Follies
- El episodio se transmitió el 29 abr 2022
- TV-MA
- 53min
Taverner y los Caballos Lentos intentan por distintos medios localizar a los secuestradores y a Hassan. Ho hace un sorprendente descubrimiento sobre Sid.Taverner y los Caballos Lentos intentan por distintos medios localizar a los secuestradores y a Hassan. Ho hace un sorprendente descubrimiento sobre Sid.Taverner y los Caballos Lentos intentan por distintos medios localizar a los secuestradores y a Hassan. Ho hace un sorprendente descubrimiento sobre Sid.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
The cards being kept close to the chest mainly involve the history between Lamb, Standish (Saskia Reeves) and the body in the bathtub. Like a carrot on a string, it's been baited so many times throughout the series that it feels a little sneaky to keep it all back for the next one, but it doesn't detract too much from what has been a really enjoyable, darkly comedic drama. The final episode continues with the show's wonderful habit of undercutting excitement - Lamb falls asleep as he and River stake out Taverner, Min and Louisa run out of petrol as they chase down the bad guys - and it feels like it ends where it had always planned to. It never felt like the show was losing its way or getting too muddled, even if there were some episodes that felt like they could have merged into one. It's measured and calm, and even as it pulled back on the amount of jokes per episode as the drama kicked in, the wry, dry humour permeates the entire series and feels really in tune with the show's vibe. It's a real shame that Olivia Cooke wasn't utilised more; Sid's spunkiness and the could-they/will-they potential with Lowden could have offered the show a bit more genuine camaraderie (on top of Min's hapless and terrible, but quite sweet, flirting with Louisa). Perhaps she'll return for the second season - the hints are a touch heavy-handed that this might be the case - but her absence in the latter episodes felt palpable after such an auspicious beginning.
Good quality drama is hard to do and there are some good moments here that were previously missing.
The story wraps up well and things are left open for the second season (at the time of writing, series 3 and 4 are also planned).
I had considered ending it here but it is wet Sunday afternoon so will binge on season 2 and hope the quality ending here is retained in the second season.
The episode suffers from a peculiar bloating that transforms necessary resolution into tedious obligation. Revelations arrive with all the surprise of scheduled announcements, whilst supposedly climactic moments feel more perfunctory than genuinely thrilling. One suspects the writers confused thoroughness with dramatic satisfaction.
Gary Oldman remains watchable, though even his considerable charisma cannot entirely disguise the episode's structural shortcomings. Supporting characters revert to their earlier plot-device tendencies, delivering exposition with workmanlike efficiency rather than genuine conviction.
The production values maintain their customary polish, yet cannot compensate for pacing that feels distinctly misjudged. Scenes that should crackle with tension instead lumber toward foregone conclusions with pedestrian inevitability.
Whilst competent enough to avoid complete disappointment, this finale represents a missed opportunity to capitalise on the previous episode's considerable momentum.
A serviceable conclusion that fails to match its predecessor's excellence. I am not rushing to catch Season 2.
What we have, is not exactly a John Le Carre thriller like "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy" BUT instead we have similarly a British based spy thriller about a group of demoted & ostracised spies who find themselves caught up in a corruption web involving domestic terrorists.
The series is based off a series of books which admittedly I've no idea about, but not that impacted my viewing from what I can tell. With the weight of Kristin Scott Thomas behind the show, she helps to elevate it, however surprisingly the equally brilliant Gary Oldman has been given a role that frankly I felt underplayed his talents as an actor, with only the ending finally signalling better to come for his character. Most of the rest of the cast with all due respect are more than adequate, filling in the role as unconvincing spies trying to work their way through all the realpolitik of the civil services in the UK.
It's a decent show, but admittedly it didn't fully grab me by throat (maybe the very ending did a bit). I guess as this series was a special offer, the question is whether I'd then want to take out an Apple+ subscription (even temporarily) on the back of this. The answer is resoundingly no! I expect the series will get better as the underlying stories of the characters reveal themselves, but this first season seemed a little too slapstick at times for my liking amongst all the serious aspects. At heart, it's not really that different in quality to the drama series from the terrestrial channels in the UK, so why pay a subscription for this?
Each to their own. A decent viewing.
This time, we're treated to the classic "evil white guy vs. Innocent non-white hostage" setup. Naturally, our villain decides to stretch his screen time by engaging in a leisurely chat with his victim, because apparently, homicidal urgency isn't in his job description. This painfully overused trope - criminal wastes precious minutes monologuing while the cavalry conveniently closes in - is so worn out it should be retired alongside flip phones. Even for stupid criminals, it's laughably stupid.
By the time the titular slow horses finally meandered onto the scene, I'd already checked out. The ending was telegraphed a mile away, and the tension? Nonexistent. At this point, the series might as well rename itself Predictable Ponies - because slow or not, we always know where it's headed.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaToward the end of the episode, David Cartwright (Jonathan Pryce) said to his grandson, River Cartwright (Jack Lowden), that "Smiley was always coming back from redundancy." Gary Oldman played MI6 agent George Smiley in El espía que sabía demasiado (2011) based on the novel by John le Carré. In the film, Smiley comes back from retirement to smoke out a Soviet agent.
- ErroresDavid Cartwright says that "Smiley was always coming back from redundancy". Smiley was never made redundant.
- Citas
David Cartwright: So you thought, what? Diana Taverner would confess her sins in order to benefit your career while simultaneously destroying her own? Tad naive, wouldn't you say?
River Cartwright: Moscow rules, watch your back. London rules, cover your arse. Yeah
[laughs]
River Cartwright: I seem to have covered her arse, while she stabbed me straight in the back.
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 53min
- Color