Un lord escocés es convencido por un trío de brujas de que se convertirá en el próximo rey de Escocia, y respaldado por su esposa, tiene planes para hacerse con el poder.Un lord escocés es convencido por un trío de brujas de que se convertirá en el próximo rey de Escocia, y respaldado por su esposa, tiene planes para hacerse con el poder.Un lord escocés es convencido por un trío de brujas de que se convertirá en el próximo rey de Escocia, y respaldado por su esposa, tiene planes para hacerse con el poder.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Nominado a 3 premios Óscar
- 20 premios ganados y 115 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The acting is superb all around, but it's Kathryn Hunter, playing a variety of characters throughout, including all three witches, who walks away with the movie. I was slightly disappointed with Frances McDormand as Lady Macbeth. It's not that she's bad, it's just that this is such a juicy role and I felt like an actress as formidable as McDormand could make something truly memorable out of it, but instead it's a serviceable but uninspired interpretation. If you want a really memorable version of the Lady Macbeth character, take a look at Isuzu Yamada's take on it in Akira Kurosawa's "Throne of Blood." That performance will make your hair stand on end.
One of the things I never like about Shakespeare adaptations is that they always feel so stage bound and insular, no matter how much writers and directors try to make them fit a cinematic medium. "The Tragedy of Macbeth" also feels stage bound and insular, but since Coen decides to film it in a way that enhances its artificiality rather than try to compensate for it, I enjoyed it much more.
Grade: A-
Also the actors all acting with their emotions on 11, with it all being depressing seems to draw praises and Oscars like the best of baits. Never mind the dreary, long and uninspired monologues (or dialogues if "lucky").
Doesnt anyone have any original ideas anymore? Cant you portray Macbeth in a new, original light and add something new to it, shape it into a form(format we havent seen yet, make it appealing to newer and/or younger audiences. Make it entertaining, informative, moral and multilayered.
Always making these dark, minimalistic and overboard in every aspects productions has gotten beyond boring, bland and a work to get through.
Cinema should be inviting, exploring, adventerous, imaginative, new... This is NOT that, not by a long shot, it is a deja-vu of numerous productions past.
Denzel and Frances are masters in their own right. While their performances as the Macbeths may not be as striking as Hunter's, they nonetheless make for a very good pair to carry this film's weight, and each bring a grounded freshness to their lines. One thing I really appreciate was that they didn't "rise themselves up" to the weight of these characters, but rather brought the characters down to them. Instead of expanding their presence to fill the shoes of giants, they let the words filter through them with the coolness of their own natural presence. I could see and hear Denzel and Frances adopt the text in their own cadence/mannerisms, and (to quote another Shakespeare play) "acquire and beget a temperance that may give it smoothness."
Finally, Joel's vision really makes this adaptation stand out. Its aesthetic is a clever blend of film and theatre, employing the intimacy of one with the uncanny semblance of the other. Not only does this effect serve the presence of ghosts and witches well, but it gives the whole piece an almost dream-like quality that draws you in like the air-drawn dagger. But beyond that, Joel's understanding of the text and concept as a whole is so sharp that his own changes to certain scenes/characters offer a savvy new take on a 400 year old tale.
With beautiful use of lighting and a lack of props, to put complete focus on the characters. While also using the lightning during the film to set different moods and feelings. With an incredibly slow start, this movie might seem boring at first but end up finishing intensely.
The negative reviews surrounding The Tragedy of Macbeth are disappointing. To be fair, without subtitles I wouldn't understand much either. But saying this cast is "woke" is downright disrespectful to the amazing performance by Washington.
The Tragedy of Macbeth is a beautiful piece of film. It's definitely a film worth seeing but a lot of people will be disappointed in the slow start and use of old English.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe first solo directorial effort by Joel Coen. All of his previous films have been co-directed with his brother Ethan Coen, though Ethan was uncredited as director until 2004 due to DGA rules about directing duos.
- ErroresWhen Banquo and Fleance prepare to leave, Macbeth tells them their horses are ready. But Denzel Washington gets the line backwards. He says, "I commend them to your backs," instead of "I commend you to their backs." He speaks of plural horses, but in the next shot, Fleance is riding the only horse, and Banquo is walking.
- Citas
Macbeth: Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, creeps in this petty pace from day to day to the last syllable of recorded time. And all our yesterdays have lighted fools the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle. Life is but a walking shadow... a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot... full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
- Bandas sonorasFair Is Foul (feat. Kathryn Hunter)
Artist: Carter Burwell
Selecciones populares
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 524,771
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 45min(105 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1