Go-Big Show

The voting process seems inconsistent. Competitors are not even in the same category of competition and then the voting is based on what? Likable back story vs actual talent?

The premise of the show is great, the execution is a fail!! how do you put a singer against a stunt person and then use the most ridiculous method of scoring I have ever seen! the Judges may be cool, but the show is a fail to me.

to save the show I would start first by putting like acts together so that it makes sense, and then change the Scoring from the dumb Hand throttles, to a simple points system where the judges actually judge characteristics of the acts like excitement factor, crowd excitement, danger level, who knows, pick a couple for each type of act and let them actually judge based on a criteria! then the winner is the one with the most criteria based points, which makes sense!

they shove this garbage down our throats 3 times a day 6 days a week for months, at least make it worth watching!

This show is so underwhelming in the acts. With a show called "go big show" you would expect the acts to be entertaining but simply put this show is not worth the watch.

There is no rhyme or reason why somebody wins. The winner is chosen if the network/show would get better ratings. Average acts can beat really death defying acts. Just too pc and just plain bad. So bad I deleted the timer that was recording episodes.

I was SO disappointed by this show. The scoring system is awful, very disappointed with the final scoring (hope others feel the same). I watched this show expecting people to "go big" ie: dangerous stunts, risky talents, etc. Yet the winner (although VERY talented) did not "go big".