La historia de los primeros treinta años después del primer viaje de Colón al Nuevo Mundo.La historia de los primeros treinta años después del primer viaje de Colón al Nuevo Mundo.La historia de los primeros treinta años después del primer viaje de Colón al Nuevo Mundo.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Explorar episodios
Opiniones destacadas
I was surprised to see a spanish tv show with such an incredible deployment of resources.
Good actors, and incredibly perfect and accurate locations, armours, weaponry, costume design, dressings, ships, settings...
Perfect timeline, each chapter following the course of the history.
Maybe the narrative is somewhat too hypercritical and bitter.
Lousy series dealing with the first thirty years after Columbus' first voyage to the New World. So Christopher Columbus followed the route to Cathay and Cipango and found an unknown continent, which caused the world to change profoundly. If the Vikings were there, or perhaps the Chinese, the Egyptians or the Basques is irrelevant, the important thing was Columbus' feat.
A series that can be categorized as another film nail within the 'anti-Spanish Black Legend'. The film talks about many conquerors, but always from a negative and predatory point of view, concerning Christopher Columbus and other discoverers and conquistadors from highest to lowest rank including: Magellan, Juan Sebastian El Cano who made the first journey around the world, Vasoco Nuñez de Balboa discoverer of Pacific Ocean - the latter was executed by Pedrerias Davila-, Cortes, Pizarro, Alvarado, Panfilo de Narvaez discoverer of Florida, Ponce de León in search for eternal youth fountain, Jeronimo Aguilar, Gonzalo Guerrero, Ojeda, Cabeza de Vaca, the cartographer Santoñes Juan de la Cosa, among others. Spain left an unrepeatable legacy in the form of universities, hospitals, cathedrals with gilded altarpieces, as well as a fair legislative body such as the laws of Burgos of 1512 or the bases of international humanitarian law of the School of Salamanca in the 16th century, with its main representatives, pioneers of the fight for human rights: Francisco Suárez and Francisco de Vitoria, the latter considered the main founder of the School of Salamanca and father of international law and honoured by the United Nations; adding the Valladolid Controversy, the famous debate that took place in 1551 at the College of San Gregorio in Valladolid, within the so-called controversy of the natives and which faced two antagonistic ways of conceiving the conquest of America, romantically interpreted as that of the defenders and that of the enemies of the Indians: the first, represented by Bartolomé de las Casas; and the second, by Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda. This biased series does not want to highlight all these things, gloating over the negative, sordidness, exploitation, giving a destrictive, greedy, gold-hungry, absolutely genocidal image and focusing on the abuses that did occur, but in their fair terms.
Among the continuous nonsense, inaccuracies and exaggerations that appear in the series there are: continuous hangings, Bartholomew Columbus shooting simple natives as if he were shooting clay pigeons. Among the barbarities said by a voice-over (with words created by the director himself): the native Indians are treated by the Spanish worse than dogs; that on the discovery ships there were only people of bad living, thieves and slavers. Without stopping to criticize the evangelizing work of the Catholic Church, and laughing at Popes like Innocent VIII who is seen with sveral children and eager to drink a woman's milk, and appearing in the foreground a young woman's temptations taking said milk to feed him.
As soon as the technical section is done painfully, without order or concert, it goes from a discoverer and conqueror, and again returns to what had been left off in another episode. The series is therefore totally disjointed, uneven, twisted and frankly depressing. Adding a colorless, pale, dark cinematography, it would have been better if it had been done in black and white. While the actors, all unknown, except for the already aged Aitana Sanchez Gijón as Queen Isabel of Castile, are dedicated to declaiming or shouting the insipid phrases.
It is quite true that the greatest propagators of the Black legend are the Spanish themselves. Look at the case of this same series, or that of historical characters like traitor Antonio López , Felipe II's secretary, he betrayed his country because he did not achieve the favors that he wanted to deserve or the exaggerations of Bartolome de las Casas, apostle of the Indians, but who in his starts advocated bringing blacks from Africa to make them slaves, since they had no soul. Hatred of Spain has its biggest haters within our nation, because being close to something similar to Hispanophilia puts you at the same level as the infamous inquisitor Torquemada
But the main person responsible for this terrible and disastrous series is its writer and director Israel del Santo. The filmmaker is a presumptuous, conceited author who wrote and directed this terrible series, thanks to nefarious advisors from Telefonica, Moviestar, who really cannot believe that they finance his embarrassing series, - it could be that some of them are part of the family. So Israel himself, without any preparation, takes on the task of writing a historical series of 8 episodes, resulting in disastrous results. I have seen lots of series but I have never seen one in which the same showrunner is the director, not so in feature films where it is usual for the writing and direction to be by the same person. But besides, it is not only this one, Del Santo has also created other series in which he has also expelled his inner bile, such as "The Templars", in which they and the crusaders appeared as evil criminals who exterminated the peaceful and good Muslims, wrongly trying to kick them out of their own countries: Spain and the Holy Land. Thus he directed the series "The Heart of the Empire" in which the Roman men were truly vicious, brutal, who continually mistreated women and dedicated themselves fully to slavery. Gloating over nudism, the sordid, violent world of the Romans. I would advise this filmmaker to focus on interview series like "Lina¨ and Lola" and not dedicate himself to historical narratives that he is not prepared for, nor has any idea about. Rating: 2.5/10.
A series that can be categorized as another film nail within the 'anti-Spanish Black Legend'. The film talks about many conquerors, but always from a negative and predatory point of view, concerning Christopher Columbus and other discoverers and conquistadors from highest to lowest rank including: Magellan, Juan Sebastian El Cano who made the first journey around the world, Vasoco Nuñez de Balboa discoverer of Pacific Ocean - the latter was executed by Pedrerias Davila-, Cortes, Pizarro, Alvarado, Panfilo de Narvaez discoverer of Florida, Ponce de León in search for eternal youth fountain, Jeronimo Aguilar, Gonzalo Guerrero, Ojeda, Cabeza de Vaca, the cartographer Santoñes Juan de la Cosa, among others. Spain left an unrepeatable legacy in the form of universities, hospitals, cathedrals with gilded altarpieces, as well as a fair legislative body such as the laws of Burgos of 1512 or the bases of international humanitarian law of the School of Salamanca in the 16th century, with its main representatives, pioneers of the fight for human rights: Francisco Suárez and Francisco de Vitoria, the latter considered the main founder of the School of Salamanca and father of international law and honoured by the United Nations; adding the Valladolid Controversy, the famous debate that took place in 1551 at the College of San Gregorio in Valladolid, within the so-called controversy of the natives and which faced two antagonistic ways of conceiving the conquest of America, romantically interpreted as that of the defenders and that of the enemies of the Indians: the first, represented by Bartolomé de las Casas; and the second, by Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda. This biased series does not want to highlight all these things, gloating over the negative, sordidness, exploitation, giving a destrictive, greedy, gold-hungry, absolutely genocidal image and focusing on the abuses that did occur, but in their fair terms.
Among the continuous nonsense, inaccuracies and exaggerations that appear in the series there are: continuous hangings, Bartholomew Columbus shooting simple natives as if he were shooting clay pigeons. Among the barbarities said by a voice-over (with words created by the director himself): the native Indians are treated by the Spanish worse than dogs; that on the discovery ships there were only people of bad living, thieves and slavers. Without stopping to criticize the evangelizing work of the Catholic Church, and laughing at Popes like Innocent VIII who is seen with sveral children and eager to drink a woman's milk, and appearing in the foreground a young woman's temptations taking said milk to feed him.
As soon as the technical section is done painfully, without order or concert, it goes from a discoverer and conqueror, and again returns to what had been left off in another episode. The series is therefore totally disjointed, uneven, twisted and frankly depressing. Adding a colorless, pale, dark cinematography, it would have been better if it had been done in black and white. While the actors, all unknown, except for the already aged Aitana Sanchez Gijón as Queen Isabel of Castile, are dedicated to declaiming or shouting the insipid phrases.
