CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
3.7/10
3.5 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaA reluctant babysitter must protect three kids from an invasion of ravenous critters.A reluctant babysitter must protect three kids from an invasion of ravenous critters.A reluctant babysitter must protect three kids from an invasion of ravenous critters.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
Greg Parves
- Telephone Repairman
- (as Greg Parvess)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Bad script, bad acting, bad effects. Why dee wallace is in this movie is a mystery for me.
Now this is a real wet nappy film about an 80's classic horror brought into the 21st Century and failed so bad even a rewrite wont make it work.
Rediculous time waster. From the acting to the silly looking critters. This is clearly not what critters was like in the 1980's.
Don't bother watching this film. Might be fun with a whole bag of weed. 2 out of 10 for this garbage.
Rediculous time waster. From the acting to the silly looking critters. This is clearly not what critters was like in the 1980's.
Don't bother watching this film. Might be fun with a whole bag of weed. 2 out of 10 for this garbage.
Imo This movie is just a Cash grab.
The acting is horrible, and the scenes are not well put together. they also come with the wacky's weakness to the Critters that kills the mood to watch the rest.
Are you a Critter fan and loved the old movies then do not watch this movie. Its cheap and bad.
The acting is horrible, and the scenes are not well put together. they also come with the wacky's weakness to the Critters that kills the mood to watch the rest.
Are you a Critter fan and loved the old movies then do not watch this movie. Its cheap and bad.
First, this a tv movie so it looks pretty cheap. Second the only thing related with the previous criters movies is the name. And last but not least there is no plot, pretty bad acting and no decent fx. So, overall a pretty bad movie even for fans like me that have watched all the criters movies. Avoid.
I've been a fan of the Critters series since I was in my early teens, now in my 20s we have a new one and I was pretty excited, especially after The New Binge series came out on Shudder and was bad but pretty enjoyable. I had hopes that this would be a bit better considering its a film rather than a web series. And it is pretty decent, not great, but lets not lie here after the first Critters film the series went downhill pretty quickly but they were still fun and tons of people are just as nostalgic for the sequels as they are for the original. After seeing the average rating and high number of negative reviews on here I expected it to be as bad, maybe even worse than The New Binge, well I'm here to tell ya, this is nowhere near bad especially when compared to the original sequels or The New Binge. Either way, lets actually talk about this.
So as an entry in the series Critters 5 is about on par with the first or second sequel, its pretty much a standalone film though, you can watch and enjoy this film without any prior knowledge of the series and enjoy it just as much. The film is decently acted and has some good effects and practical puppetry and gore. The writing is fine, it kinda feels like a fan fiction with a sequel this late in the series trying to add more lore but its not as bad as the fan fiction feeling of The New Binge, if you have watched that series you will know why.
Judging the film on its own, its a pretty fun and entertaining direct to video/TV movie that is worth a shot if you got time to kill and are a fan of the series. Compared to the rest of the series, especially if you include everything, including The New Binge its a welcome entry to the series.
Is it bad? Sure from a serious critical stance it is, but that doesn't mean it isn't of quality in some ways and doesn't mean its not enjoyable. See it for yourself before letting the intensely negative, all caps, three sentence long reviews calling it "THE WORST MOVIE EVER MADE!! PLEASE STAY AWAY!" discourage you.
I give it a 6.5/10
So as an entry in the series Critters 5 is about on par with the first or second sequel, its pretty much a standalone film though, you can watch and enjoy this film without any prior knowledge of the series and enjoy it just as much. The film is decently acted and has some good effects and practical puppetry and gore. The writing is fine, it kinda feels like a fan fiction with a sequel this late in the series trying to add more lore but its not as bad as the fan fiction feeling of The New Binge, if you have watched that series you will know why.
Judging the film on its own, its a pretty fun and entertaining direct to video/TV movie that is worth a shot if you got time to kill and are a fan of the series. Compared to the rest of the series, especially if you include everything, including The New Binge its a welcome entry to the series.
Is it bad? Sure from a serious critical stance it is, but that doesn't mean it isn't of quality in some ways and doesn't mean its not enjoyable. See it for yourself before letting the intensely negative, all caps, three sentence long reviews calling it "THE WORST MOVIE EVER MADE!! PLEASE STAY AWAY!" discourage you.
I give it a 6.5/10
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe first 'Critters' film to be rated R, all previous entries were rated PG-13.
- ErroresThe metal edges around the hole in the trunk of the car are pushed out as if something were trying to get out of the trunk instead of pushed in like it should have been .
- Citas
Chef Loong: Taste my steel, you rat bastards. I have the best blades in the business.
- ConexionesFeatured in WhatCulture Originals: 10 Worst Horror Movies of 2019 (2019)
- Bandas sonorasLow
Written by Robin Sherwell
Performed by Robin Sherwell
Courtesy of Birdland Records
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 29 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta