Agrega una trama en tu idiomaThe one-time partnership between two men has turned into a full-fledged range war. Roy is the son of one of the former partners, the heroine is daughter to the other. The film featured and d... Leer todoThe one-time partnership between two men has turned into a full-fledged range war. Roy is the son of one of the former partners, the heroine is daughter to the other. The film featured and debuted the then-popular radio duo Lulubelle and Scotty.The one-time partnership between two men has turned into a full-fledged range war. Roy is the son of one of the former partners, the heroine is daughter to the other. The film featured and debuted the then-popular radio duo Lulubelle and Scotty.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Lynne Roberts
- Claire Brower
- (as Mary Hart)
Myrtle Wiseman
- Lulu Belle
- (as Lulu Belle and Scotty)
Scotty Wiseman
- Scotty
- (as Lulu Belle and Scotty)
Chris Allen
- Man at Picnic
- (sin créditos)
Horace B. Carpenter
- Man at Meeting
- (sin créditos)
George DeNormand
- Henchman
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Though certainly worth watching for the energy of the very likable Roy Rogers in one of his earliest starring roles, this is really just an average Western, at least by the standard of most of Rogers's movies. The story has enough to be worth watching, and there are some good moments, but not a lot more.
The plot in this one has Roy in old Wyoming, where a gang of nasty cattle rustlers has been causing havoc and suspicion. Roy has to protect his ranching partner, figure out how the rustlers are operating, and convince a rather dull-witted sheriff of the facts. The plot that follows has a few too many holes this time, but it does contain some decent action.
There is a bit more singing here than you usually find in the early Rogers features. Mary Hart (Lynne Roberts) also appears as the heroine, though there is not a lot of help from the rest of the cast. All of Rogers's movies are watchable if you like Westerns, and this early feature certainly should not be evaluated too harshly, but it really is just an average effort.
The plot in this one has Roy in old Wyoming, where a gang of nasty cattle rustlers has been causing havoc and suspicion. Roy has to protect his ranching partner, figure out how the rustlers are operating, and convince a rather dull-witted sheriff of the facts. The plot that follows has a few too many holes this time, but it does contain some decent action.
There is a bit more singing here than you usually find in the early Rogers features. Mary Hart (Lynne Roberts) also appears as the heroine, though there is not a lot of help from the rest of the cast. All of Rogers's movies are watchable if you like Westerns, and this early feature certainly should not be evaluated too harshly, but it really is just an average effort.
"Shine on Harvest Moon" is an early Roy Rogers film that, unfortunately, was been trimmed to fit television time slots of the 1950s. Fortunately, it was trimmed less than many of his films (they removed four minutes). And, perhaps there is an original length version out there somewhere...though the two on YouTube were trimmed. The two were also very blurry copies and the prints are badly in need to conservation and cleaning (and yes, I did try watching both just to see if one was appreciably better).
When the story begins, evil Pa Jackson and his two evil sons arrive at the Brower-Rogers ranch. They try to muscle in on the place and Jackson tries to force his old partner, Milt Brower, to throw in with him. Fortunately, his current partner, Roy Rogers, arrives to stop the Jacksons. Then, Pa Jackson announces he's going to destroy everyone and will begin a reign of terror in the area*. Now WHY didn't Roy just shoot them then and there?! Yes, I know cowboy heroes aren't supposed to do this! But at least, why didn't he take the three crooks to the sheriff?! After all, they attacked Brower and made a lot of threats! Sure enough, soon the trio begin shooting up the area and spread a wave of terror around the Tetons in Wyoming. The rest of the film is how they eventually stop these evil jerks who terrorize the territory and claim to be in charge!
This Roy Rogers film is a bit unusual because Roy has no sidekick. This certainly isn't unheard of though I would have loved to have seen Gabby Hayes there to give the story a bit more color. But like most of his films, if not all, there' a bit of singing...and it's pretty enjoyable, though I laugh when I imagine real cowboys singing on the prairie! Overall, a modestly enjoyable film--pretty average for the franchise. My only gripe is listed above...when you are threatened and the baddie tells you what he's going to do after you release him, why release him in the first place?!? It does seem like a serious weakness to the plot.
*The film seems to indicate that Jackson Hole (the valley around Jackson, Wyoming) was named after this rogue. Well, that's not the case....and is a bit of fiction. It was actually named for the trapper and explorer David Edward Jackson...who bore no resemblance to Pa Jackson nor his evil spawn.
When the story begins, evil Pa Jackson and his two evil sons arrive at the Brower-Rogers ranch. They try to muscle in on the place and Jackson tries to force his old partner, Milt Brower, to throw in with him. Fortunately, his current partner, Roy Rogers, arrives to stop the Jacksons. Then, Pa Jackson announces he's going to destroy everyone and will begin a reign of terror in the area*. Now WHY didn't Roy just shoot them then and there?! Yes, I know cowboy heroes aren't supposed to do this! But at least, why didn't he take the three crooks to the sheriff?! After all, they attacked Brower and made a lot of threats! Sure enough, soon the trio begin shooting up the area and spread a wave of terror around the Tetons in Wyoming. The rest of the film is how they eventually stop these evil jerks who terrorize the territory and claim to be in charge!
This Roy Rogers film is a bit unusual because Roy has no sidekick. This certainly isn't unheard of though I would have loved to have seen Gabby Hayes there to give the story a bit more color. But like most of his films, if not all, there' a bit of singing...and it's pretty enjoyable, though I laugh when I imagine real cowboys singing on the prairie! Overall, a modestly enjoyable film--pretty average for the franchise. My only gripe is listed above...when you are threatened and the baddie tells you what he's going to do after you release him, why release him in the first place?!? It does seem like a serious weakness to the plot.
*The film seems to indicate that Jackson Hole (the valley around Jackson, Wyoming) was named after this rogue. Well, that's not the case....and is a bit of fiction. It was actually named for the trapper and explorer David Edward Jackson...who bore no resemblance to Pa Jackson nor his evil spawn.
I appreciate the modest but visually fetching set design and decoration, and costume design. I appreciate the directness of the plot - certainly in terms of notably lacking subtlety, but more so by way of maintaining a brisk pace. I like the concept of the plot, though the antagonism of character Pa Jackson feels wholly contrived, more "plot device" than "authentic." In a way not too dissimilar, there's an unmistakable sense in the arrangement of each scene, the pacing and basic execution - most often and especially (though not always) when any degree of violence is involved - of how very staged the production is. 'Shine on, Harvest Moon' aims for rudimentary entertainment in the essence of the tale being told, not any feeling of realism. There's no questioning that this is purely intentional, and an affect of director Joseph Kane's style: he has a substantial list of credits to his name, after all, and the same rather stilted, almost wooden lack of genuineness also comes across in many of the performances, which I can only assume is a result of Kane's guidance and oversight. Truly, this is a movie of simpler amusement, for a simpler time.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, of course. However, to visit titles of this tenor, in this time frame, more than 80 years on, is an experience that's more than a little jarring. Then factor in the frequent inclusion of songs (if not also some dance), as was common to not just a lot of western films of the period but those of Roy Rogers specifically, and watching 'Shine on, Harvest Moon' becomes a slightly bewildering experience. It's not at all bad - it is enjoyable, truthfully - and I admire the work that all involved put into the feature. Moreover, while there's a lot of unconvincing acting on hand, this isn't to say that the cast is without any skill. Despite the ham-handed of the production, accentuating fundamental diversion over robust movie-going reward, at some points we do see some swell glimmers of range and nuance denoting the capabilities the actors would show in a less strictly regimented title. And, though I'd be lying if I said the music weren't a bit overbearing, there's also no denying the talents of the players in singing and playing instruments.
