Katrina: Contra viento y marea
Título original: Katrina: Come Hell and High Water
La revisión del huracán que causó 1,392 muertes y más de 100 mil millones de dólares en daños en 2005.La revisión del huracán que causó 1,392 muertes y más de 100 mil millones de dólares en daños en 2005.La revisión del huracán que causó 1,392 muertes y más de 100 mil millones de dólares en daños en 2005.
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
This three-part documentary goes beyond the story of Hurricane Katrina itself, examining how systemic racism shaped both the scale of the tragedy and its aftermath for New Orleans' predominantly Black population.
Episodes 1 and 2 cover the period immediately before, during, and after the storm. Government failure is a recurring theme: officials delayed evacuation orders until the last moment, leaving tens of thousands behind as Katrina made landfall. The initial relief that the city had survived the storm quickly gave way to horror when the levees collapsed, flooding entire neighbourhoods. With residents stranded, drowning, and dying, state and federal authorities were slow to launch meaningful rescue efforts. Much like National Geographic's Katrina: Race Against Time, these episodes highlight how systemic racism underpinned every failure - from inadequate evacuation plans, to neglected infrastructure, to the lethargic post-flood response.
Episode 3, however, feels like a different film altogether, more of Spike Lee's love letter to New Orleans and its people. It traces the 20 years since the disaster, showing how survivors continue to face the long shadow of racism. Many have been priced out of their own city through gentrification; others endure poorly built homes in developments pushed by "well-meaning" progressives and celebrities. Black culture, once the heartbeat of New Orleans, is steadily eroded and displaced. This final episode is provocative, perhaps deliberately so. If it makes viewers uncomfortable, it's worth asking: why does confronting the realities of Black suffering in America provoke such resistance? Perhaps this is why the episode wasn't released as a stand-alone piece - it challenges too directly, and some audiences would simply turn away.
Episodes 1 and 2 cover the period immediately before, during, and after the storm. Government failure is a recurring theme: officials delayed evacuation orders until the last moment, leaving tens of thousands behind as Katrina made landfall. The initial relief that the city had survived the storm quickly gave way to horror when the levees collapsed, flooding entire neighbourhoods. With residents stranded, drowning, and dying, state and federal authorities were slow to launch meaningful rescue efforts. Much like National Geographic's Katrina: Race Against Time, these episodes highlight how systemic racism underpinned every failure - from inadequate evacuation plans, to neglected infrastructure, to the lethargic post-flood response.
Episode 3, however, feels like a different film altogether, more of Spike Lee's love letter to New Orleans and its people. It traces the 20 years since the disaster, showing how survivors continue to face the long shadow of racism. Many have been priced out of their own city through gentrification; others endure poorly built homes in developments pushed by "well-meaning" progressives and celebrities. Black culture, once the heartbeat of New Orleans, is steadily eroded and displaced. This final episode is provocative, perhaps deliberately so. If it makes viewers uncomfortable, it's worth asking: why does confronting the realities of Black suffering in America provoke such resistance? Perhaps this is why the episode wasn't released as a stand-alone piece - it challenges too directly, and some audiences would simply turn away.
While good and informative for E1 & 2, E3 dragged. I learned more from watching the National Geographic doc, "Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time." Some crossover with interviews of same people. Still, being a fan of NOLA and visited many times, I learned a lot. I found it especially interesting about the "recovery" of the area. And Commander Honore' is my new favorite person. He was a bad@$$.
1 & 2 are very effective documentaries - presenting facts and telling stories of real people and their struggles during a natural tragedy. Spike Lee completely destroys this by turning to opinion, discussion and theory.
Why would he not look at the work of the other creators and produce something that is coherent with the rest of the series??
He is clearly a narcissist - I say this as the other documentaries leave it to the people who suffered this tragedy to recount their journeys of survival. This final documentary ha Spike regularly interjecting, trying to show that he is 'part of it' or some such. The guy is insufferable and I hope that he is never allowed near important and factual film making ever again.
Why would he not look at the work of the other creators and produce something that is coherent with the rest of the series??
He is clearly a narcissist - I say this as the other documentaries leave it to the people who suffered this tragedy to recount their journeys of survival. This final documentary ha Spike regularly interjecting, trying to show that he is 'part of it' or some such. The guy is insufferable and I hope that he is never allowed near important and factual film making ever again.
This is a mostly well-made and well-paced documentary that powerfully details the devastating and moving stories of what happened during Hurricane Katrina.
The first two episodes are excellent, but the third feels like a letdown-shifting focus to hype a climate agenda and overshadowing the other important points that key voices are trying to make.
And Brad Pitt... fix the shoddy homes you built for people.
The first two episodes are excellent, but the third feels like a letdown-shifting focus to hype a climate agenda and overshadowing the other important points that key voices are trying to make.
And Brad Pitt... fix the shoddy homes you built for people.
I think this series is worth watching but as a whole it comes off very disjointed. The first two episodes feel like they came from a different series altogether from the third.
The first two episodes are telling the historical story of hurricane Katrina and the failures afterwards. The points made by the third episode revolve around the systemic cultural failures that occurred during the rebuilding process are very valid. But it comes off as almost a PowerPoint presentation in parts. The editing style and approach are very different from the other two episodes. It comes across as a series a jumbled narrative of interviews that kind of tell a story, but one that could have been handled better stylistically. Also felt like the dead of Katrina get left behind in the series. The identification and stories of them get ignored for the most part.
The first two episodes are telling the historical story of hurricane Katrina and the failures afterwards. The points made by the third episode revolve around the systemic cultural failures that occurred during the rebuilding process are very valid. But it comes off as almost a PowerPoint presentation in parts. The editing style and approach are very different from the other two episodes. It comes across as a series a jumbled narrative of interviews that kind of tell a story, but one that could have been handled better stylistically. Also felt like the dead of Katrina get left behind in the series. The identification and stories of them get ignored for the most part.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Katrina: Come Hell and High Water
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración
- 1h(60 min)
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta