Calendario de lanzamientosTop 250 películasPelículas más popularesBuscar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y entradasNoticias sobre películasPelículas de la India destacadas
    Programas de televisión y streamingLas 250 mejores seriesSeries más popularesBuscar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    Qué verÚltimos trailersTítulos originales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterInformación sobre premiosInformación sobre festivalesTodos los eventos
    Nacidos un día como hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias sobre celebridades
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de visualización
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar app
  • Elenco y equipo
  • Opiniones de usuarios
IMDbPro

After Amy

  • Película de TV
  • 2001
  • PG-13
  • 1h 31min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.1/10
320
TU CALIFICACIÓN
After Amy (2001)
DramaSci-Fi

Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA reporter gets the scoop on the first-ever human cloning, but the furor surrounding the event jeopardizes the baby's birth and the career of the doctor responsible for creating the clone.A reporter gets the scoop on the first-ever human cloning, but the furor surrounding the event jeopardizes the baby's birth and the career of the doctor responsible for creating the clone.A reporter gets the scoop on the first-ever human cloning, but the furor surrounding the event jeopardizes the baby's birth and the career of the doctor responsible for creating the clone.

  • Dirección
    • Peter Werner
  • Guionistas
    • Richard Kadrey
    • Richard Kletter
  • Elenco
    • Bridget Fonda
    • Mary Beth Hurt
    • Valerie Mahaffey
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
    5.1/10
    320
    TU CALIFICACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Peter Werner
    • Guionistas
      • Richard Kadrey
      • Richard Kletter
    • Elenco
      • Bridget Fonda
      • Mary Beth Hurt
      • Valerie Mahaffey
    • 9Opiniones de los usuarios
    • 1Opinión de los críticos
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
  • Ver la información de producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 1 nominación en total

    Fotos

    Elenco principal35

    Editar
    Bridget Fonda
    Bridget Fonda
    • Linda Sanclair
    Mary Beth Hurt
    Mary Beth Hurt
    • Dr. Amanda Gordon
    Valerie Mahaffey
    Valerie Mahaffey
    • Virginia Hytner
    Philip Bosco
    Philip Bosco
    • Dr. Ed Walden
    Adam LeFevre
    Adam LeFevre
    • Chris Hytner
    • (as Adam Le Fevre)
    Arnold Pinnock
    Arnold Pinnock
    • Jimmy Wilmington
    Ron Lea
    Ron Lea
    • Matthew Gordon
    Ted Whittall
    Ted Whittall
    • Dr Stuart Mcelroy
    Bruce Dinsmore
    Bruce Dinsmore
    • Robert Rutger
    Vlasta Vrana
    Vlasta Vrana
    • Dr Dennis Griffiths
    Claudia Ferri
    Claudia Ferri
    • Nurse Donovan
    Bill Haugland
    • Dan Reilly
    Alan Fawcett
    • FBI Agent Olman
    Norman Mikeal Berketa
    • Michael O'Donnell
    • (as Norman Berketa)
    Benz Antoine
    Benz Antoine
    • Judge Watson
    Dorothée Berryman
    Dorothée Berryman
    • Dr. Friedlander
    Eric Goulem
    • Dr. Crowley
    Daniel Richard Giverin
    • Dr. Graham
    • Dirección
      • Peter Werner
    • Guionistas
      • Richard Kadrey
      • Richard Kletter
    • Todo el elenco y el equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Opiniones de usuarios9

    5.1320
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Opiniones destacadas

    10themillion

    Nice To Debate...

    The real title shown in Lifetime TV is 'One Particular Baby' or something like that.

    Bridget Fonda is just great as the journalist who has the exclusive story of the first clone baby. The Doctor who actually gets through the first clone, looks like 'Weakest Link' hostess, but never says 'Goodbye' in any part of the movie.

    The movie shows all the process, from the first steps of the cloning, throughout the pregnancy and the baby born (even showing the first anniversary of such news coming out).

    It actually shows the reality that could come out of something like a baby clone, from the human point of view of a mother who lost her daughter and wants another baby looking just like the one she lost.

    The problem is that the movie stands the not so objective side and tries to suggest that cloning is OK, when that is something being banned not only in USA or the World. So... it gives you the opportunity to disagree and hope that nobody follows such example without showing the bad that could come out of it (like the bad sheeps that came out BEFORE the first GOOD clone one), but I guess that would be 'another movie'.
    afijamesy2k

    One word key to this tv movie: DREADFUL.

    Yet another tv movie, about cloning, and yet a bad one if that, it stars Bridget Fonda in the rollin, rollin, rollin, rollin, rollin, type performance as the reporter who's women's fetus is a clone , stupid teleplay and a three word line that I Have never seen in the history of tv movies " that beats limp bizkit", which had should have been called My ordinary bizkit, instead of this dreary dull wreck, if only fred durst would have starred in the tv movie instead of this, this tv movie is about as bad as the band.

