Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Special Bulletin

  • Película de TV
  • 1983
  • 1h 43min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
7.5/10
1.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Special Bulletin (1983)
Drama

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA TV reporter and cameraman are taken hostage on a tugboat while covering a workers strike. The demands of the hostage-takers are to collect all the nuclear detonators in the Charleston, SC ... Leer todoA TV reporter and cameraman are taken hostage on a tugboat while covering a workers strike. The demands of the hostage-takers are to collect all the nuclear detonators in the Charleston, SC area so they may be detonated at sea. They threaten to detonate a nuclear device of their ... Leer todoA TV reporter and cameraman are taken hostage on a tugboat while covering a workers strike. The demands of the hostage-takers are to collect all the nuclear detonators in the Charleston, SC area so they may be detonated at sea. They threaten to detonate a nuclear device of their own if their demand isn't met.

  • Dirección
    • Edward Zwick
  • Guionistas
    • Marshall Herskovitz
    • Edward Zwick
  • Elenco
    • Ed Flanders
    • Kathryn Walker
    • Roxanne Hart
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    7.5/10
    1.5 k
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Edward Zwick
    • Guionistas
      • Marshall Herskovitz
      • Edward Zwick
    • Elenco
      • Ed Flanders
      • Kathryn Walker
      • Roxanne Hart
    • 47Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 9Opiniones de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Ganó 4 premios Primetime Emmy
      • 8 premios ganados y 2 nominaciones en total

    Fotos5

    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel
    Ver el cartel

    Elenco principal64

    Editar
    Ed Flanders
    Ed Flanders
    • John Woodley
    Kathryn Walker
    Kathryn Walker
    • Susan Myles
    Roxanne Hart
    Roxanne Hart
    • Megan Barclay
    Christopher Allport
    Christopher Allport
    • Steven Levitt
    David Clennon
    David Clennon
    • Bruce Lyman
    David Rasche
    David Rasche
    • David McKeeson
    Rosalind Cash
    Rosalind Cash
    • Frieda Barton
    Ebbe Roe Smith
    Ebbe Roe Smith
    • Jim Seaver
    Roberta Maxwell
    Roberta Maxwell
    • Diane Silverman
    Mary Armstrong
    Bernard Behrens
    Bernard Behrens
    • Dr. Neils Johanssen
    Ivan Bonar
    Ivan Bonar
    Frank Dent
    • Dr. Jason Halpern
    Woody Eney
    Robert Fields
    Robert Fields
    Ron Frazier
    Ron Frazier
    • Robert Grafton
    Bruce French
    Bruce French
    Elizabeth Gill
    • Dirección
      • Edward Zwick
    • Guionistas
      • Marshall Herskovitz
      • Edward Zwick
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios47

    7.51.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    8ericrnolan

    A review of "Special Bulletin" (1983)

    There's a pretty damn interesting chestnut from from 80's-era nuclear nightmare films available on Youtube — 1983's "Special Bulletin." I was surprised I hadn't heard of it. I think most 80's kids remember ABC's "The Day After." That infamous television movie was a cultural touchstone that scared a generation of kids. "Special Bulletin" was produced by NBC the same year, actually preceding "The Day After" by nine months. Instead of a world-ending war with Russia, the feature-length special imagined a single incident of nuclear terrorism in Charleston, South Carolina. (I myself had no idea that Charleston was the strategic military nexus that the movie explains it to be.)

    "Special Bulletin" was filmed as a "War of the Worlds"-type narrative, consisting exclusively of faux news coverage, and it's pretty damned good. (It won a handful of Emmys.) It's just as frightening today — or maybe more so, given the increased threat of precisely this kind of terrorism from stateless groups.

    The acting is mostly good, the directing successfully captures the feel of live news coverage, and the absence of a musical score further lends the movie a sense of realism. The story has a few surprises for us, too — the plot setup is creative and interesting, and much more thought went in the the teleplay than I would have expected. The film asks some difficult questions about the role of the media in affecting the outcome of high-profile crimes like the one depicted. (Would such questions be more or less relevant in the age of camera-phones, uploaded ISIS executions and Facebook Live? I'm not sure.)

    I was also quite impressed with some of "Special Bulletin's" thriller elements. (I'd say more, but I will avoid spoilers.)

    One thing that detracts from the format's realism is the fact that some of this movie's actors are easily recognizable from other roles in the 80's (although it's fun spotting them as an 80's movie fan).

    Most viewers my age, for example, will recognize Ed Flanders and Lane Smith. The utterly sexy female reporter who arrives on location at Charleston Harbor is Roxanne Hart, who later played Brenda in "Highlander" (1986). (She's still quite beautiful, guys, and she's still making movies.) Most jarring of all, however, is a prominent role played by David Clennon, who any fan of horror- science fiction will recognize as Palmer from John Carpenter's 1982 masterpiece, "The Thing." This is still fun, though — he has that same disarrayed hair. Was it his trademark back in the day?
    8lrcdmnhd72

    Very realistic, believable and convincing.

    When I first saw this movie, I thought it was a legitimate news broadcast. This was due to the fact that, on my first viewing, I didn't watch it from the start. The TV station that I first watched it on broke away for commercials, just like a regular TV cable news channel would do. To me, this made it even more convincing. The close attention to detail and accuracy of news journalism format made this movie very powerful and frightening. I highly recommend this movie to Journalism majors and anybody who enjoys strong and powerful drama...
    JohnnyReb

    BROUGHT BACK MEMORIES OF WOTW

    I was in the studio of WMAR-TV the night this excellent "disaster" film was shown, due to the fact that the Management heard about our OTR Club and that we had WOTW in our collection. I was invited to watch the show and to compare it with the panic b/cast on the 11 o'clock news that followed.

    I told them it was very well done, and was very realistic. Had they not had the disclaimers on the screen it could have well been taken for the real thing. I told them if they would have cast real reporters in the major roles it would have added something to the show. Orson Welles used real names of NY based reporters for the broadcast of WOTW which really gave it that authentic feeling. And with the "Secretary Of State" sounding like Roosevelt was the icing on the cake.

    I pointed out that at the time Special Bulletin was aired the American public was not as gullible as they were in 1938.(We even played some clips of WOTW to compare it with Special Bulletin). We were on the brink of War and any program like that, would of course cause concern, which, unfortunately it did.

    Al in all this film was very well done and was more or less a tribute to Orson Welles and WOTW.

    JohnnyReb
    8David_Powell3006-1

    Fascinating - Why no video release?

    Very ahead-of-its-time story, tremendous commetary on the media and politics among other things. Someone else referred to modern day disaster coverage by the media and disaster response by the federal government, and boy do those both come into play here, amazing for a telefilm made in 1983.

    The dialogue was also pretty good, and if you look at some of the films that the writers/producers of this gem went on to make, definitely a lot of material there.

    Also some good performances from great actors, which is always a good thing, of course! Why was this never released on video? The original (and excellent) "Brian's Song" came out on DVD, so certainly a TV movie could be doable for DVD.

    "Countdown to Looking Glass" is another good one. IMO both of these are tons better than "The Day After" which I found cheesy even then. "Special Bulletin" almost has a surreal quality that is very hard to match.
    searchanddestroy-1

    Reality Show

    When I watched this wonderful TV movie, I rightaway thought of a novel : REALITY SHOW, written by Larry Beinhardt, a total different story but with the same kind of chilly topic, so real and creepy in the same kind, involving news and gruesome events, manipulation of the medias.... I also think that Sidney Lumet would have loved making such a film, even for TV. It is rather complex, unbelievable - but 9/11 was also unbelievable - gloomy. A pure masterpiece by the then young director Edward Zwick, who is so promising here. It would have been impossible to present it in movie theaters, it is a purely TV stuff. But aweome piece of work.

    Más como esto

    Countdown to Looking Glass
    6.9
    Countdown to Looking Glass
    Un día después
    7.0
    Un día después
    The Atomic Cafe
    7.6
    The Atomic Cafe
    Without Warning
    6.8
    Without Warning
    By Dawn's Early Light
    6.9
    By Dawn's Early Light
    Testament
    6.9
    Testament
    Against All Hope
    3.4
    Against All Hope
    Los perros de la plaga
    7.7
    Los perros de la plaga
    Llamadas tenebrosas
    5.4
    Llamadas tenebrosas
    Juego de terror
    6.1
    Juego de terror
    La hora final
    7.1
    La hora final
    Having It All
    5.3
    Having It All

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Trivia
      When this film was first broadcast, the network superimposed the word "dramatization" on the bottom of the screen every few minutes and ran disclaimers after every commercial break, to remind people it was only a movie. That didn't stop some people in Charleston, S.C. from panicking anyway.
    • Errores
      The cameraman would not be able to film the explosion. Either the pyroclastic storm or the electromagnetic pulse would render the camera unusable, and at least erase the magnetic tape in the camera.
    • Citas

      Susan Myles: Good evening, this is News Watch. Emergency efforts continue in Charleston, South Carolina, where 3 days ago a nuclear explosion destroyed the heart of the city. Estimated at an yield of 23,000 tons of TNT was seen and heard up to 400 miles away and created a firestorm that is still burning in several areas. Due to early evacuations, the number of dead is estimated at less than 2,000, but at last count there were more than 25,000 injured. Many of those are burnt and have been flown to hospitals around the country for treatment, but altogether the burn care centers in the United States have only 2,400 beds, less than half the number needed for the victims of the Charleston blast. Because onshore winds spreading radiation fallout west of the city, 250,000 more people have been evacuated from outlying areas. In all, half a million are homeless. Scientists estimate that it may be years before the region is safe to reoccupy. Trauma care centers are being set up for survivors, many of whom are physically uninjured but suffering from shock and delayed stress. Authorities are also caring for hundreds of children who are either orphaned or cannot find their parents. Counselors tell of recurring nightmares and shock. One child of 9 apparently committed suicide. After 3 days the shock seems to be just setting in. Early talk of rebuilding have been forgotten in the wake of radiation estimates. Hundreds of thousands of refugees face the prospects of starting new lives elsewhere in an already depressed economy. As for Charleston itself, the city of gardens and narrow streets and beautiful old houses, that city is gone forever. A new city may someday grow there years from now, or it may remain a desert, whichever, the staggering loss of once was can never be eradicated.

    • Créditos curiosos
      Opens with a commercial advertising shows for the fictional RBS network, followed by the title "Special Bulletin" as the commercial is interrupted. There are no opening credits, making this one of the first TV movies ever produced without some sort of opening credits.
    • Versiones alternativas
      The video release omits the "dramatization" on-screen disclaimer seen throughout the original TV broadcast. The DVD released through the Warner Archive Collection does contain the on-screen disclaimers.
    • Conexiones
      Featured in The 35th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards (1983)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 20 de marzo de 1983 (Estados Unidos)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • Boletín especial
    • Productoras
      • National Broadcasting Company (NBC)
      • Ohlmeyer Communications Company
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      • 1h 43min(103 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Mono
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.