It is quite true that the greatest propagators of the Black legend are the Spanish themselves. Look at the case of this same series, or that of historical characters like traitor Antonio López , Felipe II's secretary, he betrayed his country because he did not achieve the favors that he wanted to deserve or the exaggerations of Bartolome de las Casas, apostle of the Indians, but who in his starts advocated bringing blacks from Africa to make them slaves, since they had no soul. Hatred of Spain has its biggest haters within our nation, because being close to something similar to Hispanophilia puts you at the same level as the infamous inquisitor Torquemada
But the main person responsible for this terrible and disastrous series is its writer and director Israel del Santo. The filmmaker is a presumptuous, conceited author who wrote and directed this terrible series, thanks to nefarious advisors from Telefonica, Moviestar, who really cannot believe that they finance his embarrassing series, - it could be that some of them are part of the family. So Israel himself, without any preparation, takes on the task of writing a historical series of 8 episodes, resulting in disastrous results. I have seen lots of series but I have never seen one in which the same showrunner is the director, not so in feature films where it is usual for the writing and direction to be by the same person. But besides, it is not only this one, Del Santo has also created other series in which he has also expelled his inner bile, such as "The Templars", in which they and the crusaders appeared as evil criminals who exterminated the peaceful and good Muslims, wrongly trying to kick them out of their own countries: Spain and the Holy Land. Thus he directed the series "The Heart of the Empire" in which the Roman men were truly vicious, brutal, who continually mistreated women and dedicated themselves fully to slavery. Gloating over nudism, the sordid, violent world of the Romans. I would advise this filmmaker to focus on interview series like "Lina¨ and Lola" and not dedicate himself to historical narratives that he is not prepared for, nor has any idea about. Rating: 2.5/10.
Another unfortunate example of history rewriting. There is good screenplay, reasonable acting and a solid work in costumes but the core is worthless. There is not a single good intention, glory or values in the characters depicted.
It seems that Queen Elizabeth was a widow? At that time, Spain was already unified and an entity by itself and Fernando and Elizabeth were ruling all territories together.
Just something to think about: If the Spaniard were such a group of raiders, rapers and genocides, how is possible that LATAM is full of Indians, whereas the Brits and later their colonies took over the native population was almost eradicated?
It seems that Queen Elizabeth was a widow? At that time, Spain was already unified and an entity by itself and Fernando and Elizabeth were ruling all territories together.
Just something to think about: If the Spaniard were such a group of raiders, rapers and genocides, how is possible that LATAM is full of Indians, whereas the Brits and later their colonies took over the native population was almost eradicated?
A lot of money on this TV show but if you are trying to tell what happened after the discovery only 30 years after, you can't ignore the conquest of the Mexica (Aztec) empire by Cortes or Central America by Alvarado.
Unfortunately not much about the epic exploration of Cabeza de Vaca from Florida to California, the born of California itself or the Inca empire...
Tons of things happened but we always get the same, rude swordsmen on the front line of combat... I would like to see ever settlers, trade, cities foundation, law, administration, miscegenation...because they did it all and very fast by the way.
Unfortunately not much about the epic exploration of Cabeza de Vaca from Florida to California, the born of California itself or the Inca empire...
Tons of things happened but we always get the same, rude swordsmen on the front line of combat... I would like to see ever settlers, trade, cities foundation, law, administration, miscegenation...because they did it all and very fast by the way.
Honestly, I see here an attempt of telling the history by its name, how it was, and no how we want it to be on our role of conquerors on conquered, far from victimhood or heroism. The only thing I see is that is going only on a light and superficial way over it, 8 chapters of 45- 50 minutes are not enough to go though 30 of the most important years on the history of the world...a lot of things untold...but on the overall, I really like the raw way it is explained that it was the people with firm ideals together with the people from the low society, and not kings (except Isabel of Castilla) and nobles, the people who made it...and not because of Christian purposes on the most of the cases.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe story of the first thirty years after Columbus' first voyage to the New World.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Conquistadores Adventum have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- I kataktisi tis Amerikis
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 4K UHD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Conquistadores Adventum (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda