Agrega una trama en tu idiomaShy young Cindy nervously explores her sexuality in the swingin' '60's, with the help of her step-sister Donna.Shy young Cindy nervously explores her sexuality in the swingin' '60's, with the help of her step-sister Donna.Shy young Cindy nervously explores her sexuality in the swingin' '60's, with the help of her step-sister Donna.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Alice Friedland
- Alice
- (sin créditos)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Who's the "hooker" dancing naked in the bar near the beginning of the movie, the one the father has an affair with? She's not in the credits on the movie, and not on IMDb either. She is smoking hot, and it's a shame there's no credit of her! We just saw this movie and it's pretty okay, i think the story and morals are about on point for today, although they slightly play up that pot makes girls explore each other. Is that really so bad of a thing? Anyway, the girl dancing who has the romps with the father is definitely a highlight of the film, for 1970, she really has it going on! Anyone know who she is, or can recognize her from any other early, or later, movie? The compilation we bought has 8 films on it, and this is one of them.
The Crown-International sexploitation movie "Cindy and Donna" seems to have drifted into obscurity immediately after its theatrical release, not getting a release on VHS and only receiving a quiet DVD release a few years ago (as one movie in a pack of several.) This may have been because there are no famous stars in the cast, or it may have been because the movie was rated "X" - though it's a soft core "X" and not a hard core "X", "X" rated movies have had a hard time being released in the home video market. But there's a real obvious reason why the movie has remained obscure, and that's because it's an incredibly awful movie. There is no real plot on display here - it's just one soft core sex sequence after another with just flimsy connections with each other. While I know this may sound appealing to some horny viewers, I think even they will be quickly bored, because these sequences are not erotic and are instead incredibly boring. The only interesting thing about the sex scenes is that they carefully avoid showing lower frontal nudity - if the filmmakers wanted an "X" rating, why not show everything? Anyway, this is one obscurity that deserves its status.
This is a fascinating film that goes well beyond typical sexploitation. I have so many questions...
I want to know what happened to the actress that played Cindy. I think she is/was (?) uniquely beautiful and was great in this budgetless film.
Did the director (or anyone else) notice that Sue Allen (the mom) was strung out, had at least one black eye, and had sex bruises all over her thighs? If so, was this an example of excellent casting or of irresponsible film making?
Why was Alice Friedland uncredited? This was a big role. The director was obviously obsessed with her, as evidenced by her large role and the lengthy dance routine at the bar. And, why was she so sweaty/oily in the dance scene? The scene was so long, and she was so oily...
How was it ever acceptable, in a theatrical release, to depict 15 and 17 year old girls stripping in bars, smoking weed, and hookin'? This was a drive-in feature. Other reviewers talked about their parents taking them to see this film by mistake. Can you imagine that? Holy ****. I'm not complaining - I think this movie is awesome. I'm just sayin'...
As for the ending, my question is wtf? Seriously... wtf? Brilliant. Amazing.
This film will hold your attention for 90 minutes. A unique and shocking sexploitation film that is worth watching.
RealReview Posting Scoring Criteria: Acting - 1/1; Casting - 1/1; Directing - 0.5/1; Story - 1/1; Writing/Screenplay - 1/1;
Total Base Score = 4.5
Modifiers (+ or -): Originality: 1;
Music Score/Soundtrack: 0.5 (After finishing the film, watch the intro credits again and think about the lyrics to that song. Awesome.);
Gratuitous Female Nudity: 1 (I just love awarding a full point in this category. Plenty of interesting female nudity in this film, about every 10 minutes or so.);
Distractingly Poor Editing: -1 (Multiple sex scenes turn into a naked woman rolling around on top of a man wearing shorts. None of the camera angles produced anything that resembled intercourse. Eventually, softcore directors learned how to better fake the sex scenes.);
Total RealReview Rating: 6 (This is a very high rating for a sexploitation film. Kudos to the creators and all of the missing actresses.)
I want to know what happened to the actress that played Cindy. I think she is/was (?) uniquely beautiful and was great in this budgetless film.
Did the director (or anyone else) notice that Sue Allen (the mom) was strung out, had at least one black eye, and had sex bruises all over her thighs? If so, was this an example of excellent casting or of irresponsible film making?
Why was Alice Friedland uncredited? This was a big role. The director was obviously obsessed with her, as evidenced by her large role and the lengthy dance routine at the bar. And, why was she so sweaty/oily in the dance scene? The scene was so long, and she was so oily...
How was it ever acceptable, in a theatrical release, to depict 15 and 17 year old girls stripping in bars, smoking weed, and hookin'? This was a drive-in feature. Other reviewers talked about their parents taking them to see this film by mistake. Can you imagine that? Holy ****. I'm not complaining - I think this movie is awesome. I'm just sayin'...
As for the ending, my question is wtf? Seriously... wtf? Brilliant. Amazing.
This film will hold your attention for 90 minutes. A unique and shocking sexploitation film that is worth watching.
RealReview Posting Scoring Criteria: Acting - 1/1; Casting - 1/1; Directing - 0.5/1; Story - 1/1; Writing/Screenplay - 1/1;
Total Base Score = 4.5
Modifiers (+ or -): Originality: 1;
Music Score/Soundtrack: 0.5 (After finishing the film, watch the intro credits again and think about the lyrics to that song. Awesome.);
Gratuitous Female Nudity: 1 (I just love awarding a full point in this category. Plenty of interesting female nudity in this film, about every 10 minutes or so.);
Distractingly Poor Editing: -1 (Multiple sex scenes turn into a naked woman rolling around on top of a man wearing shorts. None of the camera angles produced anything that resembled intercourse. Eventually, softcore directors learned how to better fake the sex scenes.);
Total RealReview Rating: 6 (This is a very high rating for a sexploitation film. Kudos to the creators and all of the missing actresses.)
If all you're looking for out of a movie is sex, sex, and more sex, then you might want to give the Crown International exploitation flick "Cindy and Donna" a try. It's not for people who want a really good, meaty story or lots of character development. However, it *is* for those who want to see a plethora of bare breasts, close-ups of bottoms and crotches, and a number of erotic sex scenes.
Aptly described as the saga of one teenagers' sexual awakening, it stars Debbie Osborne as the Cindy of the title, a 17 year old who doesn't have much interest in sex yet, despite the fact that her horny older sister Donna (Nancy Ison) and equally horny friend Karen (Cheryl Powell) are having it all the time. Their mother Harriet (Sue Allen) is a drunk who's saddled with a husband, Ted (Max Manning) who continuously lusts after a topless dancer named Alice (Alice Friedland). And Donna has a boyfriend, Greg (Tom Benko) who's more than a little sleazy.
While this isn't much good as a film, it's just so damn trashy that it's likely to keep a good many voyeurs watching, despite the rather slow pace. None of the acting is exactly award worthy, but it gets the job done. Osborne is reasonably appealing as Cindy. Manning is an entertaining shameless horndog and Allen chews a little scenery as the drunken mother, whose own attempt to engage in some extramarital activity doesn't go too well. Adding to the enjoyment factor are an assortment of truly cheesy pop tunes and a variable soundtrack ranging from bluegrass to rock sounds.
Overall, some devotees of 70s drive-in cult cinema should be fairly satisfied with this one.
Six out of 10.
Aptly described as the saga of one teenagers' sexual awakening, it stars Debbie Osborne as the Cindy of the title, a 17 year old who doesn't have much interest in sex yet, despite the fact that her horny older sister Donna (Nancy Ison) and equally horny friend Karen (Cheryl Powell) are having it all the time. Their mother Harriet (Sue Allen) is a drunk who's saddled with a husband, Ted (Max Manning) who continuously lusts after a topless dancer named Alice (Alice Friedland). And Donna has a boyfriend, Greg (Tom Benko) who's more than a little sleazy.
While this isn't much good as a film, it's just so damn trashy that it's likely to keep a good many voyeurs watching, despite the rather slow pace. None of the acting is exactly award worthy, but it gets the job done. Osborne is reasonably appealing as Cindy. Manning is an entertaining shameless horndog and Allen chews a little scenery as the drunken mother, whose own attempt to engage in some extramarital activity doesn't go too well. Adding to the enjoyment factor are an assortment of truly cheesy pop tunes and a variable soundtrack ranging from bluegrass to rock sounds.
Overall, some devotees of 70s drive-in cult cinema should be fairly satisfied with this one.
Six out of 10.
A teenage virgin, Cindy, is curious about SEX. She watches her older half-sister Donna have SEX with her boyfriend in his car, and then she has SEX with herself afterwards. Meanwhile her father is busy having a lot of SEX with a nubile stripper/prostitute, which doesn't stop him from staggering home in a drunken stupor and having SEX with Donna (his own step-daughter)while Cindy spies on them. Cindy responds to this by going to the beach with her more experienced best friend where they pick up two boys. Her friend has SEX with one of the boys, while Cindy almost has SEX with the other. Later they return back to her house (her parents have gone away to Vegas) where they smoke a joint and end up having lesbian SEX with each other. Meanwhile, sister Donna poses for nude photographs for her boyfriend's friends and has SEX with all three of them. And then finally Cindy at long last has SEX with a guy.
You get the idea that this movie has a lot of sex in it. In fact, it kind of suffers the "curse of too much sex", a problem afflicting almost all hardcore sex films and many softcore films like this: There is so much sex in this movie that it pretty much crowds out anything else of interest (i.e. plot, character development, basic production values). So unless you are a young, heterosexual male who is planning to spend 90 some minutes masturbating, I really can't recommend this. It does have some sicko 70's elements (for instance, the quasi-incest), which will probably offend the sensibilities of some, but for me there is not nearly enough of this since it at least makes the movie less boring. There is also some attempted "comedy relief" by the two drunken parents, but they are mostly just annoying.
The only possible saving grace of this movie is that the four actresses who play the young people (the two sisters, the friend, and the father's mistress) are all very attractive, which isn't always a given in 70's films (70's porn actresses were often pimply and corpulent and generally looked like they'd been picked up in a Times Square vice dragnet). The four girls are obviously all somewhat older than the "teenage" characters they play, but they all have a nubile girl-next-door freshness without the freakishly huge breasts or the unnatural Russ Meyeresque proportions (not to metion the silicone Frankenstein look so common in these kind of movies today). This is still no reason for anybody but a hairy-palmed sex fiend to watch this movie, of course, but it should make it a little more fun at least for those who fall into that category.
You get the idea that this movie has a lot of sex in it. In fact, it kind of suffers the "curse of too much sex", a problem afflicting almost all hardcore sex films and many softcore films like this: There is so much sex in this movie that it pretty much crowds out anything else of interest (i.e. plot, character development, basic production values). So unless you are a young, heterosexual male who is planning to spend 90 some minutes masturbating, I really can't recommend this. It does have some sicko 70's elements (for instance, the quasi-incest), which will probably offend the sensibilities of some, but for me there is not nearly enough of this since it at least makes the movie less boring. There is also some attempted "comedy relief" by the two drunken parents, but they are mostly just annoying.
The only possible saving grace of this movie is that the four actresses who play the young people (the two sisters, the friend, and the father's mistress) are all very attractive, which isn't always a given in 70's films (70's porn actresses were often pimply and corpulent and generally looked like they'd been picked up in a Times Square vice dragnet). The four girls are obviously all somewhat older than the "teenage" characters they play, but they all have a nubile girl-next-door freshness without the freakishly huge breasts or the unnatural Russ Meyeresque proportions (not to metion the silicone Frankenstein look so common in these kind of movies today). This is still no reason for anybody but a hairy-palmed sex fiend to watch this movie, of course, but it should make it a little more fun at least for those who fall into that category.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThis film is notable for its involvement a United States Supreme Court case, Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U.S. 496 (1973). At the conclusion of a showing at a drive-in theater in that state, a county sheriff arrested theater manager Harry Roaden for exhibiting obscene material in violation of state law, seizing several reels of the film as evidence. After Roaden's conviction, his lawyers asserted that the film's seizure without a warrant violated the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and thus the reels should not have been admissible as evidence. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately agreed that a warrant should have been obtained, as no exigency forced the sheriff to immediately seize a film being exhibited at a commercial theater with regularly scheduled performances--circumstances that afforded ample opportunity to conduct proper judicial review and obtain a warrant.
Roaden's lawyers never seriously contested his conviction on the basis of the film's content, effectively conceding that the film met the standard for obscenity under Kentucky law.
- ErroresIn the first scene of Ted ogling a woman driver next to him, it's obvious that his vantage point would not allow him to see the car's driver so clearly.
- ConexionesFeatured in Twisted Sex Vol. 15 (1996)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Nackte Engel sind gefährlich
- Locaciones de filmación
- 8589 Pearlblossom Hwy, Littlerock, California, Estados Unidos(husband and wife drive by Vern's garage and stop to make phone call)
- Productora
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Cindy and Donna (1970) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda