amits-998
Se unió el jul 2025
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Calificaciones3
Calificación de amits-998
Comentarios2
Calificación de amits-998
One of the most well researched documentaries on this controversial double murder case.
The team has gone to great length to cover all aspects of the case including reaching out to present location of key figures in the case, getting experts to analyze footage, body languages, etc. Once you go over it, you understand why the botched investigation and personal bias by the investigating teams (and fuelled by media wars), resulted in a case which might bever actually be solved, even if we may find a culprit(s), we may never be able to convict him(them).
A great job and how I wish our investigators had put in as much effort.
The team has gone to great length to cover all aspects of the case including reaching out to present location of key figures in the case, getting experts to analyze footage, body languages, etc. Once you go over it, you understand why the botched investigation and personal bias by the investigating teams (and fuelled by media wars), resulted in a case which might bever actually be solved, even if we may find a culprit(s), we may never be able to convict him(them).
A great job and how I wish our investigators had put in as much effort.
The documentary falls way below expectations due tobseceral factors.
Like the police investigation and the 2 cbi teams, this documentary falters, not because it does not present facts, but because it selectively presents facts which suit the narrative which indicates a clear bias.
Without divulging the details, I would mention that the director has decided on his version of truth, which might be prejudiced by his assistants, because of his being a foreigner to the case.
A clear proof is how the typographic error (which the high court has sounded as a key evidence being likely forged in its judgement), has been just mentioned as a side note.
I would suggest viewers to watch beyond reasonable doubt - a CNA documentsry on the same subject, for a more thoroigh understanding of the case.
Like the police investigation and the 2 cbi teams, this documentary falters, not because it does not present facts, but because it selectively presents facts which suit the narrative which indicates a clear bias.
Without divulging the details, I would mention that the director has decided on his version of truth, which might be prejudiced by his assistants, because of his being a foreigner to the case.
A clear proof is how the typographic error (which the high court has sounded as a key evidence being likely forged in its judgement), has been just mentioned as a side note.
I would suggest viewers to watch beyond reasonable doubt - a CNA documentsry on the same subject, for a more thoroigh understanding of the case.