PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,6/10
4,5 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Dos románticos agotadores se encuentran en una boda y casi se enganchan en el guardarropa antes de frenar. Aceptan intercambiar confesiones sinceras sobre su pasado ante la remota posibilida... Leer todoDos románticos agotadores se encuentran en una boda y casi se enganchan en el guardarropa antes de frenar. Aceptan intercambiar confesiones sinceras sobre su pasado ante la remota posibilidad de que esto sea real.Dos románticos agotadores se encuentran en una boda y casi se enganchan en el guardarropa antes de frenar. Aceptan intercambiar confesiones sinceras sobre su pasado ante la remota posibilidad de que esto sea real.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Kenzie Grey
- Juliet
- (voz)
Reseñas destacadas
Jane (Lucy Hale) and Will (Nat Wolff) are strangers and guests at a wedding. She almost has drunken sex with him before he stops her. They start to talk about their past relationships.
My initial superficial take is that Will needs to be hunkier. It would help especially since his character pulls so many beautiful women. After that initial thought, my next hot take is that this is trying to be Before Sunrise. Again, this would benefit from an Ethan Hawke like actor. The main difference is the many flashbacks. I both like them and have issues with them. I would like Will to have fewer women and concentrate on setting up the final reveal. Juliet should be his first 'girlfriend' story and then the last flashback should be a repeat of the same story with the truth revealed. At the end of the day, I really like the attempt even if it's not completely successful.
My initial superficial take is that Will needs to be hunkier. It would help especially since his character pulls so many beautiful women. After that initial thought, my next hot take is that this is trying to be Before Sunrise. Again, this would benefit from an Ethan Hawke like actor. The main difference is the many flashbacks. I both like them and have issues with them. I would like Will to have fewer women and concentrate on setting up the final reveal. Juliet should be his first 'girlfriend' story and then the last flashback should be a repeat of the same story with the truth revealed. At the end of the day, I really like the attempt even if it's not completely successful.
The bones are there, ready to be reaped of a ghost, yet the spectre is hazy.
I liked the plot. The chemistry was a little lacking, though the more poignant moments showed an abundance-so much so that I suspect some of the writing played a significant role in dampening the spark between the characters.
The characters as individuals and the way they related to each others shortcomings highlighted the best part of the movie. We all suffer the fear of rejection, of being unable and afraid of sharing our most horrendous selves, but the way they connected and sympathised inspires hope.
Ultimately, as a movie, a form of entertainment, it was, unfortunately, subpar. Still, I think it worth viewing.
I liked the plot. The chemistry was a little lacking, though the more poignant moments showed an abundance-so much so that I suspect some of the writing played a significant role in dampening the spark between the characters.
The characters as individuals and the way they related to each others shortcomings highlighted the best part of the movie. We all suffer the fear of rejection, of being unable and afraid of sharing our most horrendous selves, but the way they connected and sympathised inspires hope.
Ultimately, as a movie, a form of entertainment, it was, unfortunately, subpar. Still, I think it worth viewing.
In director Peter Hutchings' pretentious romance flick "Which Brings Me To You" Nat Wolff (terrific actor - wasted here) & Lucy Hale (meh) meet at a wedding where he defers having sex til after they've shared long, competitive accounts of their love-lives (only Keith Bunin knows why (or Steve Almond & Julianna Baggott on whose novel he based this screenplay on)). It gets tedious fast, and ends up dragging excrutiatingly - mainly due to the dislikeableness of the characters, particularly Hale's. Any appeal it could have would rely on maintaining interest in the two leads... who except to themselves (and apparently each other) are not interesting at all. A turd. Flush it away.
I kept reading how this was a romcom, but it's definitely missing the comedy part.
Lucy Hale is great, Nat Wolff was ok, the soundtrack was horrible. I think the movie would have so much more potential but the soundtrack was one of the things that kind of killed it and made it quite boring.
It's always this mellow music with no exciting parts.
In my opinion the movie consisted of way too many slow scenes and too little funny scenes to lift the mood. I also don't get how they cast all these beautiful women as his ex-partners and these, well, not as attractive men for her. She had zero chemistry with any of them.
The chemistry between the main characters was also not the greatest. I was so looking forward to this movie but am pretty disappointed.
Lucy Hale is great, Nat Wolff was ok, the soundtrack was horrible. I think the movie would have so much more potential but the soundtrack was one of the things that kind of killed it and made it quite boring.
It's always this mellow music with no exciting parts.
In my opinion the movie consisted of way too many slow scenes and too little funny scenes to lift the mood. I also don't get how they cast all these beautiful women as his ex-partners and these, well, not as attractive men for her. She had zero chemistry with any of them.
The chemistry between the main characters was also not the greatest. I was so looking forward to this movie but am pretty disappointed.
So this is a movie about a couple of walking red flags doing a whole bunch of red flagging and eventually winning a happy ending.
I hate it.
The supermarket musical score is as terrible as it is entirely fitting.
It wants to be a movie about redemption and learning from mistakes with a heartwarming there's-someone-for-everyone outcome but it isn't. What it is instead is an exercise in excusing terrible behaviour, a commitment deficit, emotional gaslighting and a complete lack of personal accountability.
None of the characters are likeable and are portrayed with a by-the-numbers cast. Overall I just hated that these people got a chance of happiness after being such terrible people for all of their adult lives.
I hate it.
The supermarket musical score is as terrible as it is entirely fitting.
It wants to be a movie about redemption and learning from mistakes with a heartwarming there's-someone-for-everyone outcome but it isn't. What it is instead is an exercise in excusing terrible behaviour, a commitment deficit, emotional gaslighting and a complete lack of personal accountability.
None of the characters are likeable and are portrayed with a by-the-numbers cast. Overall I just hated that these people got a chance of happiness after being such terrible people for all of their adult lives.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesJane says the wedding is in the Hamptons, but several prominent signs (Keansburg Amusement Park, The Saint Asbury Park) shows that they're in New Jersey
- PifiasJane says her high school boyfriend drives a Red 1968 Mustang. The Red Mustang in the film is a Red 1966 Mustang model.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Which Brings Me to You?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Which Brings Me to You
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración
- 1h 38min(98 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta