Sigue a una enfermera piadosa que se obsesiona peligrosamente con salvar el alma de una paciente terminal, a cualquier precio.Sigue a una enfermera piadosa que se obsesiona peligrosamente con salvar el alma de una paciente terminal, a cualquier precio.Sigue a una enfermera piadosa que se obsesiona peligrosamente con salvar el alma de una paciente terminal, a cualquier precio.
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Estrellas
- Nominada a2premios BAFTA
- 11 premios ganados y 33 nominaciones en total
Sona Vyas
- Agency Worker
- (as Sona Vyas Dunne)
Antony Barlow
- Passerby
- (sin créditos)
- …
- Dirección
- Escritura
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
6.654.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Opiniones destacadas
Criminal marketing!
The elements of thrill and horror are negligible in this movie.
Does that mean it isn't good? Not quite, rather that the marketing campaign went terribly wrong and people are left feeling being mis-sold. I don't blame them.
All in all a better than average psychological drama that will leave undisturbed the most.
Word of advice for hardcore horror fans: cancel any expectation you might have of getting scared watching this because chances are you won't.
Maud fraud
My problem with Saint Maud is I was expecting a horror movie and this isn't. Maud is a character study of a young nurse (Morfydd Clark) in emotional turmoil. Saint Maud sets a dour mood. It favors symbolism over hard core action. I'm not saying it's a bad movie. I didn't find enough to hold on to. Details about Maud, the person, are sparse and come too late in the movie. By then I had lost interest.
Maud is a hospice nurse for Amanda (Jennifer Ehle), a former dancer suffering from terminal cancer. She holds to her devout faith with slavish piousness. She left her previous nursing job abruptly, we aren't sure why. She sees things no one else sees that border on the paranormal. She comes to believe she has been sent to save Amanda's soul. Why? I didn't understand why Maud was obsessed with Amanda. The two women didn't really connect and had little in common.
The character of Amanda is excellent, by the way. She was full of contradictions, capable of great tenderness and terrible cruelty. When she is on screen I wanted to know more about her but the focus remains squarely on Maud.
Clark's performance as Maud is empathetic but a bit one note. She too often has a deer in the headlights gaze and seems out of step with the world around her. If that is the intent, Clark did her job well. I wasn't able to connect with the character. She experiences one ominous happening after another, but the action doesn't build to a focused point. I felt like I was drifting at sea watching Maud. She is clearly a young woman full of doubt and conflict. Yet, I wasn't getting to know the real her.
The strange events happening may be real or may all be in the mind of one disturbed individual. We are never given enough concrete evidence to decide. Perhaps that's the point but after a while I felt like I was running on a treadmill. It takes until the last few scenes to move the narrative forward. These scenes are genuinely scary, disturbing and moving. Sadly, the payoff comes too late, in my opinion.
Maud is a hospice nurse for Amanda (Jennifer Ehle), a former dancer suffering from terminal cancer. She holds to her devout faith with slavish piousness. She left her previous nursing job abruptly, we aren't sure why. She sees things no one else sees that border on the paranormal. She comes to believe she has been sent to save Amanda's soul. Why? I didn't understand why Maud was obsessed with Amanda. The two women didn't really connect and had little in common.
The character of Amanda is excellent, by the way. She was full of contradictions, capable of great tenderness and terrible cruelty. When she is on screen I wanted to know more about her but the focus remains squarely on Maud.
Clark's performance as Maud is empathetic but a bit one note. She too often has a deer in the headlights gaze and seems out of step with the world around her. If that is the intent, Clark did her job well. I wasn't able to connect with the character. She experiences one ominous happening after another, but the action doesn't build to a focused point. I felt like I was drifting at sea watching Maud. She is clearly a young woman full of doubt and conflict. Yet, I wasn't getting to know the real her.
The strange events happening may be real or may all be in the mind of one disturbed individual. We are never given enough concrete evidence to decide. Perhaps that's the point but after a while I felt like I was running on a treadmill. It takes until the last few scenes to move the narrative forward. These scenes are genuinely scary, disturbing and moving. Sadly, the payoff comes too late, in my opinion.
"Never Waste Your Pain!"...
In SAINT MAUD, we learn early on that the title character (Morfydd Clark) is a young nurse and a devoted Catholic. There are hints of a tragic event in her recent past. Upon taking her new position at the residence of a terminally ill woman (Jennifer Ehle), we soon learn that Maud is also prone to having religious ecstacies.
When Maud's employment is ended due to her over-zealous convictions, her descent begins.
Or is it a sort of dark ascent?
Director Rose Glass keeps the mood cold, and the atmosphere bleak. We're kept guessing as to whether Maud is having a true spiritual experience, or suffering from severe mental illness. It does lean in one direction, but we're never quite sure. Ms. Clark plays Maud in a genuine, unaffected way, making her believable, and all the more terrifying.
A unique horror film for those looking for something very different...
When Maud's employment is ended due to her over-zealous convictions, her descent begins.
Or is it a sort of dark ascent?
Director Rose Glass keeps the mood cold, and the atmosphere bleak. We're kept guessing as to whether Maud is having a true spiritual experience, or suffering from severe mental illness. It does lean in one direction, but we're never quite sure. Ms. Clark plays Maud in a genuine, unaffected way, making her believable, and all the more terrifying.
A unique horror film for those looking for something very different...
When the critics all fall into line
This is one of those movies where a couple of critics overdo their reviews and all the others feel they have to do the same or they will look dumb. So it gets overhyped. What happens here is a perfectly decent movie gets so hyped you are always going to be disappointed because it cannot possibly live up to that hyped reviewers drivel. Its a smart, clever movie that takes a while to get going, has a lot of padding and is not in any way a real horror film. It most certainly isnt "the scariest film of the decade" or whever that nonsense said. The lead is very good as is almost all the cast - pointless as some of them were. I liked the ending, thoiugh it was a little predictable. As an exploration of religious fervour in the wrong mind and the damage that can do, it certainly succeeds but if you are expecting the exorcist or anything like it, you will be disappointed. This is yet another example of critics trying to show how clever they are and at the same time, causing the movie to disappoint movie goers who, had they ignored those critics would probably have said, yeah, that was pretty good that - which is pretty much all it is. Scarborough is gorgeous as always though. if you've nebver been you should, quintessential English holiday spot.
Don't write this off as a simple horror
Because it's more than that. It's also a study of loneliness (of both main characters) and obsession. It does have its shock moments, not least when in becomes clear that Maud is not the clear-cut character you thought she was.
As I left the cinema, I quoted Dave Allen to myself: "I'm an atheist, thank God."
As I left the cinema, I quoted Dave Allen to myself: "I'm an atheist, thank God."
Every A24 Horror Movie, Ranked by IMDb Rating
Every A24 Horror Movie, Ranked by IMDb Rating
A24 has produced some of the most memorable horror films of the 21st century. See which films ranked highest on IMDb.
Banda sonora
Previsualiza la banda sonora aquí y sigue escuchando en Amazon Music.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaRose Glass originally wrote Maud with a more explicit backstory, but removed most of it in the final draft as she found it too similar to Carrie (1976), saying: "In early drafts, the character's backstory was quite different, she had this very extreme religious upbringing, went to Catholic school, all that stuff. But it just felt like a story I'd seen before, and it wasn't one I was particularly interested in retelling."
- Créditos curiososThe cockroach is credited as Nancy and is presumably named after Nancy Spungen. "Bug Wrangler," Grace Dickinson had another one called Sid.
- Bandas sonorasCareless
Performed by Al Bowlly
Written by Lew Quadling, Dick Jurgens and Eddy Howard
Bourne Co. (ASCAP)
All Rights Administered by Warner Chappell Music Ltd
Licensed Courtesy of Warner Music UK
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Saint Maud?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- GBP 1,800,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 1,383,868
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 24min(84 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta




