Mickey 17

Written and directed by Bong Joon Ho, "Mickey 17" is a new sci-fi comedy starring Robert Pattinson as Mickey, an expendable. Mickey signs up for a space voyage as an expendable, which means he'll be remade after each death that occurs while doing taxing work. The movie also stars Mark Ruffalo, Toni Collette, and Naomi Ackie. "Mickey 17" was one of my most anticipated movies this year because Bong Joon Ho is an award-winning director who has made unique movies.

Bong Joon Ho seems to get the very best out of his actors, and they want to bring Ho's vision to life. Robert Pattinson was amazing in this dual performance as he gives unique identities to each character. Mark Ruffalo as the petty dictator was very entertaining. After seeing him in this and "Poor Things", I want to see him in more weird roles. The themes around classes, politics, and colonization were entertaining and impactful despite those themes occasionally being beaten into our heads. I enjoyed the unique experience from this movie, and I am glad it was a goofy, satirical movie unlike "Parasite."

Despite amazing performances, there were some flaws in this movie that bothered me. The beginning was very slow in my opinion because we went back in time to see how he got there. During this, we get a voiceover to narrate what was happening. They easily could have started there. With this beginning, I thought the movie had some pacing issues, mostly due to this. Some elements in the movie seemed to be important, such as the side romance plot, but they were never mentioned again. The climax was entertaining and contained the most action; however, the ending included a dream sequence that felt very unnecessary.

Overall, I found this movie to be enjoyable, but it was slightly disappointing compared to expectations. I am glad I got to see this relatively soon after it came out. I recommend checking this movie out on HBO Max.

First, the film is beautiful and enjoyable to watch. They did a good job in terms of cinematography, music, and acting. All the actors were good, especially Robert Pattinson, but they failed in several aspects, which led to a lower rating and a decline in quality.

To be honest, I had difficulty understanding the film's story and message because it dealt with several topics, such as political rulers and how they are controlled, the meaning of cloning, and whether it is ethical or not, and several other topics. However, as the film progressed, we were unable to focus on all the topics and finish it.

There are so many characters in the film, and if you can remember more than three names, I salute you. I only remember Mickey, his girlfriend Nasha, and his dirty friend Timo. To be honest, we weren't given enough time to get attached to the characters and see their development throughout the film. Most of them, if not all of them, are the same from beginning to end, except for the few.

Director Bong Joon-ho presented a very impressive Skyfall atmosphere mixed with Dark comedy, and it was good.

Robert Pattinson excels in every film and shows his talent for acting, and the two characters he played were wonderfully portrayed.

Finally, the film is very entertaining, but the negatives affected the final rating. However, the film is worth watching.

Nothing incredibly groundbreaking, and a little heavy handed with the satire, but a fun ride and well shot, with all of the "I shouldn't laugh at this but I am" that you'd expect

I am guilty, as many others will be, of comparing this to Parasite. Doing so is doing the movie a disservice. From Bong Joon Ho I was not expecting a silly black comedy that would have the whole theater laughing. Accept and enjoy it and you'll have a great time.

Although I felt like I was getting slapped in the face with the Trump satire, it still hit pretty well and got a good few laughs out of me.

After all this, I'm still wondering what the sauce is about...

Mickey 17 had the potential to be an innovative sci-fi/comedy film, and it starts off in an engaging and original way. However, as the story progresses, it loses focus and ultimately turns into something generic, with an uninspired and rushed conclusion.

Robert Pattinson delivers a solid and well-rounded performance, proving his versatility even in a film that leans more towards comedy - something outside his usual genre. Despite the lighter tone, Pattinson brings depth to his character, making the story feel more grounded and adding an emotional layer to the film that otherwise would feel empty.

Cloning is a fascinating subject for a sci-fi movie because of all the moral and practical dilemmas it presents. Mickey 17 introduces these ideas but doesn't fully engage in them, shifting focus to a less compelling storyline midway through - the Creepers.

It feels out of the place compared to the film's promising start and even the trailers- The initial mix of humor and originality is lost, and by the end, the movie feels like it was hurriedly wrapped up just to deliver something, lacking any real creativity or impact.

That said, the film excels in its production design. The setting and character outfits are well-crafter, adding to the immersive sci-fi atmosphere. Additionally, the visual effects are compelling, bringing the futuristic world to life in a convincing and visually stunning way, which helps maintain engagement even when the story fails to do so.

For being a sci-fi flick it does ok. It doesn't introduce anything groundbreaking but it is something different. Does it hold up to other sci-fi films? I'd say no, but if you're looking for an average film to burn 2 hours with this does the job.

I will say that considering who it was written and directed by, there was a much higher expectation. After watching a film like Parasite, which was very well done, this was rather tame. I think part of it is the narration and the other part was the writing. Acting wise I think everyone did a fine job, there were themes that were put out there that didn't quite hit or didn't really matter as the story unfolds, and while I could sympathize with the characters and the situations, the actions and consequences of them didn't carry much weight.

This didn't seem to be set up for a sequel and probably for the best, but I'd be curious to see if a part 2 would have more to offer. Overall I gave it a 6 and likely wont see it again.