TheGuyWhoLikesMovies
Se unió el ago 2021
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Comentarios42
Calificación de TheGuyWhoLikesMovies
F1 is a thrilling ride that throws you straight into the driver's seat of a Formula car. The cinematography is by far the movie's strongest element - dynamic, stylish, and genuinely immersive. It's refreshing to see a racing film shot in such an exhilarating way, all while staying grounded in realism and successfully conveying the emotions, themes, and chemistry you'd expect from this world.
Brad Pitt, Javier Bardem, and Damson Idris all deliver solid performances that fit the tone of the film well.
Unfortunately, the story and characters are painfully generic. I expected the relationship between the veteran and the rookie to have much more depth, but it's handled in a very barebones, superficial way. The plot as a whole is forgettable, even uninspiring at times, and most character motivations - aside from Sonny (Brad Pitt) - are either unclear or simply vanish in the rush of high-speed driving.
I found myself wishing for more meaningful character development and stronger writing, rather than the film putting unnecessary focus on "representation" at the expense of natural, organic growth for its characters.
Still, despite its shortcomings, F1 is fun and delivers on the excitement it promises. For me, it earns a respectful 6.8/10.
Brad Pitt, Javier Bardem, and Damson Idris all deliver solid performances that fit the tone of the film well.
Unfortunately, the story and characters are painfully generic. I expected the relationship between the veteran and the rookie to have much more depth, but it's handled in a very barebones, superficial way. The plot as a whole is forgettable, even uninspiring at times, and most character motivations - aside from Sonny (Brad Pitt) - are either unclear or simply vanish in the rush of high-speed driving.
I found myself wishing for more meaningful character development and stronger writing, rather than the film putting unnecessary focus on "representation" at the expense of natural, organic growth for its characters.
Still, despite its shortcomings, F1 is fun and delivers on the excitement it promises. For me, it earns a respectful 6.8/10.
What is war? What does it mean to be a good soldier?
This film strikes a remarkable balance between conveying a deeper message and delivering a raw, brutal war story. As a German production, it stands apart from the typical Hollywood war film-you can truly feel the difference. It's unflinching, gritty, and some of the visual effects and sequences are absolutely top-tier.
The performances across the board are outstanding. The lead character, Paul (played by Felix Kammerer), is exceptionally well-developed. Without relying heavily on dialogue, he powerfully conveys the emotional weight of experiencing what can only be described as hell on earth.
That said, I believe some of the character relationships could have been explored with more depth. Readers familiar with the book the film is based on will likely notice this as well. However, this didn't detract from the film's overall impact for me.
The movie also does an excellent job of portraying war propaganda and manipulation-without ever clearly taking sides. It tells an objective, sobering story about morality, humanity, and the psychological toll of war. By the time the credits roll, you may find yourself reflecting deeply on the question: What truly makes someone a good soldier?
While certain parts of the film drag slightly and could have benefited from tighter pacing, it remains an unforgettable experience. I would confidently call it a must-watch-not just for today, but for years to come. Especially in our current world, the themes and messages in this film feel more relevant than ever. They deserve to be heard before others shape our views for us.
Rating: 8/10.
This film strikes a remarkable balance between conveying a deeper message and delivering a raw, brutal war story. As a German production, it stands apart from the typical Hollywood war film-you can truly feel the difference. It's unflinching, gritty, and some of the visual effects and sequences are absolutely top-tier.
The performances across the board are outstanding. The lead character, Paul (played by Felix Kammerer), is exceptionally well-developed. Without relying heavily on dialogue, he powerfully conveys the emotional weight of experiencing what can only be described as hell on earth.
That said, I believe some of the character relationships could have been explored with more depth. Readers familiar with the book the film is based on will likely notice this as well. However, this didn't detract from the film's overall impact for me.
The movie also does an excellent job of portraying war propaganda and manipulation-without ever clearly taking sides. It tells an objective, sobering story about morality, humanity, and the psychological toll of war. By the time the credits roll, you may find yourself reflecting deeply on the question: What truly makes someone a good soldier?
While certain parts of the film drag slightly and could have benefited from tighter pacing, it remains an unforgettable experience. I would confidently call it a must-watch-not just for today, but for years to come. Especially in our current world, the themes and messages in this film feel more relevant than ever. They deserve to be heard before others shape our views for us.
Rating: 8/10.
You can't really form clear thoughts about the newest Superman movie without first watching the original Superman-so that's exactly what I did, and here are my thoughts.
Right from the beginning, you notice that the movie takes itself seriously, even for a superhero film. The acting is superb, and the characters are well portrayed.
What I liked most about this movie is that it's heavily focused on Clark Kent. It's his movie, his perspective, and his journey of assuming the role of a savior. There are enough character moments to really make you feel connected to everyone-especially the relationship between Clark and Lois.
The score in this movie is also memorable and will stay in your head forever.
However, certain things are a bit challenging to watch, considering it's a superhero movie filmed in the late '70s. The early effects, flying, and action scenes are outdated-but still entertaining. And considering the time when the film was made, I'd even be bold enough to say they're still impressive for that era.
By now, we're used to fast-paced, action-packed superhero movies, which is why this one feels completely different. It's rather slow and much more character-focused-and luckily, it shines in that aspect. I'd also say that Lex Luthor was decently portrayed; he didn't feel over-exaggerated or too comical for a villain.
Now, on to our Superman. Christopher Reeve was perfection. He'll be remembered as the greatest interpretation of Superman for a long time. I'm sure capable actors will come, but his look, charisma, and the confidence he wears the second he steps into the suit are hard to match.
Overall, it was a great movie that still holds its ground in the superhero genre. The slow pacing, lack of action, and the contrast with today's modern superhero tempo might be this film's kryptonite-but it wins the battle by being entertaining enough to watch even 47 years later.
I would still advise fans of Superman to watch this movie as a nice "prequel" to the newest DC Universe that James Gunn is bringing us.
Right from the beginning, you notice that the movie takes itself seriously, even for a superhero film. The acting is superb, and the characters are well portrayed.
What I liked most about this movie is that it's heavily focused on Clark Kent. It's his movie, his perspective, and his journey of assuming the role of a savior. There are enough character moments to really make you feel connected to everyone-especially the relationship between Clark and Lois.
The score in this movie is also memorable and will stay in your head forever.
However, certain things are a bit challenging to watch, considering it's a superhero movie filmed in the late '70s. The early effects, flying, and action scenes are outdated-but still entertaining. And considering the time when the film was made, I'd even be bold enough to say they're still impressive for that era.
By now, we're used to fast-paced, action-packed superhero movies, which is why this one feels completely different. It's rather slow and much more character-focused-and luckily, it shines in that aspect. I'd also say that Lex Luthor was decently portrayed; he didn't feel over-exaggerated or too comical for a villain.
Now, on to our Superman. Christopher Reeve was perfection. He'll be remembered as the greatest interpretation of Superman for a long time. I'm sure capable actors will come, but his look, charisma, and the confidence he wears the second he steps into the suit are hard to match.
Overall, it was a great movie that still holds its ground in the superhero genre. The slow pacing, lack of action, and the contrast with today's modern superhero tempo might be this film's kryptonite-but it wins the battle by being entertaining enough to watch even 47 years later.
I would still advise fans of Superman to watch this movie as a nice "prequel" to the newest DC Universe that James Gunn is bringing us.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
12encuestas realizadas en total
