CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.1/10
2.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Un niño lidia con la pérdida de su madre creando una relación peligrosa con un monstruo que se rumorea que vive en el bosque.Un niño lidia con la pérdida de su madre creando una relación peligrosa con un monstruo que se rumorea que vive en el bosque.Un niño lidia con la pérdida de su madre creando una relación peligrosa con un monstruo que se rumorea que vive en el bosque.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 3 premios ganados en total
Michael David Thurston
- AirBnB Friend
- (as Michael Thurston)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
2thao
The idea for the plot is good but the execution is shockingly amateurish. It fails on most levels. The actor who plays the older brother is really bad and most of the other actors just phone it in. The film becomes preachy and predictable and it even ends with a preachy text telling us how to interpret it and why this film is noble. I kid you not!
I lay most of the blame on the director/writer. There is no consistency in anything here and the plot set ups are lazy and too obvious to blend naturally into the story.
The young brother was however quite good and I liked the hands of the monster.
I lay most of the blame on the director/writer. There is no consistency in anything here and the plot set ups are lazy and too obvious to blend naturally into the story.
The young brother was however quite good and I liked the hands of the monster.
The plot was going good until the police station catastrophe. It is easy to see that there was no way that boy could have done that kind of damage. The director/writer should have at least revealed the "why or who" .Like the movie "Hitcher". Where the main character portrays separately.
This horror allegory has a unique premise that unfolds in a fresh, realistic way, but the execution is very poor.
The premise is that the boy protagonist has a monster who helps him to deal with his struggles--an animalistic, witchlike ogre who behaves something like a trained attack dog, willing to play along with her companion but always ready to viciously attack. The boy faces numerous struggles--grief, puberty, poverty, bullying--and the impulsive violence manifested by his monster represents the only method he knows for confronting those problems. This is a horror of stunted emotional development. The screenplay, acting, and on-location filming present this premise in a way that is refreshingly free from cliches. There seems to be an autobiographical core breathing life into this film.
Nevertheless, I found it extremely tedious. For a movie that's less than 90 minutes, it seems like quite a slog. Something about the editing and pacing of the film is disorienting in an unintentional way: one scene ends, the next begins, the tone and setting abruptly shifts, and it isn't quite clear how much time has passed in between. Cause and effect become ambiguous, the flow is extremely choppy, and none of that clunkiness seems to contribute anything to the film. The end result is that my husband and I were consistently confused about how the movie's themes were progressing and how the events of the scenes related to each other.
The filmmakers have potential and this film certainly has something meaningful to say, yet I wouldn't recommend trying to sit through it.
The premise is that the boy protagonist has a monster who helps him to deal with his struggles--an animalistic, witchlike ogre who behaves something like a trained attack dog, willing to play along with her companion but always ready to viciously attack. The boy faces numerous struggles--grief, puberty, poverty, bullying--and the impulsive violence manifested by his monster represents the only method he knows for confronting those problems. This is a horror of stunted emotional development. The screenplay, acting, and on-location filming present this premise in a way that is refreshingly free from cliches. There seems to be an autobiographical core breathing life into this film.
Nevertheless, I found it extremely tedious. For a movie that's less than 90 minutes, it seems like quite a slog. Something about the editing and pacing of the film is disorienting in an unintentional way: one scene ends, the next begins, the tone and setting abruptly shifts, and it isn't quite clear how much time has passed in between. Cause and effect become ambiguous, the flow is extremely choppy, and none of that clunkiness seems to contribute anything to the film. The end result is that my husband and I were consistently confused about how the movie's themes were progressing and how the events of the scenes related to each other.
The filmmakers have potential and this film certainly has something meaningful to say, yet I wouldn't recommend trying to sit through it.
The movie seems very interesting at start but then the story starts to become boring..some artists seems poor in acting..it had potential and could be a uch better movie.
It's one of those movies that makes you think. We're constantly wondering if the murderer is a human from the film or the monster. There's definitely metaphors there. I really liked it, and while you can definitely tell it's low budget, it does a lot with a little.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaLukas Hassel reprises his role as the monster, now called the Virago Witch, from the 2017 short film.
- ConexionesRemake of Slapface (2018)
- Bandas sonorasMade It
Written by Michael Harris Jr. and Samuel James Moses
Performed by McCall
Courtesy of Soundstripe Productions
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Slapface?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 70,680
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 25 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta