En 1979, un grupo de jóvenes cineastas se dispuso a hacer una película para adultos en la zona rural de Texas, pero cuando sus anfitriones solitarios y ancianos los atrapan en el acto, el el... Leer todoEn 1979, un grupo de jóvenes cineastas se dispuso a hacer una película para adultos en la zona rural de Texas, pero cuando sus anfitriones solitarios y ancianos los atrapan en el acto, el elenco se encuentra luchando por sus vidas.En 1979, un grupo de jóvenes cineastas se dispuso a hacer una película para adultos en la zona rural de Texas, pero cuando sus anfitriones solitarios y ancianos los atrapan en el acto, el elenco se encuentra luchando por sus vidas.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 4 premios ganados y 43 nominaciones en total
Geoff Dolan
- Deputy
- (as Geoffrey Dolan)
Matthew J. Saville
- Officer Mitchell
- (as Matthew Saville)
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'X' is a horror film that blends 1970s slasher aesthetics with modern elements, praised for its atmosphere and visual style. Mia Goth's dual performance is lauded for complexity, while themes of aging and sexuality resonate deeply. The film's practical effects and gore receive mixed opinions. Some appreciate its thematic richness and artistic qualities, while others criticize its slow pace, predictability, and lack of originality. The transition between the film's halves sparks debate, with varied reactions to its pacing and structure. Overall, 'X' is a mixed bag, appealing to horror enthusiasts yet disappointing some with its flaws.
Opiniones destacadas
I can't with movies full of characters that just walk around without any instinct doing the absolute dumbest things they could possibly choose before they're murdered. It's literally the whole movie. The 'action and gore' is actually pretty tame. The sex is explicit. The characters are idiots.
An interesting slow burn, but without enough to make it stand against the countless other slasher films, X is a fine film and another tribute to the iconic genre that made horror so popular in the first place. Granted, I do enjoy myself a slasher film from time to time- I'm quite fond of films like Nightmare on Elm Street and My Bloody Valentine, but where X faults among the others is through using a rather familiar formula without any true unique purpose. Throughout the film the characters often talk about an X factor, something that makes Mia Goth's character special and starworthy- but unlike its mentionings- this film just doesn't have that. The acting is really good, I love the underrated Mia Goth as always- as well as Brittany Snow, Martin Henderson, and even Kid Cudi did a rather impressive job. The cinematography is fantastic and perfectly fits the amitpshere and tone the film is going for. The music is enjoyable and tense, and its pacing can be a bit slow at times, but does allow for an interesting point of view. Its main problem lies solely in its script, which revolves largely around a smut film production- but takes too many elements and formulaic tendencies from other horror films like Evil Dead, Friday the 13th, The Visit and most obviously Texas Chainsaw Massacre to really stand out on its own and become its own thing. In the end, its not a bad watch, I wouldn't watch it again, but I certainly didn't mind watching it. It isn't the most memorable, but I certainly don't have any disdain for it. It just could have been more, especially given the talent involved, but ironically it settled for less.
My Rating: 5.8/10.
My Rating: 5.8/10.
Pros.
It has some decent gore Mostly good acting Lots of 70s horror Easter eggs/references Martin Henderson doing what has to be the best Matthew McConaughey impression I've heard in a long time (seriously I really expected him to say "alright alright alright) The early Eaten Alive nod and final payoff are both hugely effective Really solid soundtrack
Cons.
It's very slow to get started. And not in the gradual suspenseful build up of tension sense, but that very little happens for close to an hour.
Despite wanting to be a really smart horror, the film still falls into the standard tropes of characters being morons who make dumb decisions and doesn't really bring anything original to the table besides better quality (but not perfect) cinematography When the carnage begins, the lighting gets very dark and sometimes obscures the shots and detail which may be a creative choice but does somewhat reduce the enjoyment
Overall, very decent but not a game changer Worth watching.
It has some decent gore Mostly good acting Lots of 70s horror Easter eggs/references Martin Henderson doing what has to be the best Matthew McConaughey impression I've heard in a long time (seriously I really expected him to say "alright alright alright) The early Eaten Alive nod and final payoff are both hugely effective Really solid soundtrack
Cons.
It's very slow to get started. And not in the gradual suspenseful build up of tension sense, but that very little happens for close to an hour.
Despite wanting to be a really smart horror, the film still falls into the standard tropes of characters being morons who make dumb decisions and doesn't really bring anything original to the table besides better quality (but not perfect) cinematography When the carnage begins, the lighting gets very dark and sometimes obscures the shots and detail which may be a creative choice but does somewhat reduce the enjoyment
Overall, very decent but not a game changer Worth watching.
A decent slasher, but does not deserve a 96% rating on RT. The kills felt conveniently cheap and honestly everything was underwhelming. I was hoping to to feel paranoid or scared, but didn't feel much of anything. Spent most of the movie hoping it would get better or surprise me a little but we've seen this all before.
Not really a jump scare sort of deal and like if you read the little description about the movie it has all the spoilers in it already.
First point, I thought it was really funny when kid Cudi was standing in the door frame and you could only see his shadow
Secondly For a movie about making a porno, there were adequate number boobs shown.
And the prosthetics used to make the main actor look older we're great. In all worth a watch like most things above 5 stars
Little note to IMDB -Not only do I not want to write a 500 word essay I also would not like reading other peoples 500 word essays. Make it like 200 easy.
First point, I thought it was really funny when kid Cudi was standing in the door frame and you could only see his shadow
Secondly For a movie about making a porno, there were adequate number boobs shown.
And the prosthetics used to make the main actor look older we're great. In all worth a watch like most things above 5 stars
Little note to IMDB -Not only do I not want to write a 500 word essay I also would not like reading other peoples 500 word essays. Make it like 200 easy.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe day after X (2022)'s South by Southwest premiere, writer/director Ti West revealed that during a mandatory two-week COVID-19 quarantine in his New Zealand hotel, before production could begin on this film, he wrote a prequel, Pearl (2022). A24 saw the script and greenlit the movie even before production on "X" had wrapped. He asked star Mia Goth if she wished to remain in New Zealand and film "Pearl," and she readily accepted. The prequel released later in 2022.
- ErroresThe film set in 1979 makes reference to missing persons ads on milk cartons. However, the first usage of milk cartons for missing persons was not until 1984.
- Créditos curiososThere are no opening credits. The title doesn't even appear on screen until the end.
- ConexionesEdited into MaXXXine (2024)
- Bandas sonorasAct Naturally
Performed by Loretta Lynn
Written by Vonie Morrison, Johnny Russell
Courtesy of Geffen Records under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is X?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idioma
- También se conoce como
- Dự Án Đẫm Máu
- Locaciones de filmación
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 1,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 11,769,469
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 4,275,126
- 20 mar 2022
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 14,745,049
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 45min(105 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.90 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta