CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
6.4/10
267
TU CALIFICACIÓN
El 13 de marzo de 1997, miles observando el cometa Halle-Bopp vieron una formación luminosa en V cruzar Arizona. El fenómeno silencioso y bajo hizo titulares nacionales en grandes medios.El 13 de marzo de 1997, miles observando el cometa Halle-Bopp vieron una formación luminosa en V cruzar Arizona. El fenómeno silencioso y bajo hizo titulares nacionales en grandes medios.El 13 de marzo de 1997, miles observando el cometa Halle-Bopp vieron una formación luminosa en V cruzar Arizona. El fenómeno silencioso y bajo hizo titulares nacionales en grandes medios.
Frances Emma Barwood
- Self - Former Phoenix Councilwoman & Vice Mayor
- (as Frances Barwood)
Tom Brunty
- Self - Religious Studies, Arizona State University
- (as Tom Brunty M.A.)
Paul Cook
- Self - A.S.U. English Professor, Author
- (as Paul Cook Ph.D.)
Rebecca Hardcastle
- Self - Ordained Minister
- (as Rebecca Hardcastle M.Div. Ph.D.)
Ruth Hover
- Self - Psychologist
- (as Ruth Hover Ph.D.)
Daniel J. Kitei
- Self - Resident Physician in Neurology
- (as Daniel J. Kitei D.O.)
Lynne Kitei
- Self - Health Educator, Author
- (as Lynne D. Kitei M.D.)
Edgar D. Mitchell
- Self - Apollo 14 Astronaut, Founder of the Institute of Noetic Science
- (as Edgar Mitchell Ph.D.)
Opiniones destacadas
Watch this for entertainment value only. This is by no measure a documentary featuring any significant critical thought on this subject. It's basically a continuous stream of "Gee I saw sumthin'in the sky!" testimonials which, as an earlier reviewer noted, becomes very tedious after 30-40 minutes.
I have no doubt that thousands of people "saw sumpthin'" unusual in the night skies over Phoenix in March of 1997. But this "documentary" trades purely in the most outlandish and exotic explanations (i.e. visitors from another planet) for that spectacle.
So if you're the type of person who enjoys such meta-science documentaries you'll probably enjoy this film. But if yours is a more critical mind don't waste 90 minutes on it. You wont be either (a) better informed, or (b) convinced by the thesis.
I have no doubt that thousands of people "saw sumpthin'" unusual in the night skies over Phoenix in March of 1997. But this "documentary" trades purely in the most outlandish and exotic explanations (i.e. visitors from another planet) for that spectacle.
So if you're the type of person who enjoys such meta-science documentaries you'll probably enjoy this film. But if yours is a more critical mind don't waste 90 minutes on it. You wont be either (a) better informed, or (b) convinced by the thesis.
"The Phoenix Lights," for all its importance and for all the obvious conviction behind it, gets itself all twisted into a pretzel because neither the visuals nor the witnesses seem able to distinguish between two entirely independent events.
Near sundown, a giant V-shaped formation of lights, perhaps a mile across, passed southward over Henderson, Nevada, interrupting a Little League baseball game. Hundred of witnesses stared up at the thing. It moved slowly and silently out of sight at low altitude. After dark, it passed down I-10 and flew over Phoenix, continuing southward towards Mexico. There is no question about its existence or its properties. It was witnessed by thousands of people, including law enforcement officers, professionals of various types, air traffic controllers, and military and civilian pilots.
Later that night, some Air Force Warthogs apparently dropped a series of bright flares during an exercise. The flares were in a series and disappeared one by one behind the mountains into the target area. The flares were photographed by numerous people, many of the good folk of Phoenix having been alerted to and excited by strange happenings in the sky, by this time.
Nobody knows what the first thing was. So the response of the public becomes, by default, the more interesting story. Somehow, the original story bled into the second. The huge triangle is dismissed as "Air Force flares." A Phoenix councilwoman, entering her office, was asked the morning after the event if she knew anything about the triangle. She'd heard nothing about it but she brought the subject up at the meeting, where it was dismissed with a single joking reply. Her question made it into the media, however, and her office phone lit up. When her answering machine could no longer handle the volume, the phones of other offices were called into play. She estimates the number of phone calls from eyewitnesses to the original incident at a thousand. She managed to respond in person to several hundred of them. In its description of the reports, the media singled out one, from a young boy who thought they were airplanes. Thereafter, the sightings were described as man-made objects mistaken for something else. The governor's response was to make a public announcement dismissing the affair, while accompanied by a staff member dressed in an extra-terrestrial costume.
The film was organized by a married couple, both doctors, living on the outskirts of Phoenix. Both had seen the giant triangle with its quiet amber lights. But although the movie was written by one of the docs, it couldn't be more confusing. She evidently saw lights on several different occasions and there were times -- long moments -- in which I didn't know which sighting she was talking about or which picture of which sighting I was looking at.
Too much time is wasted on "ancient visitations" and that sort of irrelevant stuff. And all the witnesses, including the two docs, seem convinced that they observed something from outer space. In the film, the witnesses describe the triangular orange lights as having a calming effect, almost deliberate. One likens it to a parade designed to show humans that "they" have no destructive intentions.
I'm a kind of scientist too, and I'm not so sure about all that. It's too much akin to Kierkegaard's "leap of (or to) faith", the "faith", in this case, lying in what Alan Hyneck called the extra-terrestrial hypothesis. It seems undeniable that something was there -- but what? Sure, it could be a space ship with aliens inside, or a kind of drone, but other explanations are possible. We now believe that matter can take four forms -- solid, gas, liquid, plasma -- but suppose there are others that occur more rarely and take forms like triangles or spheres. Suppose the objects aren't objects at all, but neural impulses in the mind of some cosmic intelligence? Can we be sure they aren't? Every explanation seems as absurd as any other.
The film is screwed up and that's too bad because we need to know more about the thing and its movements than we do about feelings of awe and visits in Biblical times. I'm personally convinced that something is going on because when I was in high school, at three in the morning of a bitterly cold night on an empty rural road, a friend and I witnessed the antics of a moon-like sphere in the crystalline atmosphere. It was fuzzy and bright, flew against the wind, wobbled slowly from side to side, made not a sound, and did a right-angle turn. I don't know what it was, although I waved and shouted at it. Nobody knows what it was. But if you're going to speculate, I would hope you would organize a film better than this.
Near sundown, a giant V-shaped formation of lights, perhaps a mile across, passed southward over Henderson, Nevada, interrupting a Little League baseball game. Hundred of witnesses stared up at the thing. It moved slowly and silently out of sight at low altitude. After dark, it passed down I-10 and flew over Phoenix, continuing southward towards Mexico. There is no question about its existence or its properties. It was witnessed by thousands of people, including law enforcement officers, professionals of various types, air traffic controllers, and military and civilian pilots.
Later that night, some Air Force Warthogs apparently dropped a series of bright flares during an exercise. The flares were in a series and disappeared one by one behind the mountains into the target area. The flares were photographed by numerous people, many of the good folk of Phoenix having been alerted to and excited by strange happenings in the sky, by this time.
Nobody knows what the first thing was. So the response of the public becomes, by default, the more interesting story. Somehow, the original story bled into the second. The huge triangle is dismissed as "Air Force flares." A Phoenix councilwoman, entering her office, was asked the morning after the event if she knew anything about the triangle. She'd heard nothing about it but she brought the subject up at the meeting, where it was dismissed with a single joking reply. Her question made it into the media, however, and her office phone lit up. When her answering machine could no longer handle the volume, the phones of other offices were called into play. She estimates the number of phone calls from eyewitnesses to the original incident at a thousand. She managed to respond in person to several hundred of them. In its description of the reports, the media singled out one, from a young boy who thought they were airplanes. Thereafter, the sightings were described as man-made objects mistaken for something else. The governor's response was to make a public announcement dismissing the affair, while accompanied by a staff member dressed in an extra-terrestrial costume.
The film was organized by a married couple, both doctors, living on the outskirts of Phoenix. Both had seen the giant triangle with its quiet amber lights. But although the movie was written by one of the docs, it couldn't be more confusing. She evidently saw lights on several different occasions and there were times -- long moments -- in which I didn't know which sighting she was talking about or which picture of which sighting I was looking at.
Too much time is wasted on "ancient visitations" and that sort of irrelevant stuff. And all the witnesses, including the two docs, seem convinced that they observed something from outer space. In the film, the witnesses describe the triangular orange lights as having a calming effect, almost deliberate. One likens it to a parade designed to show humans that "they" have no destructive intentions.
I'm a kind of scientist too, and I'm not so sure about all that. It's too much akin to Kierkegaard's "leap of (or to) faith", the "faith", in this case, lying in what Alan Hyneck called the extra-terrestrial hypothesis. It seems undeniable that something was there -- but what? Sure, it could be a space ship with aliens inside, or a kind of drone, but other explanations are possible. We now believe that matter can take four forms -- solid, gas, liquid, plasma -- but suppose there are others that occur more rarely and take forms like triangles or spheres. Suppose the objects aren't objects at all, but neural impulses in the mind of some cosmic intelligence? Can we be sure they aren't? Every explanation seems as absurd as any other.
The film is screwed up and that's too bad because we need to know more about the thing and its movements than we do about feelings of awe and visits in Biblical times. I'm personally convinced that something is going on because when I was in high school, at three in the morning of a bitterly cold night on an empty rural road, a friend and I witnessed the antics of a moon-like sphere in the crystalline atmosphere. It was fuzzy and bright, flew against the wind, wobbled slowly from side to side, made not a sound, and did a right-angle turn. I don't know what it was, although I waved and shouted at it. Nobody knows what it was. But if you're going to speculate, I would hope you would organize a film better than this.
I welcomed the omission of buffoon debunkers & was impressed with the honest details by the experiencers themselves. While focusing on the inexplicable AZ mass sighting of 1997, this film also includes the history & scientific analysis of the data, which has been missing in most films of this genre. Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, a military/Vietnam/Commercial pilot, PhD optical experts & others of note confirm these century old global events, yet with photo & first-hand witness testimony verifying mile wide advanced technological vehicles appearing silently right over their heads, others would either ignore, continue to dismiss & even bash the credible documentation that something cryptic is going on for which there is no explanation - 26 yrs. Later - as well as berate this courageous attempt to educate the public. Definitely worth checking out.
This is one of the best documentaries ever produced on the subject. And they finally take it to the next level, meaning that they are compelling us to consider the real implications of contact with intelligent life from another world, and encouraging us to consider our place in the cosmos, and the fact that we are part of a larger community. Everyone should watch this and regain a sense of awe and wonder at the incredible potential awaiting us. We must grow up as a race and turn our gaze outward AND inward.
It is both puzzling and disconcerting that some ridicule this valiant grass-roots attempt to inform the public of one, if not the most documented and important UFO sighting incidents in modern history. This film not only incorporates compelling and consistent witness reports, photo evidence (authenticated by Scientific analysis), while highlighting the 1997 AZ mass event, but it goes a step further to give the viewer a glimpse into what the UFO topic is all about. The film covers the History, strong Media bias, impact to the witness, as well as the significant message experiencers receive during anomalous events. People from all walks of life, including Astronauts, military, law enforcement, Hospice workers, artists, health professionals, etc. verify the validity of these cryptic visitations. The bottom line is that this film is the ONLY Feature confirming that something extra-ordinary appeared in the skies of AZ and it wasn't just on March 13, 1997. The sightings of strange objects were reported for centuries before, during and after the statewide "parade", as the film adeptly imparts. Note that this cinema project is appropriate for family viewing.
Argumento
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThere was only one officially logged aviation report filed during the event. Actor Kurt Russell was the civilian pilot who, upon approach to Sky Harbor airport, witnessed the six lights in a v-shaped formation and, concerned, contacted the airport control tower. He filed the incident with tower officials. According to Russell, his own logbook contains the report. Many years later he would recall the event while watching a documentary about the event...
- ConexionesReferences Invasores de Marte (1953)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Phoenix Lights?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- The Phoenix Lights
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 20 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Phoenix Lights Documentary (2005)?
Responda