Crocodile Vengeance

I've never seen a bad movie, until I saw this one.

This is the worst movie I've seen in 2022!

Bad script, bad actors, the creatures look so fake. I'm pretty sure the budget they've used for this "movie" was more than the box office.

Guys, don't waste your time like I did watching this thing.

They fall from nothing to get eaten from the crocs, st the beginning Lisa was calling Dylan prior the wedding and when they talked about to call the emergency services, they said they don't have a landline? Jeezes I can't forget this specific scene.

This "movie" looks so fake that even a 10 year old would've stop watching this.

For years, the Hampshire Freshwater Crocodile (Crocodylus hampshirius) was widely hunted for its valuable skin, which was used in the UK fashion industry for high-end accessories such as designer handbags, belts and watch straps. A ban on the trapping and killing of the endangered animal was introduced in 1990 to try and prevent total extinction, but the last reported sighting of the reptile in the wild was in 1992 and, with captive breeding programs proving unsuccessful, it is now believed to have gone the way of the dodo.

All of the above is a load of crock.

There are no crocodiles in Hampshire. Haven't been any since prehistoric times. But that hasn't stopped writer/director Paul W. Franklin from setting his killer croc movie in my home county, where the most dangerous wild animal is a badger (seriously, those things are mean-tempered). Putting facts to one side for the moment, a giant man-eating crocodile on the loose in the South-East of England could have been a lot of trashy fun. But on this occasion, it isn't.

Franklin places his wholly unconvincing CGI crocodile amongst a group of people attending a wedding at the only venue in the whole of England without wi-fi or a landline; this leaves a handful of survivors trapped in the main building with no means of escape. No explanation is ever given for the existence of a large man-eating crocodile in Hampshire (seriously, not even the old 'pet flushed down the toilet' or 'escaped zoo animal' excuse) or for why it has never been sighted. None of the unlikeable characters display any level of intelligence or ability to stay on their feet when chased by the reptile, and the plot is a tired collection of well-worn cliches, predictable to the very end.

Franklin resorts to giving viewers not one but two gratuitous sex scenes, which hit the right trashy notes, but they come early in the film, and everything that follows is tough to endure thanks to the diabolical script, laughable acting (was the guy who played the reverend actually an actor or a relation of Franklin?), and extremely weak special effects.

I would give it -10 if I could, that's how bad this movie was. And that's the only reason I am reviewing it. Otherwise I wouldn't even bother.

Nothing positive about this film. And I haven't seen such awful cgi since 1970's. The story? The acting? The way characters were behaving in this movie???!!! Come on.... And the crock, vicious crock, oh boy... that was really bad, I believe I could create a better crock.

No, I don't recommend this movie. Stay away from this stinker. Watch something else.

I need 600 characters to post my review, I don't know why, some people leave 2 lines and it's ok.

A wedding is planned, and everyone is gathered. The bride intended to have it streamed for those who cannot attend, and also have it videotaped. At the place, they throw in a bit of unnecessary nudity. The groom sneaks off with one of the bridesmaids to an evening dalliance, which doesn't work out well for her. But there are serious questions that viewers are able to get answered. If no one has cell phone reception, can another in the group receive a call? Can the wedding be live streamed using just a SLR camera? Can anyone run away from danger without falling or tripping? What does it mean when they say to lock the doors and windows? How bad is the movie croc that only has a few moves, and sometimes has blood after the victim on its teeth, and other times no blood after attacking a victim? How bad does a movie croc look when it seems to be simply pasted into the scene, and that not being done very well? After so many are killed, how upset is the bride at her wedding being ruined? There are movies with dumb people. And there are bad movies. This combines the two.

Well, I can't say that I had actually heard anything about this 2022 movie titled "Croc!" (aka "Crocodile Vengeance") from writer and director Paul W. Franklin, nor seen any trailer or as much as heard a single word. But the movie's cover seemed fairly interesting enough to actually make me want to give the movie a gander. However, I have to admit that I wasn't harboring any expectations, because a lot of these monstrous creature - or killer animals - features tends to be dubious movies at best.

Writer and director Paul W. Franklin managed to deliver a very, very generic creature feature with "Croc!", and even for a movie of this genre then "Croc!" was just bland and amazingly generic. Pretty simplistic storyline really, which worked out well enough, but the movie just felt shallow and sort of pointless really, as "Croc!" didn't offer anything that haven't already been seen and done in other crocodile-based movies.

The acting in "Croc!" was pretty wooden and rigid for the most parts, making the performances on the screen seem sluggish and sort of amateurish. And that wasn't exactly helping to promote "Croc!"

And writer and director Paul W. Franklin had a little bit too much focus on lewd sex scenes, which absolutely meant nothing to the storyline or script, nor helped promote the narrative in any manner. It just felt pointless and ridiculous, and it was something that was very unnecessary to include in the movie.

Now, with "Croc!" being a monstrous creature feature, then of course having believable crocodiles in the movie would be a must. Right? Right! Well, guess what? They didn't have believable crocodiles in the movie, not even believable CGI animated crocodiles. Nay. What they did have, however, was rather poorly animated CGI crocodiles that lacked anything to make them realistic or believable. The way they moved seemed so wrong, and it felt like certainly scenes of the crocodile opening its maw and flapping its tongue around was copied and pasted into the movie at various points throughout the 84 minutes that "Croc!" ran for.

Yeah, "Croc!" was not an impressive foray into the monstrous creature feature. It was a slow paced and sluggish movie which came without notice and will disappear into the mists of oblivion without notice.

My rating of "Croc!" lands on a generous two out of ten stars.