CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.9/10
2.8 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una revisión de la investigación de la psiquiatra forense Dorothy Otnow Lewis, que investigó la psicología de los asesinos.Una revisión de la investigación de la psiquiatra forense Dorothy Otnow Lewis, que investigó la psicología de los asesinos.Una revisión de la investigación de la psiquiatra forense Dorothy Otnow Lewis, que investigó la psicología de los asesinos.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Dorothy Otnow Lewis
- Self - Clinical Psychiatrist
- (as Dorothy Lewis)
Catherine Yeager
- Self - Clinical Psychologist
- (as Dr. Catherine Yeager)
Park Dietz
- Self - Forensic Psychiatrist
- (as Dr. Park Dietz)
Tom Brokaw
- Self - Host, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw
- (material de archivo)
Bill Clinton
- Self - Governor of Arkansas
- (material de archivo)
Thomas Coccuzzi
- Self - Defense Attorney for Arthur Shawcross
- (material de archivo)
Walt Disney
- Self - Animator
- (material de archivo)
- …
William Elledge
- Self - Convicted Murderer
- (material de archivo)
Henry Ford
- Self - Industrialist & Antisemite
- (material de archivo)
Joseph Paul Franklin
- Self - Convicted Murderer & Neo-Nazi Terrorist
- (material de archivo)
Charles Gibson
- Self - ABC News Anchor
- (material de archivo)
Joseph Goebbels
- Self - Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 - 1945
- (material de archivo)
Hermann Göring
- Self - President of the Reichstag, 1932 - 1945
- (material de archivo)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - Führer and Chancellor of Germany
- (material de archivo)
Joseph P. Kennedy
- Self - Kennedy Family Patriarch & Antisemite
- (material de archivo)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
This documentary provided little insight into the study of the disassociative mind but rather highlighted Dr. Lewis's view of her most spectacular interactions with famous murderers. The documentary managed to turn a fascinating subject into a 😴.
Purely an "anti death penalty" movie based on the notion that ALL murderers are brain damaged or have multiple personality/dissociative identity disorder. A lot of it is just pure BS based in nothing close to real science.
On the subject dissosiative personality disorder, or the scapegoat to every ''eye for an eye''-fanaticand criminal court systen back in the medeval ages of 1980's and 1990's usa. beloved and hatred for her simple claim that noone is born evil, and that there are always an environmental or medical disorder behind every crime, the worse a crime, the more damaged the perputrator are.having an ethical code that says if your insane you cannot be punished to death by excecution, and that is a roaring cry that should be heard among the medical and justice superiors in every criminal court anywhere.
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
its a docu that can make the viewer feel sick, and the mentaly instable turn unstable. because the case descriptions and lots of the material in the cases from real life are so grotesque, graphic and violent in its nature. so beware and behold, its an interesting ride, but can be a bold swallow to take.the grumpy old man recommends
I think most reasonably intelligent people realize that some of the most sadistic, unempathetic, sociopathic criminals in our midst come from awful backgrounds, dysfunctional families, abuse, and trauma. The credibility of this program's assertions quickly ends there.
The program proceeds to document two academic psychotherapists being led around by the nose by some of the most manipulative personalities known, psychopathic sexual sadists and murderers. Murders who repeatedly and conveniently evidence, for the first time, multiple personality disorders, when interviewed by these two. Performances which are encouraged and almost welcomed with glee. If you want to watch something that will strip you of any faith you might have in defense "experts," watch this. This is the definition of confirmation bias in quasi-science.
The program proceeds to document two academic psychotherapists being led around by the nose by some of the most manipulative personalities known, psychopathic sexual sadists and murderers. Murders who repeatedly and conveniently evidence, for the first time, multiple personality disorders, when interviewed by these two. Performances which are encouraged and almost welcomed with glee. If you want to watch something that will strip you of any faith you might have in defense "experts," watch this. This is the definition of confirmation bias in quasi-science.
Super interesting topic. Not saying her work isn't valid, but how it's presented is one-sided. Knowing it is a highly divisive area of psychology, no scrutinizing opposing views are explored. It's difficult to take the content as unbiased - even if they're on to something. I didn't get anything out of it. The doctor seems like a sweet lady and I do appreciate her humanitarian approach.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaDissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder, is a highly controversial diagnosis, with many arguments against it being anything more than an iatrogenic disorder -- in other words, caused by the therapy/therapist itself. Most notable amongst these arguments is that unlike other psychological disorders, DID is not observed outside of treatment with certain select clinicians, all of whom already believe in DID. What has been observed across all clinicians and researchers, however, are examples of confirmation bias, persuasive interview techniques, demand characteristics, and the oftentimes overwhelming urge to please demonstrated by patients in general. In addition, early North American works (DID is an overwhelmingly American disorder, yet another point of contention for the pro/anti-DID debate) which are seen as having started the DID diagnosis trend have been debunked in recent years as primarily fictitious stories, written to sell books. As controversial as the diagnosis of DID is, many feel that there may be some degree of negligence on the part of the producer(s), the director, and the film company as a whole for not employing a disclaimer as well as affording equal time to opposing expert viewpoints.
- ConexionesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 777: Mank + The Queen's Gambit (2020)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Crazy, Not Insane?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 59 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Crazy, Not Insane (2020) officially released in India in English?
Responda