La aclamada autora e historiadora Deborah E Lipstadt debe luchar por la verdad histórica y demostrar que el Holocausto realmente ocurrió cuando el negacionista David Irving la demanda por di... Leer todoLa aclamada autora e historiadora Deborah E Lipstadt debe luchar por la verdad histórica y demostrar que el Holocausto realmente ocurrió cuando el negacionista David Irving la demanda por difamación.La aclamada autora e historiadora Deborah E Lipstadt debe luchar por la verdad histórica y demostrar que el Holocausto realmente ocurrió cuando el negacionista David Irving la demanda por difamación.
- Nominada a1 premio BAFTA
- 7 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaAll the dialogue in the courtroom scenes is taken verbatim from the trial records.
- ErroresThere are numerous references by the lawyer and by leading counsel to British and/or UK law, which does not exist. English law and Scottish law are different and therefore the reference should only have been to English law. There are also several references to 'discovery' which is an American legal term. The English equivalent would be disclosure, and the English legal team would certainly have known this and used the correct terminology.
- Citas
Deborah Lipstadt: Now, some people are saying that the result of this trial will threaten free speech. I don't accept that. I'm not attacking free speech. On the contrary, I've been defending it against someone who wanted to abuse it. Freedom of speech means you can say whatever you want. What you can't do is lie, and then expect not to be held accountable for it. Not all opinions are equal. And some things happened, just like we say they do. Slavery happened, the Black Death happened. The Earth is round, the ice caps are melting, and Elvis is not alive.
- ConexionesFeatured in Film '72: Episode #46.2 (2017)
All the dialogue pertaining to the defense's fascinating legal strategy went over very well with me. That and the much appreciated verbatim courtroom dialogue comprises most of the script. My positive impressions were reinforced by subsequent research into the trial. Denial delves into the sinister practice of Holocaust denialism at its best. I stretched my viewing over several hours and basked in the cerebral delight of it.
Rachel Weisz has been given flak for a performance that did not leave me in want of anything. Though I would not say it was an award-worthy performance, I chalk that up more to the formulaic production than any shortcoming of hers. Tom Wilkinson deserves mention as her character's barrister. Timothy Spall is terrific as David Irving!
This glowing review notwithstanding, Denial has the feel of excellent television, which is no way to compliment a feature film. The defense's true-to-life legal strategy necessarily undercut the film's emotive power. The scenes at Auschwitz itself are therefore especially vital to its success for me. Including London's Boadicea and Her Daughters was a nice touch.
- Arcturus1980
- 8 nov 2018
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
- How long is Denial?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 10,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 4,073,489
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 93,728
- 2 oct 2016
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 7,994,527
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 49 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1