CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.3/10
4.7 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Una mujer angustiada al borde del divorcio vuelve a su viejo hogar junto a su hermana menor después de muchos años. Pero cuando su hermana y su cuñado traicionan su confianza, ella se embarc... Leer todoUna mujer angustiada al borde del divorcio vuelve a su viejo hogar junto a su hermana menor después de muchos años. Pero cuando su hermana y su cuñado traicionan su confianza, ella se embarca en una cruel cruzada de venganza.Una mujer angustiada al borde del divorcio vuelve a su viejo hogar junto a su hermana menor después de muchos años. Pero cuando su hermana y su cuñado traicionan su confianza, ella se embarca en una cruel cruzada de venganza.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 7 premios ganados y 16 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
It's wholly different from any other rape-revenge movie out there, and has so much to say about the genre and an audience's thirst for revenge. Not strictly a horror film. I'd call it more of a Haneke type drama with some truly grotesque moments.
If you go down to the woods today and you're a rabbit or a predatory opportunist, there's a good chance you'll get your big surprise and it won't be a pleasant picnic. Refreshing and brave, original and relevant, reflective and increasingly expansive, just as progressive and contemporary filmmaking should be.
Don't get the bad reviews here. Timeline was not confusing, the movie just demands attention to details. And the fact that male nudity triggers so much repulsion. Come on already.
The only thing I don't get is why it's supposed to be a horror movie. Maybe that triggers the wrong expectations.
Is the protagonist victim, avenger or offender? Hitler and Lenon kind of hit the spot there....
The only thing I don't get is why it's supposed to be a horror movie. Maybe that triggers the wrong expectations.
Is the protagonist victim, avenger or offender? Hitler and Lenon kind of hit the spot there....
This was the absolutely most annoyingly too-long and too-slow film I've ever seen. Someone forgot to get the reel to the editor, because each and every scene was between 25-95% too long and dragged out. I lost count how many times we all yelled at the screen "omg get on with it already" or "someone please fast forward this already". This film is the epitome of "too much filler and very little substance". I've never been and seen a more annoyed audience.
The ridiculously too-long-for-this-film 107 mins felt like over 3 hours. The useless and unnecessary Nat. Geo nature shots were utterly annoying and pointless, so let's take 15 mins off for that nonsense. Now cut out an average 70% from every single scene. Now you're left with a 28 min short film, that will hold every viewers attention, eyes glued to the screen, with them sitting on the edge of their seat, with their heart racing and blood pressure elevating. THAT, is what makes a great film, not endless useless fluff and filler that makes you angry and lose interest - constantly.
Just for fun, I will use a basic editing program and cut this film down to a short myself, just to watch it again and actually enjoy it, as well as recommend only my version for viewing to my friends and family. Otherwise if you really hate someone, have them watch this full dragged out long and boring annoying nonsense.
Clearly the problem here was that collab'd writers and directors Dusty Mancinelli and Madeleine Sims-Fewer have only written and directed short films, this being their first full length feature - that should've also been a short. Aside from some plot and technical issues, the core concept and guts of their story was excellent, especially taking some gambles with gore and borderline soft-p0rn nudity. Unfortunately, transferring that concept into a full length screenplay, ended up a muddled melodramatic mess beyond belief. Had more writing been invested in the characters relationships and dynamics, this may have worked as a full length film.
The cinematography was horrible with the worst decision for color filters and contrast. The shaky cam was bearable, but the close-ups were unrecognizable for the most part. You'll squint, get closer, go farther, rewind and relook, and you still won't be able to make out what the heck you're supposed to be looking at. And then out of nowhere, for no reason, a bug is in the frame lol. The score was very fitting, although it was also too loud, too frequent, and overbearing in some parts. Performances were on point and convincing, especially Sims-Fewer.
Although this was a low budget indie film, it still had serious contention to be great - had it been edited/cut down to a short, of which I am determined to do myself, and/or had more substance and much less filler. It's a very generous 5/10 from me, more so for the efforts invested.
The ridiculously too-long-for-this-film 107 mins felt like over 3 hours. The useless and unnecessary Nat. Geo nature shots were utterly annoying and pointless, so let's take 15 mins off for that nonsense. Now cut out an average 70% from every single scene. Now you're left with a 28 min short film, that will hold every viewers attention, eyes glued to the screen, with them sitting on the edge of their seat, with their heart racing and blood pressure elevating. THAT, is what makes a great film, not endless useless fluff and filler that makes you angry and lose interest - constantly.
Just for fun, I will use a basic editing program and cut this film down to a short myself, just to watch it again and actually enjoy it, as well as recommend only my version for viewing to my friends and family. Otherwise if you really hate someone, have them watch this full dragged out long and boring annoying nonsense.
Clearly the problem here was that collab'd writers and directors Dusty Mancinelli and Madeleine Sims-Fewer have only written and directed short films, this being their first full length feature - that should've also been a short. Aside from some plot and technical issues, the core concept and guts of their story was excellent, especially taking some gambles with gore and borderline soft-p0rn nudity. Unfortunately, transferring that concept into a full length screenplay, ended up a muddled melodramatic mess beyond belief. Had more writing been invested in the characters relationships and dynamics, this may have worked as a full length film.
The cinematography was horrible with the worst decision for color filters and contrast. The shaky cam was bearable, but the close-ups were unrecognizable for the most part. You'll squint, get closer, go farther, rewind and relook, and you still won't be able to make out what the heck you're supposed to be looking at. And then out of nowhere, for no reason, a bug is in the frame lol. The score was very fitting, although it was also too loud, too frequent, and overbearing in some parts. Performances were on point and convincing, especially Sims-Fewer.
Although this was a low budget indie film, it still had serious contention to be great - had it been edited/cut down to a short, of which I am determined to do myself, and/or had more substance and much less filler. It's a very generous 5/10 from me, more so for the efforts invested.
The pace of the movie was very slow. I got bored watching. It's not a horror movie. The drama aspect of the movie predominates. The director emulates biologists in the movie. He took a long shot of clear, enlarged images of caterpillars, birds, fingers and fingernails, and even the stamens. It's like he wasted time prolonging unnecessary scenes so that the movie would be longer.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaMadeleine Sims-Fewer said in an interview that she was inspired by male antiheroes from other films -- like Taxi Driver's Travis Bickle and Harvey Keitel in Bad Lieutenant -- for her character because she couldn't think of any female antiheroes who felt the same way the men did. She said those men "do really unspeakable things but you're still along for the ride with them. That's something that I feel really passionately about, creating these characters who are despicable and who are awful and conflicted and almost kind of OCD in their single-mindedness of what they think is right. Miriam believes that she is a crusader for good. Whatever we then see of her as an audience, it was integral that she thinks she is the white knight in the story."
- ErroresWe see that the main character burns the bodies of the people she kills in a bonfire, and then sprinkles their ashes in the nearby lake. But a bonfire would not produce ashes. The bones would not burn, so the skeleton would remain, even after dismemberment.
- Créditos curiososThe end credits background has a kaleidoscope montage.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Horror Movies of 2021 (So Far) (2021)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Violation?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 47min(107 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta