Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesExplorar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y ticketsNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la TV y en streamingLas 250 mejores seriesProgramas de televisión más popularesExplorar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    ¿Qué verÚltimos tráileresOriginales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPremios STARmeterCentral de premiosCentral de festivalesTodos los eventos
    Personas nacidas hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias de famosos
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de seguimiento
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar la aplicación

zngkjsdpv

Se unió el oct 2021
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.

Distintivos2

Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Comentarios2

Calificación de zngkjsdpv
Twisters

Twisters

6,5
5
  • 18 jul 2024
  • Very average

    This movie takes place after the events of the first one where two groups of storm-chasers compete with each other to get to the tornadoes first. One group are scientific researchers trying understand tornadoes better. The other group are "tornado wranglers" and I still don't really know what they do.

    I won't give any more details so I don't spoil it but I will offer some of my thoughts on the film.

    The good:
    • the special effects were great. I loved the visuals and I found the storms to look quite realistic.


    • the overall story was enjoyable as well. The general concept made sense. I liked the idea of researching weather and trying to find a way to minimise its impact on the community. It could have used some refining, but overall it worked.


    The bad:
    • the script was dreadful. The characters said things that people don't say in reality. This movie had every cliche in the book and was very predictable


    • it felt like a 2 hour advertisement for Ram Trucks. There seemed to be more focus on the cars than the tornadoes.


    • I think the actors were the wrong choice. They were too young to have the expertise they did and they didn't have a lot of chemistry between them. The main actress gave a very wooden performance in my opinion.


    • I really had to suspend my disbelief in order to enjoy this film. The filmmakers completely disregarded physics and how tornadoes actually work in order to tell the story they wanted to. A good example of it is how the tornadoes would destroy things miles away but wouldn't affect anything a few yards from it.


    Overall, this movie left much to be desired. I didn't expect a masterpiece but I was left feeling a bit disappointed by the results.
    Ashley Madison: Sexo, mentiras y escándalos

    Ashley Madison: Sexo, mentiras y escándalos

    6,2
    5
  • 18 may 2024
  • Did not need three episodes

    It was an interesting premise. I enjoyed hearing the story of how Ashley Madison began and how they marketed the website. However, they took an idea that had enough content for a 1-1.5 hour tv special and turned it into three separate hour long episodes. It was very bloated and repetitive in a lot of places. The personal stories of the interviewees were also drawn out. The show did have some interesting facts and perspectives within it and it was well put together. However, I found myself skipping a number of interviews and scenes because of how repetitive it was. You're probably better just googling the story rather than watching this show.

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Inicia sesión para tener más accesoInicia sesión para tener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Anuncios
    • Empleos
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una empresa de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.