    My Ordinary baby aka" After Amy

    Rating: * Star
    temoginvampireslayer

    Thought provoking TV Movie

    While some may say that this is just an ordinary tv movie, I must concede a point, they are correct but that is not the whole story. What you may fail to realise is the ethical questions raised by the cloning of a human being. The movie addresses quite few issues that seem as relevant today as when the movie is set. Press invasion is nicely treated and the fame hungry Bridget Fonda's character goes through somewhat of a change. She goes from a cold-hearted glory-hungry monster to ethical reporter (I will not spoil the ending). Next we see a much more sympathetic depiction of the doctors involved and the research they use and the reasons they do what they do. What is most interesting is the ethical questions that you ask yourself. Would you do the same thing if it was your only avenue for having a child? Put yourself in their shoes then try and tell me you would not.
    2vnssyndrome89

    Boring piece of pro-cloning & anti-journalism propaganda...

    NO ORDINARY BABY (TV movie 2001) 2.5 out of 10 stars Time to Read: 2:45min

    BASIC PLOT: Dr. Amanda Gordon (Mary Beth Hurt) is a fertility specialist, who, with the help of her partner, Dr. Ed Walden (Philip Bosco) have just successfully cloned the first human being. The parents, Chris & Virginia Hytner (Adam LeFevre Valerie Mahaffey) wanted a clone of their dead child, tragically killed in a accident.

    Chris was driving the car when the accident occurred, and feels guilty, both about his child's death, and his wife's grief. It seems perfectly fine to both of them to just replace the child they lost, even though Dr. Gordon repeatedly tells them this will be a separate individual.

    A nurse in Dr. Gordon's clinic, Ms. Donovan (Claudia Ferri), disagrees with cloning, and gives the Hytner's medical files to an investigative journalist, Linda Sanclair (Bridget Fonda).

    Linda breaks the story to much fanfare, but is she doing the right thing? What will be the consequences to Dr. Gordon's and Dr. Walden's careers? And the most important question of all, will little Amy be born healthy and happy?

    WHAT WORKS: *IF YOU ARE PRO-CLONING, THIS MOVIE WILL WORK FOR YOU It is a pro-cloning, press bashing, piece of propaganda. However, if you aren't a fan of cloning, and if you think true investigative journalism has a place in our society, you'll find this movie offensive. They set Dr. Gordon up to be a renegade hero, and the parents of the cloned child are regarded as visionaries. I am not religious, so my objections are more personal. I understand grief, I've lived with it for a long time. But bringing someone who has died back by cloning, will not help you through your loss. The clone will have different experiences from conception, through adulthood. IT WILL NOT BE THE SAME PERSON! So, what exactly is the point then? To spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to have a child that looks like the one you lost? Wouldn't it be more advantageous to spend the huge amounts of money you'd shell out on cloning, to make a better world for your child? Isn't it the very definition of hubris to think your genes are "special"? To quote another movie, "Your are not a beautiful and unique snowflake!"

    WHAT DOESN'T WORK: *THE SCRIPT IS A SANCTIMONIOUS SERMON FROM START TO FINISH I don't know how Richard Kletter adapted Richard Kadrey's original short story, but the outcome is NOT GOOD. It's just a bunch of self-serving, moralistic clap-trap, that's not even entertaining.

    *THE REPORTER IS CONSTANTLY MADE TO LOOK LIKE A VILLAIN FOR DOING HER JOB Linda Sanclair (Bridget Fonda), the investigative journalist, is again and again made to look like scum for following a story about the first human clone. Isn't that her function in our society?

    *DR. GORDON & DR. WALDEN PURPORT THEMSELVES TO BE HEROES OF THE SCIENTIFIC WORLD But at the same time, they acknowledge they have no idea how a human clone will turn out. Doesn't that make them Dr. Frankensteins, instead of the Nobel Prize winners they claim to be?

    *BOTH THE PARENTS & DOCTORS PERPETRATE A CRUEL HOAX ON THE JOURNALIST but we're supposed to be ok with their actions on that count too.

    *REPORTERS AREN'T ALLOWED ON YOUR PROPERTY Dr. Gordon is mobbed outside her house, with reporters following her to her door. This wouldn't happen, they would be arrested for trespassing. They have to stay on the street, or the public sidewalk.

    *THIS MOVIE HAS PACING PROBLEMS At about the 30min mark, this movie begins to have problems. It starts rehashing events, slows to a crawl, and there's no real movement of the story forward. I know this is more of a character study, and it's trying to explore the issues of cloning, but you have to make it interesting either way.

    TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: *After watching the whole thing, I can't recommend this movie. Not only do I think it's propaganda (for cloning, and against journalism), but it's not even entertaining. There wasn't one character I cared about, or empathized with, except for Dr. Gordon's son, and he's only on the screen a total of 4 minutes. The script was terrible, and should never have been greenlighted. It's a waste of good actresses like Bridget Fonda and Mary Beth Hurt. However, I can't even recommend this film to their fans. It's a convoluted, smug, moralizing piece of detritus, that never should have made it off the page, and onto the small screen.

    CLOSING NOTES: *This is a made-for-tv movie, please keep that in mind before you watch/rate it. TV movies have a much lower budget, and so your expectations should be adjusted.

    *I have no connection to the film, or production in ANY way. This review was NOT written in full, or in part, by a bot. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews (less trolls and fanboys), and better entertainment. Hope I helped you out.
    9spj-4

    no ordinary baby ... & no ordinary movie

    I watched this movie as entitled "No Ordinary Baby", in Australia.

    I was tempted to turn off it straight away, as this midday movie, seemed to be presenting a pathetic uninteresting drama whose subject was unappealing to me. But gradually I chose to involve myself, & soon found it was raising MANY issues relevant to our modern society that the media prefers to snowball into greater injustice!

    Nor was I sympathetic to the doctor & his devoted nurse, as against the young staff member who presents herself devoutly committed to the cause, but seems to quickly fade in her significance. The nurse, compassionate to her family, yet daring to care more broadly, seems to become a criminal, in broader eyes of deception that her family & friends struggle to be more than bewildered & frustrated by!

    Earlier on, this nurse is noted to be deleting computer files, suspiciously! In her turn, the journalist breaking the story, seeks to reconcile herself with her failed sense of infallibility, & sees shades of grey in her emerging dilemmas! Her confessions to her companion are a stark contrast to the bold pronouncements she continues to make in public media presentations, impressively presented!

    I thought I would have liked her, this journalist researching & breaking stories! But I didn't think I would have ever liked the nurse! But she was building into her role of frustrated & toughly imprisoned victim, who might have been adjudged in contempt of court, but was growing into her stature of a media celebrity she was not accustomed to, but daring to nonetheless further the rights of her clients! And those beyond!

    While the journalist has her emerging dilemmas coming from within. Like partners yet enemies, in a devolving zone of instability that seems to be much less, for their individual contributions! I think this is a great movie! I haven't even addressed the rights & perspectives of the mother & father, let alone, of the precarious situation of the emerging baby!

    Each display their own WORTHINESS of contribution in turn & in time!

    Each dare to be courageous in their individual & personal decisions!!!

    Look at the father's justified sense of frustration! Look at the mother's tolerance of pain & yet quiet wisdom amidst the furore about her! Look into the eyes of the innocent victim! And still more emerges of mother & father & child, as if in a manger, & bewildered to be there! Imprisons in the modern era, have many boundaries! Look too at a steadfast doctor, & a compassionate nurse & her son & her husband, & a judgemental sensational broader media fury! So confronting & yet so real! As if straight out of Lindy Chamberlain & dingo folklore of contrivance, as presented in, "Through My Eyes", or too in Douglas Woods' journalistic masterpiece exposed in "Cry Freedom" in Nelson Mandela's unlikely escape into freedom! It's all here, in a drama of CRISES we should not react against, but embrace!

    Only love is its ultimate conqueror!

    But which one will find a salvation in this earthquake zone of uncertainty? I saw what I saw! It's your turn to judge, & see what you might see.

    But try to go at this with an open-mind, not blinded by posters & flashes of media hype! You will find much of merit here, if you decide not to be bedazzled by flash bulks, that die as quickly as they are clicked into existence!

    Más como esto

    The Whole Shebang
    5.7
    The Whole Shebang
    Finding Graceland
    6.4
    Finding Graceland
    Break Up
    5.0
    Break Up
    El cielo no puede esperar
    5.7
    El cielo no puede esperar
    Rough Magic
    5.4
    Rough Magic
    Out of the Rain
    4.8
    Out of the Rain
    South of Heaven, West of Hell
    4.3
    South of Heaven, West of Hell
    Cuero negro
    4.4
    Cuero negro
    Camilla
    6.0
    Camilla
    The Chris Isaak Show
    7.9
    The Chris Isaak Show
    El Beso Del Dragón
    6.6
    El Beso Del Dragón
    Mr. Jealousy
    6.3
    Mr. Jealousy

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que…?

    Editar
    • Errores
      In the opening credits, teleplay is misspelled as "telepaly".
    • Conexiones
      Featured in The 59th Annual Golden Globe Awards (2002)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 8 de octubre de 2001 (Estados Unidos)
    • Países de origen
      • Canadá
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • También se conoce como
      • No Ordinary Baby
    • Productoras
      • Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC)
      • Haft Entertainment
      • Von Zerneck-Sertner Films
    • Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Tiempo de ejecución
      1 hora 31 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Stereo
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 1.33 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
    After Amy (2001)
    Principales brechas de datos
    What is the Spanish language plot outline for After Amy (2001)?
    Responda
    • Ver más datos faltantes
    • Obtén más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más para explorar

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Inicia sesión para obtener más accesoInicia sesión para obtener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación de IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Publicidad
    • Trabaja con nosotros
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una compañía de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.