Kevin, Sam y Rob son miembros fundadores de un grupo teórico que lleva a cabo atracos. Leo, un gángster, los chantajea para que perpetren un verdadero atraco multimillonario. Ahora depende d... Leer todoKevin, Sam y Rob son miembros fundadores de un grupo teórico que lleva a cabo atracos. Leo, un gángster, los chantajea para que perpetren un verdadero atraco multimillonario. Ahora depende de ellos salir con vida.Kevin, Sam y Rob son miembros fundadores de un grupo teórico que lleva a cabo atracos. Leo, un gángster, los chantajea para que perpetren un verdadero atraco multimillonario. Ahora depende de ellos salir con vida.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Kristin Booth as the female lead has charm and presence. Her smile lights up the screen and she looks capable of the part played by her character, with a well muscled build unlike the typical stick woman of Hollywood.
David Suchet, who you may remember as the cop in A Perfect Murder, underplays the villain well though the other leads struggle more with the wooden dialogue.
A diverting way to spend some time. Certainly better than The Score, which wasted a huge budget and big name actors. Here, a modest budget and working talent exceed expectations.
But I was surprised. Although it wasn't the most techno-savvy heist movie with the coolest gadgets and up-to-the-minute technology, it had me entertained. That's not to say that there weren't gadgets and neat props used to pull of the heists - just not a plethora of things like you would see in a huge budget Hollywood movie. The parts in the movie that were supposed to be funny made me laugh and the tense parts had me going.
The setup, a trio of twenty-something friends making a game out of planning the perfect crime without actually any intention of pulling them off, was at least a refreshing start to a caper movie. They are not looking to score diamonds and make it rich - they are satisfied with knowing that they outsmarted the security companies and that they could pull off these jobs if they didn't have morals and a respect for the law (they are just desk-jockies).
I thought that the acting was well-done and the roles were believable. The script was pretty good and at least there wasn't a bunch of cheesy one-liners and awkward dialogue (although I too found that they said "foolproof" more times than warranted).
All in all I would have no problem recommending this to anyone. As long as you don't go into the theatre expecting the smartest, savvy-est, most original heist movie ever to grace the screen, then you'll most likely enjoy it for the 'popcorn movie' that it is.
With such a plot one takes into account a certain level of disbelief and far fetched events but this movie however takes the level just a bit too far. For example, no time is spent on telling how the characters get their extensive knowledge of almost all high tech alarms and a simple picture is enough for them to crack any system. Furthermore these people.. all very young and only one of them seems to have a job have all the latest gadgets available to them... 007 would envy their setup.
Even if one takes this as part of the popcorn this movie is - which I didn't- there are more disturbing factors.
Like the female lead who is about as convincing as Halle Berry in Catwoman with her "I am gonna kick his ass" attitude. For pure torture rewind the first time she confronts the body guard of the bad guy.. this is so painfully bad it hurts. The bad guy never got caught - at least so is told to us- for someone who never got caught he acts stupid the whole movie , some guys must have a lot of luck. No wonder David Suchet looks embarrassed the whole movie.
The "climax" itself has a nice idea behind it - story of this movie, lots of nice ideas- but the execution makes you shake your head in disbelief. The few twists that are behind it make entrapment a masterpiece.
Actually this whole movie feels like an under budget TV pilot. If this is the best Canada has to offer mainstream nowadays I even start to think about re-watching 21 jump street.
This film is even lower as the nobrainer it is made to be, it doesn't show any respect for its audience and takes itself far too serious. If you have anything better to do with your life.. watching paint dry.. clip your toenails please do it and avoid this stinker.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIn August 2020, Ryan Reynolds debuted a movie streaming service called Mint Mobile+, which only streams the movie Foolproof. The service has various categories, but all of them only contain the one movie with different posters.
- ErroresLeo gives Sam his gun in the basement. She aims at him. Then he says he would never give her a loaded weapon and tells her he took out the magazine. But when Sam puts the mag in and loads the gun (pulling back the slide) you can clearly see a bullet flying out of the shell ejection. So that means there was a bullet in the barrel all along and she wouldn't have needed the mag at all which tells us that Leo is not a professional or more likely that the crew screwed it up.
- Citas
Leo Gillette: I believe this is yours.
[holds up Sam's diary containing a record of their planned heists]
Leo Gillette: It's an impressive read: bold, yet meticulous strategies. I love the one where you tried to figure out how to pinch the Stanley Cup. It's very... Canadian.
- ConexionesReferenced in Trailer Park Boys: The Movie (2006)
- Bandas sonorasI Want You
Performed by Danko Jones
Written by Danko Jones
Published by Danko Jones (SOCAN)
Used under permission from Danko Jones Records and Universal Music Canada Inc.
Selecciones populares
- How long is Foolproof?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- CAD 8,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 458,990
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 230,312
- 5 oct 2003
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 779,036
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 34min(94 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1