Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.
Angela Paula Stander
- $50,000 Bucks Audience Member
- (as Angela Stander)
6.316.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Opiniones destacadas
Now You Wish You Hadn't See Them...
This was a very disappointing sequel that manages to completely miss anything good from the previous entries. The new characters don't come across as clever or appealing in any way and instead come across as annoying and ridiculous. The previous entries were entertaining and often thought provoking. This latest entry feels more like a chore to sit through and if they can't make a better sequel than this, it's probably time to stop making new entries in this "Now You See Me" franchise.
Boring
My least favorite of the three movies. Felt like I was watching an escape room movie. Kind of boring. Love the actors, but just fell flat for me. Luckily I saw the preview for free. Just wasn't as thrilling and entertaining as the other two movies. I'd suggest waiting til it comes out on a streaming platform. . .
A blatant, uninteresting and lazy rehash of the the second entry in the franchise.
"Now You See Me 3" is by far the worst entry in the franchise.
While the second movie was already inferior to the first, at least it expanded the world and took the story in a new direction. With nine years to develop a sequel, you'd expect something fresh, ambitious, and worthy of the franchise. Instead, the filmmakers went for the laziest option possible: a blatant rehash of the first two films-especially the second-recycling the same story beats, structure, and even the same type of plot twist, just with different characters.
The movie is full of overused tropes executed in the most uninteresting way. The dialogue is poor, character interactions even poorer, and the new characters add nothing except clutter, stealing screen time from the main cast-who end up feeling like guests in their own franchise. Even the visuals feel tired and uninspired, which is especially disappointing given the potential of such a unique premise and the always-wonderful cast. With these characters and this setup, the film could have delivered inventive storytelling and striking set pieces-but it doesn't.
A fourth movie is teased, and if it ever happens, I sincerely hope they hire a writer and director interested in making the sequel this franchise actually deserves.
While the second movie was already inferior to the first, at least it expanded the world and took the story in a new direction. With nine years to develop a sequel, you'd expect something fresh, ambitious, and worthy of the franchise. Instead, the filmmakers went for the laziest option possible: a blatant rehash of the first two films-especially the second-recycling the same story beats, structure, and even the same type of plot twist, just with different characters.
The movie is full of overused tropes executed in the most uninteresting way. The dialogue is poor, character interactions even poorer, and the new characters add nothing except clutter, stealing screen time from the main cast-who end up feeling like guests in their own franchise. Even the visuals feel tired and uninspired, which is especially disappointing given the potential of such a unique premise and the always-wonderful cast. With these characters and this setup, the film could have delivered inventive storytelling and striking set pieces-but it doesn't.
A fourth movie is teased, and if it ever happens, I sincerely hope they hire a writer and director interested in making the sequel this franchise actually deserves.
10 Horsemen is 6 too many.
There are just far too many team members now (9 active to the plot and 1 more thrown in at the very end), and still it was missing one notable name from the second movie that would have elevated it more.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
I wanted to love it
I have just watched the third film in this series, set roughly 10 years after the last.
The whole movie is around 10 people bickering. It is exhausting to watch and listen to. This movie is definitely for a younger generation than the last as this sort of constant barrage of verbal intercourse reminds me more of college kids bantering than anything else.
So, regardless of that its okay. Nice to see the band back together. Nothing going to set the world alight here just okay.
We do end up with what feels like the 10 horsemen but feel free to disagree.
The whole movie is around 10 people bickering. It is exhausting to watch and listen to. This movie is definitely for a younger generation than the last as this sort of constant barrage of verbal intercourse reminds me more of college kids bantering than anything else.
So, regardless of that its okay. Nice to see the band back together. Nothing going to set the world alight here just okay.
We do end up with what feels like the 10 horsemen but feel free to disagree.
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
See a full list of all the movies coming to theaters this fall.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe film was announced by Lions Gate Entertainment CEO Jon Feltheimer in May 2015, more than a year before Los ilusionistas 2 (2016) was released in June 2016.
- ErroresMerritt McKinney knew what had happened to Thaddeus Bradley after Merrit was brought directly to the police station and the cell, likely without talking to anybody. He would not have known as he didn't see the shooting.
- ConexionesFollows Los ilusionistas: Nada es lo que parece (2013)
- Bandas sonorasCrusades
written by Max Bassin, Dominic DiGesu, Gus Green, Foster Hudson, Cameron Winter
performed by Geese
courtesy of: Partisan Records / PIAS
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
- How long is Now You See Me: Now You Don't?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Now You See Me: Now You Don't
- Locaciones de filmación
- Bélgica(Exterior)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 90,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 49,678,000
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 21,013,793
- 16 nov 2025
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 186,978,000
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 53min(113 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta







