulse heartbeat: it reminded me, indeed, of the most likable qualities of a gritty, noirish David Lynch flick from a bygone generation. But I thought El Jockey was ultimately funny, more conceptually singular, and less obsessed with graphic sex and violence than any of my favorite Lynch flicks. A classic.

"El Jockey" (2024), directed by Luis Ortega, is a visually striking and narratively audacious film that delves into the tumultuous life of Remo Manfredini, portrayed with remarkable depth by Nahuel Pérez Biscayart. Once a celebrated jockey, Remo's descent into self-destructive behaviors threatens not only his career but also his relationships, particularly with his partner Abril, played by Úrsula Corberó. Abril, an aspiring jockey herself, faces the dilemma of pursuing her racing ambitions or embracing impending motherhood. Their shared association with the enigmatic businessman Sirena, interpreted by Daniel Giménez Cacho, adds layers of complexity to the narrative.

Ortega's direction is both bold and unconventional, blending elements of drama, surrealism, and dark humor to craft a story that is as unpredictable as it is engaging. The film's visual aesthetic, captured through the lens of cinematographer Timo Salminen, offers a dreamlike portrayal of Buenos Aires, enhancing the narrative's exploration of identity and transformation.

The supporting cast, including Daniel Fanego, Osmar Núñez, and Roberto Carnaghi, deliver compelling performances that enrich the film's intricate tapestry. The eclectic soundtrack, featuring artists like Virus and Nino Bravo, further immerses the audience in the film's unique atmosphere.

While "El Jockey" may challenge viewers with its non-linear storytelling and abstract themes, it stands as a testament to Ortega's distinctive cinematic vision. The film invites audiences to reflect on the nature of identity, redemption, and the perpetual quest for self-discovery.

In summary, "El Jockey" is a daring and evocative piece of Argentine cinema that captivates with its originality and emotional depth. It's a journey that, while unconventional, offers a rewarding experience for those willing to embrace its artistic boldness.

Kill the Jockey (2025 USA Release) - Luis Ortega

Kill the Jockey is not what I was expecting at all from a film with that title. I went in blind, only having looked at its decent critic score on the website MetaCritic. Since I knew it was an independent foreign film, I did assume that it had the potential to be a more artful film than most movies I go to see in the theaters.

It is definitely an artful film. But is that a good thing, or a bad thing? On my first viewing of Kill the Jockey, it is tough to answer that question.

The first half of the movie is relatively normal, and funny at times, and it explains the title of the film quite easily. Meet Remo, an alcoholic and drug-addicted jockey who can only race well when he is hammered (kind of like that Family Guy episode when Peter is a genius pianist while drunk). Because Remo gets hammered or stoned so much, one time it causes him to not even start a race properly, and "bosses" get mad and try to lock him and his sort-of-girlfriend up in a small shack to force him to sober up before his next race. They need him to win, and if he does not, they threaten to kill him.

With the themes that Kill the Jockey tries to address, I will say that it is an ambitious movie which challenges its audience to determine hidden meaning. About halfway through the film, it shifts focus from a mafia group trying to control Remo to a very in-your-face transgender allegory in which Remo is reborn after an accident on the track into a feminine version of himself (and I forget her new name).

The movie started to lose me about three quarters of the way through. Characters who knew the titular jockey as Remo in the beginning suddenly start calling the now-woman by her new name as if they always knew her that way. The movie loses its cohesiveness and its logic, although maybe the hidden meaning behind the overarching plot is really there, and it is just tough for me to connect the dots? Maybe that is just surrealist cinema for you, who knows?

I am not sure whether this is just the surrealism of the second half of the movie as well, but there are several times late in the movie where it attempts to be comedic, but falls very short in most of these attempts.

The concept is good in theory, I feel. With the ambition this movie has with its transgender allegory, it seems like it falls in the same light as some of Almodovar's movies, but just not fully fleshed out or made with the same careful direction as his movies. Maybe a second viewing would allow me to see what I was missing, but I think I will pass as this movie was mostly uninteresting.

5/10.

Buy enough popcorn for the entire duration of this film - not because you'll enjoy it, but because you'll need something to distract you from the utter lack of quality. This is, by far, the worst film I have ever seen. The plot is nonsensical, the dialogue feels like it was written in one sitting by someone who had never seen a movie before, and the acting is painfully wooden. The only reason I didn't walk out was because it was pouring outside, and staying dry seemed like the better option. I was so disappointed that I created an IMDb account just to try and save someone else from wasting 1 hour and 30 minutes of their life. Do yourself a favor: avoid it at all costs!