Una nueva generación de detectives vuelven a trabajar para el misterioso Charlie.Una nueva generación de detectives vuelven a trabajar para el misterioso Charlie.Una nueva generación de detectives vuelven a trabajar para el misterioso Charlie.
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 9 nominaciones en total
Hannah Hoekstra
- Ingrid (Angel)
- (as Hanna Hoekstra)
5.084.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Opiniones destacadas
The critics are nuts
My husband and I just watched this and we thought it was great! It was funny and action packed. Highly recommended. People need to stop picking apart every little thing and just enjoy stuff.
10necsitm
Good Fun Movie
I really liked this movie and hate that I did not give it a chance. The previews when it first came out did not sell it good. But it is a continuation of the series and the two movies, and it is more advanced and with the times. I actually loved the cast. If you have not seen it, watch it it's a good fun time!!!!
People dont get it!!!
The kind of Angels films were never supposed to be serious, why most of people take it so serious to watch and bang them mercilessly afterwards is way over my head. It's a fun watch with all the silliness come with it, ain't it?
I loved it
It's difficult for me to understand the HATE for this movie when you factor out the - honestly cliche - misogyny + self importance combo. And I refuse to believe ALL of its haters are self important misogynists.
It's a fun movie. An action comedy production that does not take itself as seriously as the Bond franchise, for example. It's honest and very similar to it's predecessors, with the benefit of better technology and cinematography of its time.
Its silly, because it was always supposed to be silly. There's no man hating, AT ALL, no matter what the other reviews say. It is, yes, heavy on its feminism, but I trust by now we learned that feminism does not equal man hating? Good.
Kristen Stewart is a gem in this. And I didn't even like her before. Sam Claflin is also, muah. Chefs kiss.
Elizabeth Bank's wig could be better.
Don't take it so seriously. Have a drink, relax, stop wanting every movie to be a masterpiece even when it doesn't promise to be.
I honest to God loved this one. Couldn't watch it in the movies, but it's practically on repeat on my TV.
(The only unforgivable sin was Sabina's Portuguese on the beggining. Yikes)
10capnsol
Tons of silly fun!
Tons of fun. Fits perfectly in the genre of silly action movie that doesn't try to be realistic or serious. Along the lines of The Fast and the Furious.
All of the main characters have a good dose of personality, and they're all fun to watch, and clearly having fun making it, Jane to a lesser extent, but she is playing the serious character, so not really her fault.
It's a pretty funny movie, mostly intentional, but there are also a few moments of unintentional humor that just add to the intentional humor. The setting montages are poorly edited, but this ends up adding to the goodness of the movie because they're so good-bad. The CGI is similar in this regard. There are a couple moments when it looks rather cheap. But as I said, it just adds on to the healthy dose of intentional humor.
Some people are saying this reboot was pointless or unnecessary, but I disagree. It's been a long time since the last Charlie's Angels. I watched it not long ago and it felt so dated it lost my attention. I'm not saying it's bad, but it's very much from a different era.
For the record, I would actually give this an 8/10, but since all the butthurt neck beards with fragile egos are giving this 1s and 2s, I'm trying to restore balance to the force.
All of the main characters have a good dose of personality, and they're all fun to watch, and clearly having fun making it, Jane to a lesser extent, but she is playing the serious character, so not really her fault.
It's a pretty funny movie, mostly intentional, but there are also a few moments of unintentional humor that just add to the intentional humor. The setting montages are poorly edited, but this ends up adding to the goodness of the movie because they're so good-bad. The CGI is similar in this regard. There are a couple moments when it looks rather cheap. But as I said, it just adds on to the healthy dose of intentional humor.
Some people are saying this reboot was pointless or unnecessary, but I disagree. It's been a long time since the last Charlie's Angels. I watched it not long ago and it felt so dated it lost my attention. I'm not saying it's bad, but it's very much from a different era.
For the record, I would actually give this an 8/10, but since all the butthurt neck beards with fragile egos are giving this 1s and 2s, I'm trying to restore balance to the force.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe movie features extensive use of guns and other explosive weaponry. This is a marked change from Los Ángeles de Charlie (2000) and Los Ángeles de Charlie: Al límite (2003), in which star and executive producer Drew Barrymore insisted that the Angels use no guns at all and almost no weapons aside from their own martial arts skills.
- ErroresAfter Edgar's car sinks, Jane dives and struggles with the door in order to save Elena. However, since the rear window was totally broken during the car chase, Elena could simply swim through it.
- Citas
Jane Kano: I need you to exhibit some attention-seeking behavior.
Sabina Wilson: I have so many ideas.
- Créditos curiososDuring the end credits, there are several scenes showing Elena being trained to be an Angel. Famous athletes and models play the instructing Angels.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Upcoming Comedy Movies That Might Suck (2019)
- Bandas sonorasPantera
Written by Elof Loelv, Andres Torres, Mauricio Rengifo, Alyssa Lourdiz Cantu, Anitta (as Larissa De Macedo Machado), Umberto Tavares and Pablo Christian Fuentes
Produced by Elof Loelv
Performed by Anitta
Anitta appears courtesy of Warner Music (Brasil), Ltd., a Warner Music Group Company
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Charlie's Angels?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Charlie's Angels
- Locaciones de filmación
- Estambul, Turquía(location)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 48,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 17,803,077
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 8,351,109
- 17 nov 2019
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 73,279,888
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 58min(118 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta






