Dos amigas, un asesinato y un café
Título original: Ice Cold: Murder, Coffee and Jessica Wongso
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,9/10
2,1 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Profundiza en los interrogantes sin respuesta que rodean el juicio de Jessica Wongso, años después de la muerte de su amiga íntima Mirna Salihin.Profundiza en los interrogantes sin respuesta que rodean el juicio de Jessica Wongso, años después de la muerte de su amiga íntima Mirna Salihin.Profundiza en los interrogantes sin respuesta que rodean el juicio de Jessica Wongso, años después de la muerte de su amiga íntima Mirna Salihin.
Erin Nicole Lundquist
- Jessica Wongso
- (English version)
- (voz)
- …
Krishna Murti
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
Beng Beng Ong
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
Mirna Salihin
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
Ferdy Sambo
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
Imam Samudra
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
O.J. Simpson
- Self
- (metraje de archivo)
Reseñas destacadas
Why wasn't Hani, who was with Mirna and Jessica, interviewed at all?
I think this is crucial to address because she was in the middle of the emergency situation.
This film feels more like a YouTube documentary than something you'd expect on Netflix.
Asking random people on the street about the case makes it seem like the production team was trying too hard to stretch the content.
Additionally, Jessica Wongso, as the accused, barely gets a chance to speak, which makes the documentary even less valuable.
The film mostly rehashes past events without providing any new or meaningful information to the audience.
This documentary showcases to a global Netflix audience that the Indonesian justice system is still chaotic-if you have money, you have power.
I think this is crucial to address because she was in the middle of the emergency situation.
This film feels more like a YouTube documentary than something you'd expect on Netflix.
Asking random people on the street about the case makes it seem like the production team was trying too hard to stretch the content.
Additionally, Jessica Wongso, as the accused, barely gets a chance to speak, which makes the documentary even less valuable.
The film mostly rehashes past events without providing any new or meaningful information to the audience.
This documentary showcases to a global Netflix audience that the Indonesian justice system is still chaotic-if you have money, you have power.
If you go by this, everyone in Indonesia is insanely vain and vapid. Their legal system is an absolute joke, with everyone involved believing and relying on science and arguments that would be laughed out of any other court in the world. The attention seeking father of the deceased woman was allowed to bring a gun into the court room, as well as place a doctored photo into evidence that was only at the last second discovered and removed. Every high school debate tournament I've seen has been head and shoulders above this country's highest court. Looks like there's a new entrant in the way too crowded race to see who can recreate the world from Idiocracy first.
"The (Indonesian) criminal justice system needs to be reformed." That was probably the truest statement made in this documentary, which could also summarize the entire movie.
Their "expert" witnesses were highly dubious to say the least. They literally brought in a physiognomist (a sort of pseudoscientist judging someone's character based on their facial features) to testify in court! I was flabbergasted! I will not reveal the verdict in my review, so as to avoid spoilers. I have my own suspicions and probably agreed with the outcome. But suffice to say the methods they used to reach that outcome were shockingly backwards and therefore I think the verdict should have been different.
Obviously there are many beautiful aspects of the diverse Indonesian culture and people, but after watching this documentary I will not be planning a trip there anytime soon. No place is perfect, certainly not my own country (United States). But this documentary revealed some serious and frightening flaws in their society. I think it's worth a look, especially if you have even a passing interest in Indonesia.
Their "expert" witnesses were highly dubious to say the least. They literally brought in a physiognomist (a sort of pseudoscientist judging someone's character based on their facial features) to testify in court! I was flabbergasted! I will not reveal the verdict in my review, so as to avoid spoilers. I have my own suspicions and probably agreed with the outcome. But suffice to say the methods they used to reach that outcome were shockingly backwards and therefore I think the verdict should have been different.
Obviously there are many beautiful aspects of the diverse Indonesian culture and people, but after watching this documentary I will not be planning a trip there anytime soon. No place is perfect, certainly not my own country (United States). But this documentary revealed some serious and frightening flaws in their society. I think it's worth a look, especially if you have even a passing interest in Indonesia.
She is absolutely a murderer. I just saw an YouTube interview with Jessica Wongso and she didn't even make any sense on anything. She was laughing and smiling in the entire interview. She never apologized for anything. She didn't even remember anything that happened that the interviewer asked.
If you thought or had an inclining that she was innocent then think again and scratch that idea because her explanation of everything was so weird and so suspicious.
She had 8 years to at least come up with an excuse, a reason, or something but her explanations were so exasperating.
She 1000% did it and then has the nerves to deny it.
The interview is in 7 News Spotlight YouTube Channel.
If you thought or had an inclining that she was innocent then think again and scratch that idea because her explanation of everything was so weird and so suspicious.
She had 8 years to at least come up with an excuse, a reason, or something but her explanations were so exasperating.
She 1000% did it and then has the nerves to deny it.
The interview is in 7 News Spotlight YouTube Channel.
Why did you call such a superficial work a documentary? No conversation was had with other friends at the same table, with other girls in the same WhatsApp group, or even with the husband of the victim. Why are random passersby talking in a documentary about a cyanide coffee case? Like "we made a bet on who would win the case and I won this car from that bet." What is that, why? You shouldn't call it a documentary if you're not going to get people involved to talk. We could get more information than that on the evening news. I was curious about the other 14 cases involving Jessica (which were, of course, also omitted from the documentary), so I googled their names. There's a 60-minute documentary that provides much more information than what's covered in this Netflix production. I mean why? Why would you do a more sloppy job when you had more budget, more reputation, and more opportunities at Netflix?
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesNetflix's first documentary film from Indonesia.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Ice Cold: Murder, Coffee and Jessica Wongso
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta