Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA missing girl, gangsters, a terrible secret, and a heavy body count. The British soap opera genre just got nasty.A missing girl, gangsters, a terrible secret, and a heavy body count. The British soap opera genre just got nasty.A missing girl, gangsters, a terrible secret, and a heavy body count. The British soap opera genre just got nasty.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Lucinda Rhodes Thakrar
- Sally
- (as Lucinda Rhodes-Flaherty)
Reseñas destacadas
I watched this the other night and really didn't care for it as I watched. But, afterwards, when I had time to think about it, I liked it better and want to watch again. The movie does a good job of presenting the problem of human trafficking without explicitly talking about it. It's a long movie. Some of the characters are rather comical. Not sure this isn't meant to be a very dark comedy. Not really much of a horror, with the exception of a few scenes. Nice twist at the end.
A terrible script which made me laugh out loud when I shouldn't!
The acting doesn't help the cause because it's also pretty weak.
At the half way point it actually does get farcical with a ridiculous scene of cartoon violence.
Daniel Peacock is the only bright spot in the cast... but even he struggles with his daft role as a private investigator.
Anyway, if you want a good laugh at other people's expense this may pass the time.
I can think of better ways to spend this budget.
The story is dark and the acting is average, the special effects are very cheap ...I should have given it 6 really as I did watch it to the end... some movies like Gravity (2013) are ranked 7-8/10 I haven't a clue why ... the plot this movie has is far better than Gravity.
Not much gore and no nudity but what a vile film.
It kept me wondering what was going to happen.
It's a sick world. I am one for the extreme side of cinema and this delivered.
Once we get past the inevitable "early-10" reviews (usually by members of the cast or maybe relatives of the caterers), and past the low-ball reviews that make a huge fuss about the budget (most indies have a low budget, which is why they are indies), we finally get a chance to look at the actual film. The first thing you notice is the runtime. Hawken did not set out to do a simple "filler" for cable because his final cut is well over 2 hours. This was a serious effort at a "genre-busting" riff on the now-popular "lost teen" niche. Except that, rather being a straightforward procedural, it breaks more of the genre's conventions than it follows. It is this aspect alone -- that the viewer cam never quite see around the next corner -- that makes NO REASONS more interesting than it would otherwise be. As for all the comments on the horror of the underlying story, wake up and smell the Evil. Anyone in law enforcement will tell you this film actually UNDERSTATES the reality.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 10.000 GBP (estimación)
- Duración
- 2h 11min(131 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta