Spitfire Over Berlin

The entire movie consists of headshots of pilots in phony aircraft. I've seen better CGI on Saturday morning cartoons -- from the '60s! And calling the acting wooden is an insult to actual wood... Everything about this stinker is phony.

You have been warned.

It's more like a high school project than a movie. No reason to go on but I need 150 words. The audio isn't mixed right so it doesn't match. Special effects would have been better off using a model airplane on a string. Music rarely matches what's going on. Plot has many problems "you're the only pilot left for this mission!" My first ever review and I'm just trying to save another innocent person from this fake rating.

Apparently it was made on a tiny budget, oh it shows. It is definitely not a Hollywood blockbuster, don't expect too much of it.

Yes, there probably are many stories to tell to honor the pilots flying in WW2, but this, well, it is just plain boring, there is no content. The CGI clearly visible after the first couple of seconds turned me off immediately. Would better CGI and a wellknown actor have made it better? No, because there wasn't any content or story.

Disjointed, uninteresting and and languid. CGI straight out of the 80's, it's diabolical. Amateur script, average actors and 80% of the film takes place in the cockpit, I assume to limit any additional expenditure on action scenes. Save your breath and effort, there are better WWII shorts on You Tube produced by University students.

Being a indie film producer myself, I admire that this team at least got distribution on this. In today's very critical audience (you can see by the rude comments here) either you have at the very least, a 2 million dollar budget, or don't film. This film might have fared better just doing film festivals and maybe getting a streaming service to pickup. The storyline is good, but yes, today's sophisicated audience is brutal if you are not using Hollywood "Industrial Light & Magic" level CGI as they can tell. It is sad and if this was released back in the 60's or early 70's, it might have gotten a pass. I admire the filmmaker for working with what budget he had, and who knows, he might make his investment back and thats all that is important. Critics may gripe, but at least they paid to watch it somehow and that is all the investors care about.