cnppuig
Se unió el jun 2021
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Comentarios2
Calificación de cnppuig
This was awful on an "Ancient Aliens" level ... lots of strawman arguments, lots of weak connections, lots of things that make no sense. The filmmakers say that Kubrick made the Shining his own (upsetting Stephen King) ... that's TRUE and documented. But then the narrator makes a huge deal about how Kubrick named the hotel The Overlook, which is a veiled reference to a military base of a similar name. The film lost all credibility at this point ... Kubrick didn't name the hotel, King did.
They also make a big deal about "our people in Denver" secretly meaning the CIA. I think it would be more reasonable that there would be a first round screening interview (by phone?) before asking an applicant to drive 6 hours round trip.
The filmmakers interview a retired FBI officer... in the background, right by his head, is a door with the knob broken off. Low budget? Lack of attention to detail? A secret message that this film is busted and impossible to get a handle on?
This was ridiculous and uninteresting from start to finish. I forced myself to watch it all because I paid $2.99 to watch it.
On a positive note, It did make me want to reread Catcher in the Rye. TBH I never noticed that was the book Wendy was reading at the beginning.
They also make a big deal about "our people in Denver" secretly meaning the CIA. I think it would be more reasonable that there would be a first round screening interview (by phone?) before asking an applicant to drive 6 hours round trip.
The filmmakers interview a retired FBI officer... in the background, right by his head, is a door with the knob broken off. Low budget? Lack of attention to detail? A secret message that this film is busted and impossible to get a handle on?
This was ridiculous and uninteresting from start to finish. I forced myself to watch it all because I paid $2.99 to watch it.
On a positive note, It did make me want to reread Catcher in the Rye. TBH I never noticed that was the book Wendy was reading at the beginning.
I noticed this AFTER watching it. The irony is so thick... they couldn't find a female director?!