Face to Face with Scott Peterson

There have been multiple documentaries about this case, and this one doesn't tell us anything new just because Scott speaks. I don't see a man broken because he was falsely convicted, I see someone who thinks that he's served enough time and wants another chance at life.

He offers no explanation of why he drove 90 miles to go fishing on a day that was too cold and wet to play golf.

He demonstrates no discernible distress at the loss of Laci, or that of his child.

He still comes across as disingenuous and self-focused. He doesn't seem concerned with finding the 'real' killer/s, just in convincing the audience that he had nothing to do with the deaths.

He calls Amber a liar, and claims that he made no promises about their relationship and future despite recordings implying a commitment.

The dedication of his sister-in-law beggars belief. She supports his innocence with a conviction that is bordering on unsettling.

I still feel that Scott Peterson is where he belongs and that he should die in jail.

Where are the probing questions for Scott? The documentary doesn't ask Scott any questions that really matter or do much to prove that he is innocent. So he says he is an a-hole big deal we know that! Why would you leave your wife on Christmas Eve and pregnant no less to go fishing? Why would you lie from beginning to end and tell people you told your wife about the affair and she was ok about it! Really? There are very things that are very similar with Laci Patterson documentary but this one is clearly slanted towards Scott and not very impartial. Scott came off just as unbelievable then and as he does now.

Waste of time, they obviously made this documentary on the heels of Lacy's documentary on Netflix. Scott is seen smiling throughout the series smiling and very nonchalant which rubbed me the wrong way. Also, when asked who killed Lacy, he blames the two men for that one burglary that happened across the street, how convenient to blame others when reasonable doubt clearly points at Scott Peterson. Then they have a so-called journalist who thinks he's a detective and says that Scott didn't have a motive ... um hello, they forget about Amber Frei?! This so-called documentary was biased toward Scott. Then they try and say that Lacy was abducted in a van that was found burned, even though there was zero evidence of Lacy's DNA. The reach is real with one. I wish I could take back the hours I spent watching this mess. Lastly, may Scott continue to rot in prison. R.i.p Lacy and Connor.

AVOID AT ALL COST!

What a waste of my time, couldn't continue after miserables 43 min.

Dude is a pathological liar that had a girlfriend while married, never showed any emotions , not even after 20 years later.

He absolutely dumped Laci's body with his unborn child into the sea.

I dont know what is going on exactly with these recent documentaries trying to show a different "perspective" about literally and convicted murders.

Save yourself there is nothing new here and I have no idea of why his cuckoo sister in law is trying to help this maniac.

This is a completely disservice to Laci and her family, there is literally a ton of evidence against Scott but people still have the nerve.

Not very compelling. Scott Peterson still should not speak in his own defense. He comes off as not genuine and dismissive. Honestly all of the circumstantial evidence presented in the trial and other documentaries is very convincing. The people in this documentary also provide holes and other possible circumstantial evidence that would support Scott's innocence but it is not very strong. The timing of Scott telling (lying) Amber Frey that his wife was dead, his purchase of a boat (that no one knew of), his examination of tide tables, where he said he went "fishing" and where the bodies were found is beyond coincidental. His behavior particularly his continued communication with Amber Frey while the search was still going for his wife is suspicious.