En un futuro desconocido, dos almas endurecidas se encuentran y se enfrentan a las cosas que han hecho y en las que se han convertido.En un futuro desconocido, dos almas endurecidas se encuentran y se enfrentan a las cosas que han hecho y en las que se han convertido.En un futuro desconocido, dos almas endurecidas se encuentran y se enfrentan a las cosas que han hecho y en las que se han convertido.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This movie is not really worth spending time to review but I will in a few brief words anyway. The pace is terrible. The plot and scenes are completely disjointed. You are left trying to figure out what the hell is happening for close to 3/4 of the movie. Half the movie has voice-over from the characters that means nothing because you don't know what's going on to begin with. The story itself what actually interesting and could have been something with different direction and editing.
It's an ambitious task producing a science fiction movie on an obviously low budget, especially if the content focuses on condition rather than plot.
The movie's cinematography is well worth watching, also editing is well made, but without a straight plot, scripting has to carry a heavy load because every scene has to stand for itself. Unfortunately, it doesn't hold up to the task. Though the dialogues seek philosophical depth, they lack refinement, constantly throwing me out of the suspension of disbelief.
Acting is just fine, including that of Ryan Kwanten who plays the lead role of Jack. However, his sloppy diction is hard to take. Eager to be as authentic as possible, he sacrifices his control over speech which makes him simply hard to understand.
Also, there are too many references to "Blade Runner": A lonesome killer seeking love, voiceover narration, androids, the lifespan issue, an Asian future city, even the soundtrack that sounds like Vangelis at times - there are just too many parallels.
Great Hong Kong footage, good editing, but overall an overambitious undertaking.
The movie's cinematography is well worth watching, also editing is well made, but without a straight plot, scripting has to carry a heavy load because every scene has to stand for itself. Unfortunately, it doesn't hold up to the task. Though the dialogues seek philosophical depth, they lack refinement, constantly throwing me out of the suspension of disbelief.
Acting is just fine, including that of Ryan Kwanten who plays the lead role of Jack. However, his sloppy diction is hard to take. Eager to be as authentic as possible, he sacrifices his control over speech which makes him simply hard to understand.
Also, there are too many references to "Blade Runner": A lonesome killer seeking love, voiceover narration, androids, the lifespan issue, an Asian future city, even the soundtrack that sounds like Vangelis at times - there are just too many parallels.
Great Hong Kong footage, good editing, but overall an overambitious undertaking.
Saw this at the wonderful Sun Theatre in Yarraville. The highlight was the movie being introduced by Ivan and Hugo. I really wanted to like it because they were both great but... I didn't.
I enjoyed the Hong Kong backdrop and most of the visuals and sound but really didn't dig the story (or lack of).
Ivan indicated that he did everything when he made this movie, maybe he should get some outside input in his next project.
I left the movie confused.
I enjoyed the Hong Kong backdrop and most of the visuals and sound but really didn't dig the story (or lack of).
Ivan indicated that he did everything when he made this movie, maybe he should get some outside input in his next project.
I left the movie confused.
I was looking forward to this film as I very much enjoyed Mystery Road and Goldstone. (It seems it has been released as Expired rather than the current 'Loveland' title here on imdb.)
As a sci-fi film it is clearly somewhat hamstrung by a lack of budget. You get a couple of distant shots of a futuristic city but then all the filming of the cast are just on the street, 'today'. Nobody dresses any different, the cars and streets are all unchanged, its slighlty jarring. There are a lot of people walking around with umbrellas up, even though its not raining. I can only guess the plan was to cgi some of these sequences but maybe the money ran out.
That aside when it starts it is really difficult to hear the lead actor. He speaks so quietly and is way down in the mix so that you can't hear what he is saying about half of the time. Most of the (long) opening narration is inaudible and throughout the film it's often a struggle to make out his dialogue. Its somewhat ironic all the Chinese cast, who speak clearly, are subtitled where it is the lead who really needs it.
Its a very slow film and there really isn't much in the way of story. There is no chemistry at all between the two leads either so it was ultimately not very interesting. I made it to the end hoping there would be something more but then it ended.
It seems to want to be a kind of mash-up between Paris, Texas and Blade Runner but its like thats as far as the idea went.
As a sci-fi film it is clearly somewhat hamstrung by a lack of budget. You get a couple of distant shots of a futuristic city but then all the filming of the cast are just on the street, 'today'. Nobody dresses any different, the cars and streets are all unchanged, its slighlty jarring. There are a lot of people walking around with umbrellas up, even though its not raining. I can only guess the plan was to cgi some of these sequences but maybe the money ran out.
That aside when it starts it is really difficult to hear the lead actor. He speaks so quietly and is way down in the mix so that you can't hear what he is saying about half of the time. Most of the (long) opening narration is inaudible and throughout the film it's often a struggle to make out his dialogue. Its somewhat ironic all the Chinese cast, who speak clearly, are subtitled where it is the lead who really needs it.
Its a very slow film and there really isn't much in the way of story. There is no chemistry at all between the two leads either so it was ultimately not very interesting. I made it to the end hoping there would be something more but then it ended.
It seems to want to be a kind of mash-up between Paris, Texas and Blade Runner but its like thats as far as the idea went.
This film tries to be deep and meaningful with a distinct Blade Runner skyline interspersed with real, busy street scenes. It just fails to ignite, the story isn't clear, Weaving is under used and the male lead has to be the most scruffy, miserable SOB i've ever come across.
His mumbling frustrates as do the extended scenes where nothing happens, without even minimal (poor) dialogue to break it up.
The girl has the sort of face that'll get work and , no doubt she can act.
Hugo was doing his bit for Oz, that's fair enough, the other two leads need to dust themselves off and try again.
His mumbling frustrates as do the extended scenes where nothing happens, without even minimal (poor) dialogue to break it up.
The girl has the sort of face that'll get work and , no doubt she can act.
Hugo was doing his bit for Oz, that's fair enough, the other two leads need to dust themselves off and try again.
¿Sabías que…?
- ConexionesReferences Blade Runner (1982)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Expired?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 27,150
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 42 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta