El muro negro

Brick is not an Oscar contender. Brick does not have the best screenplay ever written. Brick is not deep. Brick incorporates some cliches, and it will not likely show up on many Top 10 lists.

Brick IS a generally fun romp through a "what-if" world where seven people share an unexpected prison, where two love each other madly, and two find that the prison might hold the key to rediscovering why they used to love each other before.

Again, it's not deep. It is a great way to pass 99 minutes, and Matthias Schweighöfer and Ruby O. Fee are once again a pleasure to watch.

Does every movie have to change your life? Enjoy.

I liked it. The premise is original, and if you can overlook the several gaps in the logic of the story, you'll have a pretty fine scifi thriller. There's a good pace, with some nice jump scares and some modest violence. The various residents are sufficiently different, with each their own background, so that you can care for them. The way the main characters gradually found out how to operate the walls was cleverly done, and together with a few plot twists, it kept me entertained till the end. Maybe that ending wasn't too convincing, but the CGI of it was visually pretty impressive. The acting was overall good, I especially liked Matthias Schweighöfer, with his sturdy kind of charm.

The premise had promise. The idea if being trapped inside a building by a wall that covered the building in an instant, trying to figure out how it got there, what it is, and how to get out, was intriguing. Unfortunately the dialogue was weak and in many cases unbelievable. In some cases I expected a person to react in one way, maybe with astonishment, but instead the reaction was hum drum as if this was an every day occurrence. In other circumstances certain people were full of bravado and a take charge attitude, but when they really needed to come through they did nothing. A 180 turn from their character. The movie is not bad enough to enjoy as a really bad movie, and it's not good enough to take it seriously or recommend it to a friend, unless they have nothing else to watch. It does have a few redeeming qualities. When you don't lose focus in the parts with bad dialogue, it's intriguing enough to watch till the end.

I like science fiction movies, so when I saw Netflix was releasing Brick, a film where people get mysteriously trapped in their apartments, I was immediately intrigued. Add Matthias Schweighöfer to the mix and I was in. (Fun fact: I didn't know he was German, but the last name should've tipped me off.)

The premise is cool: Tim (Schweighöfer) and his girlfriend Olivia (played by Ruby O. Fee) suddenly find themselves sealed inside their home by strange walls. They can't get out, but they can break through floors and walls into neighboring apartments. That's how they meet others in the same situation and form a group determined to escape.

The concept is strong, and I'll admit: I wanted to know what would happen next. There's suspense, tension, and a mysterious "end-of-the-world" atmosphere that kept me engaged. But... it's far from perfect.

Each character is given a brief backstory, but then when they die, it often feels pointless. Their background doesn't really feed into the story, and I was left wondering why the film spent time introducing it in the first place.

And while some moments are truly tense, others are unintentionally funny or just poorly written. A woman stuck halfway inside a wall? It's supposed to be horrific, but comes off as bizarre slapstick. A supposed villain taped to a chair escapes like it's a magic trick, which breaks the tension instead of building it.

There are also logic issues. One guy, who lost his hands, somehow figured out how to open part of the wall using advanced tech he shouldn't have access to. It's never explained. Plot holes like these hurt the believability, and that's especially annoying in a film that wants to be taken seriously.

Working in building maintenance myself, I also couldn't help but notice: the way the apartments are structured (with everyone able to break through floors so conveniently) is completely unrealistic. It took me out of the experience more than once.

That said, the ending was strong. Dark, grim, and oddly satisfying. It fit the tone of the story and didn't try to sugarcoat anything. I respect that.

So why a 6/10? Because despite the flaws, Brick does keep you watching. It's an original idea with a solid atmosphere and decent performances. But with lazy writing in key moments and too many logical gaps, it falls short of being the smart, grounded sci-fi it wants to be.

Brick is the ultimate grandmother of all bad movies ever made. So bad you can hardly believe it. Incredibly lame with a stupid story that leads nowhere. Who writes this stuff? Who at Netflix thinks, "hey this sound really cool. How much money do you need? I mean, we are Netflix, we swim in money." The entire 2nd act, (if one can call it that) is so painfully boring. Every character is undeveloped, has no goal and is totally unappealing. What a waist of time. The director (also the author) behind this drama has no idea how to build suspense. Do you see any fear, sweat, tears or anger in the characters? No. The whole thing was probably shot on some soundstage in Eastern Europe (because it was cheap). Just an embarrassing movie.