Liam es un investigador científico que se ha quedado atascado en el tiempo. A medida que sus saltos en el tiempo se hacen más extremos, es guiado al futuro por un misterioso anciano, donde e... Leer todoLiam es un investigador científico que se ha quedado atascado en el tiempo. A medida que sus saltos en el tiempo se hacen más extremos, es guiado al futuro por un misterioso anciano, donde es testigo del fin del mundo.Liam es un investigador científico que se ha quedado atascado en el tiempo. A medida que sus saltos en el tiempo se hacen más extremos, es guiado al futuro por un misterioso anciano, donde es testigo del fin del mundo.
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Elenco
- Premios
- 1 premio ganado y 5 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionista
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Warning - I only got 15 minutes through this till I decided it was no longer worth my time so bear that in mind.
A cool concept maybe but it literally has so many jumps between different scenes it's confusing, but not interesting.
You're given nothing on the characters to make you interested either, the actors have no real chance to show any personality. It starts off in a treatment facility of some kind, and rather than building the interest takes you out of that space, the moment the movie starts to build interest it jumps away from the interest and starts again
The only good thing is the look of the film.
A cool concept maybe but it literally has so many jumps between different scenes it's confusing, but not interesting.
You're given nothing on the characters to make you interested either, the actors have no real chance to show any personality. It starts off in a treatment facility of some kind, and rather than building the interest takes you out of that space, the moment the movie starts to build interest it jumps away from the interest and starts again
The only good thing is the look of the film.
I enjoy sci fi. It's my favourite genre. I even enjoy bad sci fi. But this movie takes bad to a whole new level.
I could only manage watching half this movie. There may very well have been a logical ending tying in all the confusing bits, but the monotonous pace of the first half made it seem unlikely.
Nobody is acting, they're simply reading their scripts. The ever present clipboard must have been helpful for the doctor in learning her lines. There's no character development. There's certainly no action.
Do yourself a favour and go watch 2012 again. At least that movie is good for a laugh.
I could only manage watching half this movie. There may very well have been a logical ending tying in all the confusing bits, but the monotonous pace of the first half made it seem unlikely.
Nobody is acting, they're simply reading their scripts. The ever present clipboard must have been helpful for the doctor in learning her lines. There's no character development. There's certainly no action.
Do yourself a favour and go watch 2012 again. At least that movie is good for a laugh.
10toonarly
This movie is not a blockbuster, nor a super CGI tech feast, nor an action thriller, it is a very simple yet well written study in messing around with time. Similar to the old 1960's TV show "Time Tunnel" with it's almost identical time portal setup, this movie tells of a man who is the victim of an accident in time and his path to fix it before the world ends because of it. It is very low budget, and literally most of the action is in a lab or out near a pile of rocks. Not bad for what you get as far as story and rather good acting. Those who put this down or who were "bored" didn't give it a real chance. It is quite good and if you have a peaceful night to enjoy an engaging film, this does a good job. It does keep you interested if you have the brains to figure out what's going on. Nothing questionable, no nudity, no foul language so its good for everyone that can handle a bit of a mind game. Enjoy!
I have seen few poorer films ( hate the word movies) than this effort. I realise each viewer will have their own criteria as to what makes a film watchable but surely top of the list would be ;
1. Good acting
2. Decent dialogue
3. A buy in from the viewer regarding the protagonist(s). We should care about them, or hate them.
This film has failed on all counts.
The acting is stilted, with banal verbal interactions and I feel nothing for the characters.
There is no comparison between Breaking Infinity and the two other films in my title for this review which I believe is the target audience. I could easily re watch those two but this one.. Yes, I realise this is a low-budget film but then so were Paranormal Activity, El Mariachi and The Blair Witch Project. The best bit of this film is the Welsh valley scenery.
Only one positive.. at least I saved a pound watching it in SD.
This film has failed on all counts.
The acting is stilted, with banal verbal interactions and I feel nothing for the characters.
There is no comparison between Breaking Infinity and the two other films in my title for this review which I believe is the target audience. I could easily re watch those two but this one.. Yes, I realise this is a low-budget film but then so were Paranormal Activity, El Mariachi and The Blair Witch Project. The best bit of this film is the Welsh valley scenery.
Only one positive.. at least I saved a pound watching it in SD.
Just saw the premier at Curzon Soho, Shaftesbury Avenue and really enjoyed it. Inventive and original, great performances in particular by both Neil Bishop and Zoe Cunningham. The premise of the film is interesting and I would recommend this to anyone who likes intelligent and thought provoking science fiction. The film is delivered on a limited budget but all the lead actors make the most of their roles and ensure the film delivers. They are convincing in their characters and they hold the film together by the strength of their performances.
Congratulations to cast and crew for a great production.
Congratulations to cast and crew for a great production.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaThe inkblot test given to Liam features several of the real Rorschach test cards, some of which are in color, which are almost never used in media depictions of such tests. Several entities, such as The American Psychiatric Association, and Hogrefe & Huber Publishing, have fought to keep the real tests secret, claiming they would pollute future test results if patients saw the tests ahead of time. But as the copyright period on the inkblots have elapsed, they are in the public domain.
- ErroresWhen he's in the machine, he cannot sit in a chair because he might get fused to it like the mouse in its exercise wheel. But there's no concern that he might be fused to his clothing.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Breaking Infinity?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta