Agrega una trama en tu idiomaWhen MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini discovers that facial recognition does not see dark-skinned faces accurately, she embarks on a journey to push for the first-ever U.S. legislatio... Leer todoWhen MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini discovers that facial recognition does not see dark-skinned faces accurately, she embarks on a journey to push for the first-ever U.S. legislation against bias in algorithms that impact us all.When MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini discovers that facial recognition does not see dark-skinned faces accurately, she embarks on a journey to push for the first-ever U.S. legislation against bias in algorithms that impact us all.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 3 premios ganados y 6 nominaciones en total
- Self - Author, Weapons of Math Destruction
- (as Cathy O'Neil Ph.D.)
- Self - Author, Twitter and Tear Gas
- (as Zeynep Tufekci Ph.D.)
- Self - Author, Automating Inequality
- (as Virginia Eubanks Ph.D.)
- Self - Technical Co-Lead, Ethical A.I. Team at Google
- (as Timnit Gebru Ph.D.)
- Self - Author, Algorithms of Oppression
- (as Safiya Umoja Noble Ph.D.)
Opiniones destacadas
That said, this documentary feels incomplete. It seems to be one-sided, with lots of interviews with people who are against the use of AI.
But while the film-makers do an ok job of highlighting the dangers and inadequacies of AI systems such as facial recognition software, they failed to show what really is behind these glaring.blunders - was it some kind of knowing omission meant to create more biases, was it a case of software engineers creating something that they themselves don't understand and thus making a mess of things, or was it simply incompetence.on the part of many involved?
Who knows. And that's the problem with this film.
The execution of this documentary, however, is very underwhelming, to say the least. There are the usuals: catchy montages, TED-style interviews, news soundbites, and the most annoying of all - artificially created (pun intended) graphics of AI scanning data in a stereotypical digital font paired with silly sound effects which, unless the primary audience of this documentary is fifth graders, I don't understand why it's necessary to incessantly rehash them. And then there's the unimaginative 'robotic voice.' It's just puerile.
Maybe the producers are wary that people still won't get the danger of unregulated AI without these gimmicks. But I'd argue that people would be more alarmed to learn how AI has been infiltrating and affecting our lives in the least expected ways. If the documentary can clearly point out the potential harms as a consequence, I think people will naturally find the lack of regulation disturbing, no silly visuals and sound effects are needed. Sometimes I think they actually undermine the severity of potential danger at hand. For example, the scene where a teenager is mistakenly stopped by plainclothes police, instead of being accompanied with yet another piece of cheesy soundtrack meant to suggest danger, it would be so much more powerful if everything is just eerily silent.
And the interviews and info - yes, AI is like a black box even to the programmers, but can you explain it in layman's terms so that people get it? - could be a lot more insightful. Even some short Vox-style Youtube clips have explored these issues in greater depth.
The themes explored are a bit all over the place too. I get it this domain is relatively new, so the vocabulary and focus aren't that streamlined yet, still... Sometimes the documentary brings up issues of obvious biases, which is consistent with the title, but sometimes we don't even know what the problem is, it's simply an issue of things being completely nontransparent and/or unverified by a third party. The China parts are also a little disjointed from the rest of the documentary and the country itself is painted in broad strokes - it's as if we can't do good until we can identify the bad guy to feel good about ourselves.
There´s little focus but very hyperbolic interpertation of the data when it came to racial profiling by the AI... just a whiff of "wokeness" that was digestible to me, but also caused the polarization on this review section.
The rest of the documentary is well produced, informative, and seriously eye opening and you should see it because any of the negatives at least for me dont even come close to the deeper understandig you get from practical examples you see around the world that are very scary.
.
¿Sabías que…?
- Citas
Self - Author, Weapons of Math Destruction: On internet advertising as data scientists, we are competing for eyeballs on one hand, but really we're competing for eyeballs of rich people. And then, the poor people, who's competing for their eyeballs? Predatory industries. So payday lenders, or for-profit colleges, or Caesars Palace. Like, really predatory crap.
- ConexionesFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episode #4.95 (2021)
Selecciones populares
- How long is Coded Bias?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Kodlanmış Önyargı
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 10,236
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 10,236
- 15 nov 2020
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 10,236
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 26 minutos
- Color