Acusado de homicidio

This is, though entertaining, far from a good movie. It comes across as a long television show. And no wonder! The director did mostly TV. At the time, star Richard Chamberlain was known primarily for his Dr. Kildare series.

The supporting cast is lots of fun. It runs the gamut from -- OK, ready? Pat Butram .... to Joey Heatherton ... to Claude Rains. Yes, in the middle of this tale of a poor low class kid (Nick Adams, suitably confused looking) caught in the midst of a class-conscious small Southern town, Rains is the patriarchal retired lawyer. Yes, Claude Rains.

He looks frail and certainly doesn't seem especially Southern. But here was a man who never turned in a bad performance.

Chamberlain is good, too, and Jeanette Nolan is touching as the wife of the man Adams is accused of murdering.

Always enjoy viewing this film mainly because Joey Heatherton's father was a mail man and delivered the mail to my home at the time in Nassau County, Long Island, New York. Richard Chamberland,(David Mitchell),"The Pavilion",'99, was a lawyer in this picture and wound up having to defend Joey Heatherton's (Laura Mae Brown), husband from a crime he was accused of performing on a police officer. The police officer was found not breathing in the bed in which Laura Mae shared herself. Laura is a very sexy hot to trot gal and performs all sorts of wild movements with her body in a bar next to a classic jukebox in the 1960's. Claude Rains,(Art Harper),"The Invisible Man",'33 makes a brief appearance and adds a good supporting role. This is a very entertaining film in Black and White and held my interest from beginning to the very end.

TV's Dr. Kildare, Richard Chamberlain, a huge matinée idol back in the '60s, was given "Twilight of Honor" by MGM to cash in on his popularity and make him into a movie star. To do that, they gave him excellent support in the form of Claude Rains, Nick Adams, James Gregory, Jeanette Nolan, Honor Blackman, and Pat Buttram. The result by today's standards isn't very hard-hitting, though it's certainly well acted. The film is directed by Boris Sagal, who did a lot of television, and as a movie, it isn't as good as "Anatomy of a Murder," from which the script is pretty much ripped off.

Chamberlain plays a young attorney and widower, David Mitchell who's assigned a rotten case, that of an unstable soldier accused of murdering one of the small New Mexico town heroes, and he's confessed - twice. The special prosecutor (Gregory) is hoping to sweep into political office with the case, and the judge sides with him through most of the trial. Mitchell turns to the distinguished attorney and his friend, Art Harper, who is ill but nonetheless is full of fire and gives Mitchell some guidance. The defense is a New Mexico law that allows a man to kill because of adultery, something the victim's widow (Jeanette Nolan) and his friends would like to keep quiet.

Joey Heatherton plays the slutty wife of Nick Adams, and she gives a very overt performance. Nick Adams, who would die of an overdose five years later, has a good role and does an excellent job; it earned him an Oscar nomination, and he allegedly spent over $8,000 advertising to win it. He lost to Melvyn Douglas. Jeanette Nolan is lovely and serene as the victim's wife. Claude Rains in one of his last films is marvelous. He looks unwell but his acting is wonderful. Richard Chamberlain even then had a strong enough talent to hold his own against the more experienced actors. As David, he's passionate and determined. Although in the last 46 years, he's had a decent film career, certainly it doesn't compare to his King of the Miniseries crown or some wonderful stage work, including Night of the Iguana and My Fair Lady, both of which I saw and loved. As a baby boomer, he has a special place in my heart.

This film was probably intended for the teen crowd, Chamberlain's fan base, which is why there's a lot of talk about sex but no real action.

OK courtroom drama from Perlberg-Seaton, with MGM capitalizing on Richard Chamberlain's TV success by casting him as a rather Kildare-like defense attorney. He's recently widowed, and he's given the unenviable job of defending sleazy-but-polite Nick Adams, who's already confessed, twice, to murdering Pat Buttram, a well-liked local politico who was trying to make time with Adams' sluttish wife, Joey Heatherton. Chamberlain's OK, and so are the courtroom exploits, with a screenplay that seems to delight in pushing the envelope a bit in terms of sexual conversation circa 1963. There's discussion of impotence, sleeping nude, and prostitution, and several sequences of Joey Heatherton twitching luridly next to a jukebox. But the best reason to watch is Claude Rains, as Chamberlain's former professor and current legal adviser. He looks genuinely unsteady and hasn't many good lines, but it's a beautiful, modest, underplayed performance. Joan Blackman is on hand as his daughter, to provide the rather tepid romantic interest, and Jeanette Nolan is good (when wasn't she) as Buttram's protective widow. The flashback format is unwieldy, and Boris Sagal directs it like it's a big TV show, but it keeps your interest pretty steadily, especially as a barometer of what was and wasn't permissible on screen in1963.

"Twilight of Honor" is a film with a rather mediocre overall score on IMDB of 6.3. Well, after seeing it, I cannot believe the film has such a rating, as it's a top-notch courtroom drama....and a film you'd likely appreciate.

This film is Richard Chamberlain's first starring role in a movie, though he'd done TV before this. He plays a young and very inexperienced lawyer who is set to defend a rather dim man for murder....and the town's atmosphere is definitely hostile towards him. On top of this, the state has brought in a cocky special prosecutor (James Gregory). All the young lawyer has is his idealism and some advice from his mentor (Claude Rains). Can he possibly get a light sentence or a verdict of not guilty with so many things working against him?

This is a very intelligent and well written drama...one that never was dull and managed to get the viewer to care about the dumb schnook on trial for his life. All in all, a nice little film well worth your time.