Cornish_pirate
Se unió el nov 2019
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Comentarios15
Calificación de Cornish_pirate
I did enjoy this, but not as much as I expected from the other reviews.
It just feels that based on: Stephen Graham Ashley Walters Young lead Single shot episodes Shocking storyline We are MEANT to be impressed and it's popular to like these things. It doesn't automatically make it great entertainment though.
It was okay, but certainly not a 10/10. The acting was great in places, but wooden in others. The scenes were gripping at times, but soon because drawn out. The storyline was important and upsetting, but often unbelievable. The directing was clever, but unnecessary for the majority.
It felt like an experiment by the director and a bit amateur at times. It's worth a watch, make your own mind up.
It just feels that based on: Stephen Graham Ashley Walters Young lead Single shot episodes Shocking storyline We are MEANT to be impressed and it's popular to like these things. It doesn't automatically make it great entertainment though.
It was okay, but certainly not a 10/10. The acting was great in places, but wooden in others. The scenes were gripping at times, but soon because drawn out. The storyline was important and upsetting, but often unbelievable. The directing was clever, but unnecessary for the majority.
It felt like an experiment by the director and a bit amateur at times. It's worth a watch, make your own mind up.
Does every film need to be a masterpiece these days, or can't a movie simply entertain!
Is it ridiculous? Absolutely.
Style over substance? Without a doubt.
Predictable? Sure.
Unbelievable? 100%.
But is it entertaining? Without question!
If you're after an Oscar-worthy drama filled with intricate twists, profound writing, and thought-provoking themes that demand hours of analysis-this isn't the film for you.
However, if you're in the mood for pure entertainment - a wild blend of romance, thriller, horror, sci-fi, and action, then grab your popcorn, suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the ride.
I had a blast watching it for what it is: fun, not fine art.
Is it ridiculous? Absolutely.
Style over substance? Without a doubt.
Predictable? Sure.
Unbelievable? 100%.
But is it entertaining? Without question!
If you're after an Oscar-worthy drama filled with intricate twists, profound writing, and thought-provoking themes that demand hours of analysis-this isn't the film for you.
However, if you're in the mood for pure entertainment - a wild blend of romance, thriller, horror, sci-fi, and action, then grab your popcorn, suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the ride.
I had a blast watching it for what it is: fun, not fine art.
At the time of writing, Heretic holds a commendable 7/10 rating, and that assessment feels entirely justified. It's a film of two distinct halves-an exhilarating, masterfully crafted opening that sets a high bar, followed by a second act that, while still engaging, struggles to sustain the brilliance of its predecessor.
Much has been said about the latter half losing its way, and while there's some truth to that sentiment, I wouldn't go so far as to call it aimless. Instead, it feels like a missed opportunity-a divergence into a direction that, while competent, lacked the potential for greatness teased earlier in the narrative.
The film's shortcomings lie largely in the squandered promise of its second half, which accounts for its lost three stars. However, this doesn't diminish the overall experience. Hugh Grant, in particular, is a revelation in this role, delivering a magnetic and unsettling performance that cements him as a natural fit for more sinister, horror-centric characters. His portrayal, coupled with stellar performances across the board, ensures Heretic remains thoroughly enjoyable.
Don't be discouraged by criticisms of the second half; while it doesn't quite measure up to the electric first half, it's far from "awful." Instead, it's a film that delivers enough intrigue, strong performances, and a memorable turn by Hugh Grant to make it well worth your time.
Heretic may not reach its full potential, but it remains a solidly entertaining horror experience, and Grant's performance alone is reason enough to watch.
Much has been said about the latter half losing its way, and while there's some truth to that sentiment, I wouldn't go so far as to call it aimless. Instead, it feels like a missed opportunity-a divergence into a direction that, while competent, lacked the potential for greatness teased earlier in the narrative.
The film's shortcomings lie largely in the squandered promise of its second half, which accounts for its lost three stars. However, this doesn't diminish the overall experience. Hugh Grant, in particular, is a revelation in this role, delivering a magnetic and unsettling performance that cements him as a natural fit for more sinister, horror-centric characters. His portrayal, coupled with stellar performances across the board, ensures Heretic remains thoroughly enjoyable.
Don't be discouraged by criticisms of the second half; while it doesn't quite measure up to the electric first half, it's far from "awful." Instead, it's a film that delivers enough intrigue, strong performances, and a memorable turn by Hugh Grant to make it well worth your time.
Heretic may not reach its full potential, but it remains a solidly entertaining horror experience, and Grant's performance alone is reason enough to watch.