A rip-roaring tour de force and cinematic masterpiece this is not. But recognizing the approach here to film-making and storytelling, peculiar and idiosyncratic as it seems in 2022, I can't say the film isn't well-made for what it is. It's also well worth noting that the climax is really quite well done, unexpectedly invigorating as it presents. Now, any viewer who isn't greatly enamored of westerns, old Hollywood at large, or someone in the cast has no major reason to give this a try, and even for ardent cinephiles open-mindedness is a prerequisite. Yet if one is receptive to all the wide variety that decades of movie magic have to offer, then this is a fair way to pass one hour. Not the most absorbing and fulfilling picture, no - but 'Shine on, Harvest Moon' serves its intended purpose as a fun if kitschy slice of cinema, and that's good enough for me.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that, of course. However, to visit titles of this tenor, in this time frame, more than 80 years on, is an experience that's more than a little jarring. Then factor in the frequent inclusion of songs (if not also some dance), as was common to not just a lot of western films of the period but those of Roy Rogers specifically, and watching 'Shine on, Harvest Moon' becomes a slightly bewildering experience. It's not at all bad - it is enjoyable, truthfully - and I admire the work that all involved put into the feature. Moreover, while there's a lot of unconvincing acting on hand, this isn't to say that the cast is without any skill. Despite the ham-handed of the production, accentuating fundamental diversion over robust movie-going reward, at some points we do see some swell glimmers of range and nuance denoting the capabilities the actors would show in a less strictly regimented title. And, though I'd be lying if I said the music weren't a bit overbearing, there's also no denying the talents of the players in singing and playing instruments.
A rip-roaring tour de force and cinematic masterpiece this is not. But recognizing the approach here to film-making and storytelling, peculiar and idiosyncratic as it seems in 2022, I can't say the film isn't well-made for what it is. It's also well worth noting that the climax is really quite well done, unexpectedly invigorating as it presents. Now, any viewer who isn't greatly enamored of westerns, old Hollywood at large, or someone in the cast has no major reason to give this a try, and even for ardent cinephiles open-mindedness is a prerequisite. Yet if one is receptive to all the wide variety that decades of movie magic have to offer, then this is a fair way to pass one hour. Not the most absorbing and fulfilling picture, no - but 'Shine on, Harvest Moon' serves its intended purpose as a fun if kitschy slice of cinema, and that's good enough for me.
Shine On Harvest Moon, the popular standard made famous by Nora Bayes in vaudeville and the stage, serves as the title song for this early Roy Rogers western. In this film Roy and William Farnum are partners in a ranch in Wyomng that's been having hard times. They've got no cattle of their own, they're just renting out their land for other herds to feed on at the moment.
Farnum has a former partner played by Stanley Andrews who turned bad. Andrews plays Ed Jackson who has a pair of what look like inbred sons and has a valley hideout he calls the 'hole'.
Somebody's giving Andrews some inside information enabling his rustling operation to be always a step ahead of the law. Suspicion falls on Farnum. But you know Roy Rogers wouldn't partner with a crook, so he does some investigating on his home. Roy's spurred on by the fact that Farnum has pretty Lynne Roberts as a daughter who Roy kind of likes.
Shine On Harvest Moon is a pretty good B western, one of Roy's better early ones. And it was nice learning that Shine On Harvest Moon is also identified with another popular performer besides Nora Bayes.
And because I got curious I looked up Jackson Hole, Wyoming and no the area was not named for a famous outlaw hideout.
Farnum has a former partner played by Stanley Andrews who turned bad. Andrews plays Ed Jackson who has a pair of what look like inbred sons and has a valley hideout he calls the 'hole'.
Somebody's giving Andrews some inside information enabling his rustling operation to be always a step ahead of the law. Suspicion falls on Farnum. But you know Roy Rogers wouldn't partner with a crook, so he does some investigating on his home. Roy's spurred on by the fact that Farnum has pretty Lynne Roberts as a daughter who Roy kind of likes.
Shine On Harvest Moon is a pretty good B western, one of Roy's better early ones. And it was nice learning that Shine On Harvest Moon is also identified with another popular performer besides Nora Bayes.
And because I got curious I looked up Jackson Hole, Wyoming and no the area was not named for a famous outlaw hideout.
Cowboy movies and early television shows did more to shape the romantic American view of the old west than any history book, and this early Roy "King of the Cowboys" Rogers flick is a fine example. Interspersed with musical numbers, it's an anachronistic shoot-'em-up tale of cattle rustling and "heading 'em off at the pass." The title tune, sung on a hayride, is an American standard, and Lulu Belle (Myrtle Wiseman) singing "I'm dying to git a nice feller" is worth waiting for.
¿Sabías que…?
- ConexionesRemade as The Fighting Buckaroo (1943)
- Bandas sonorasThe Man in the Moon is a Cowhand
Written by Roy Rogers and Tim Spencer
Sung by Roy Rogers
Used again in Man from Rainbow Valley (1946)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución57 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the English language plot outline for Shine on Harvest Moon (1938)?
Responda